@@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ struct dlm_ls {
spinlock_t ls_recover_idr_lock;
wait_queue_head_t ls_wait_general;
wait_queue_head_t ls_recover_lock_wait;
- struct mutex ls_clear_proc_locks;
+ spinlock_t ls_clear_proc_locks;
struct list_head ls_root_list; /* root resources */
struct rw_semaphore ls_root_sem; /* protect root_list */
@@ -6208,7 +6208,7 @@ static struct dlm_lkb *del_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls,
{
struct dlm_lkb *lkb = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+ spin_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
if (list_empty(&proc->locks))
goto out;
@@ -6220,7 +6220,7 @@ static struct dlm_lkb *del_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls,
else
lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_DEAD;
out:
- mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+ spin_unlock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
return lkb;
}
@@ -6257,7 +6257,7 @@ void dlm_clear_proc_locks(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_user_proc *proc)
dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
}
- mutex_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+ spin_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
/* in-progress unlocks */
list_for_each_entry_safe(lkb, safe, &proc->unlocking, lkb_ownqueue) {
@@ -6273,7 +6273,7 @@ void dlm_clear_proc_locks(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_user_proc *proc)
dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
}
- mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+ spin_unlock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
dlm_unlock_recovery(ls);
}
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int new_lockspace(const char *name, const char *cluster,
atomic_set(&ls->ls_requestqueue_cnt, 0);
init_waitqueue_head(&ls->ls_requestqueue_wait);
mutex_init(&ls->ls_requestqueue_mutex);
- mutex_init(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+ spin_lock_init(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
/* Due backwards compatibility with 3.1 we need to use maximum
* possible dlm message size to be sure the message will fit and
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ void dlm_user_add_ast(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, uint32_t flags, int mode,
return;
ls = lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls;
- mutex_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+ spin_lock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
/* If ORPHAN/DEAD flag is set, it means the process is dead so an ast
can't be delivered. For ORPHAN's, dlm_clear_proc_locks() freed
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ void dlm_user_add_ast(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, uint32_t flags, int mode,
spin_unlock(&proc->locks_spin);
}
out:
- mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
+ spin_unlock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
}
static int device_user_lock(struct dlm_user_proc *proc,
This patch changes the ls_clear_proc_locks to a spinlock because there is no need to handle it as a mutex as there is no sleepable context when ls_clear_proc_locks is held. This allows us to call those functionality in non-sleepable contexts. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> --- fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h | 2 +- fs/dlm/lock.c | 8 ++++---- fs/dlm/lockspace.c | 2 +- fs/dlm/user.c | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)