Message ID | 29a2488aa641319199c597d1dc1151c700e32430.1680172791.git.johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Delegated to: | Song Liu |
Headers | show |
Series | bio: check return values of bio_add_page | expand |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:44 AM Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> wrote: > > The raid5-ppl submission code uses bio_add_page() to add a page to a > newly created bio. bio_add_page() can fail, but the return value is never > checked. For adding consecutive pages, the return is actually checked and > a new bio is allocated if adding the page fails. > > Use __bio_add_page() as adding a single page to a newly created bio is > guaranteed to succeed. > > This brings us a step closer to marking bio_add_page() as __must_check. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> > Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c b/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c index e495939bb3e0..eaea57aee602 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static void ppl_submit_iounit(struct ppl_io_unit *io) bio->bi_end_io = ppl_log_endio; bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = log->next_io_sector; - bio_add_page(bio, io->header_page, PAGE_SIZE, 0); + __bio_add_page(bio, io->header_page, PAGE_SIZE, 0); pr_debug("%s: log->current_io_sector: %llu\n", __func__, (unsigned long long)log->next_io_sector); @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static void ppl_submit_iounit(struct ppl_io_unit *io) prev->bi_opf, GFP_NOIO, &ppl_conf->bs); bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bio_end_sector(prev); - bio_add_page(bio, sh->ppl_page, PAGE_SIZE, 0); + __bio_add_page(bio, sh->ppl_page, PAGE_SIZE, 0); bio_chain(bio, prev); ppl_submit_iounit_bio(io, prev);