Message ID | 20220616191945.23935-2-logang@deltatee.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Improve Raid5 Lock Contention | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index 5d84bad8b854..b3d1f894f154 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -5841,7 +5841,7 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi) if ((bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) && (conf->reshape_progress != MaxSector) && (mddev->reshape_backwards - ? (logical_sector > conf->reshape_progress && logical_sector <= conf->reshape_safe) + ? (logical_sector >= conf->reshape_progress && logical_sector < conf->reshape_safe) : (logical_sector >= conf->reshape_safe && logical_sector < conf->reshape_progress))) { bio_wouldblock_error(bi); if (rw == WRITE)
The check in raid5_make_request differs very slightly from the logic that causes it to block lower down. This likely does not cause a bug as the check is fuzzy anyway (as reshape may move on between the first check and the subsequent check). However, make it consistent so it can be cleaned up in a subsequent patch. The condition which causes the schedule is: !(mddev->reshape_backwards ? logical_sector < conf->reshape_progress : logical_sector >= conf->reshape_progress) && (mddev->reshape_backwards ? logical_sector < conf->reshape_safe : logical_sector >= conf->reshape_safe) The condition that causes the early bailout is made to match this. Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> --- drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)