| Message ID | 20180926174525.4570.83126.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-rdma-owner@kernel.org>
Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org
[172.30.200.125])
by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4BD913
for <patchwork-linux-rdma@patchwork.kernel.org>;
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB052B5DA
for <patchwork-linux-rdma@patchwork.kernel.org>;
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486)
id 5FC6D2B5ED; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ECC2B5DA
for <patchwork-linux-rdma@patchwork.kernel.org>;
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:52:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
id S1727280AbeI0AHA (ORCPT
<rfc822;patchwork-linux-rdma@patchwork.kernel.org>);
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:07:00 -0400
Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:32817 "EHLO mga17.intel.com"
rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
id S1726230AbeI0AHA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>);
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:07:00 -0400
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
26 Sep 2018 10:52:55 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,307,1534834800";
d="scan'208";a="93945737"
Received: from scymds02.sc.intel.com ([10.82.195.37])
by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2018 10:47:43 -0700
Received: from scvm10.sc.intel.com (scvm10.sc.intel.com [10.82.195.27])
by scymds02.sc.intel.com
with ESMTP id w8QHlgPS010566;
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:47:42 -0700
Received: from scvm10.sc.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by scvm10.sc.intel.com with ESMTP id w8QHlgWd010362;
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:47:42 -0700
Subject: [PATCH for-next 0/2] IB/hfi1: Some additional bug fixes
From: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
To: jgg@ziepe.ca, dledford@redhat.com
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>,
Alex Estrin <alex.estrin@intel.com>,
Kaike Wan <kaike.wan@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:47:42 -0700
Message-ID: <20180926174525.4570.83126.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com>
User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-18-g2e886-dirty
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
|
| Series |
IB/hfi1: Some additional bug fixes
|
expand
|
Hi Doug and Jason, Here we have a couple more bug fixes. These are less serious than others submitted and not good candidates for the rc so sending these for -next. The first patch is one that I originally sent for-rc but didn't make the bar since it's just a theoretical fix. Have removed the stable keyword and am resubmitting it for the next merge window with the test of these. --- Alex Estrin (1): IB/hfi1: Add mtu check for operational data VLs Kaike Wan (1): IB/hfi1: Use VL15 for SM packets drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/qp.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- -Denny