mbox series

[v2,for-next,0/3] IB/hfi1: Some additional bug fixes

Message ID 20180926174907.13119.35978.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series IB/hfi1: Some additional bug fixes | expand

Message

Dennis Dalessandro Sept. 26, 2018, 5:55 p.m. UTC
Hi Doug and Jason,

Here we have a couple more bug fixes. These are less serious than others
submitted and not good candidates for the rc so sending these for -next. The
first patch is one that I originally sent for-rc but didn't make the bar
since it's just a theoretical fix. Have removed the stable keyword and am
resubmitting it for the next merge window with the test of these.

Changes since v1:
Add patch that I forgot to attach the first time

---

Alex Estrin (1):
      IB/hfi1: Add mtu check for operational data VLs

Dennis Dalessandro (1):
      IB/hfi1: Ensure ucast_dlid access doesnt exceed bounds

Kaike Wan (1):
      IB/hfi1: Use VL15 for SM packets


 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.c                |   26 +++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/qp.c                  |   14 ++++++++++--
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/opa_vnic/opa_vnic_encap.c |    3 ++-
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--
-Denny

Comments

Jason Gunthorpe Sept. 28, 2018, 4:24 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:55:40AM -0700, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> Hi Doug and Jason,
> 
> Here we have a couple more bug fixes. These are less serious than others
> submitted and not good candidates for the rc so sending these for -next. The
> first patch is one that I originally sent for-rc but didn't make the bar
> since it's just a theoretical fix. Have removed the stable keyword and am
> resubmitting it for the next merge window with the test of these.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> Add patch that I forgot to attach the first time
> 
> ---
> 
> Alex Estrin (1):
>       IB/hfi1: Add mtu check for operational data VLs
> 
> Dennis Dalessandro (1):
>       IB/hfi1: Ensure ucast_dlid access doesnt exceed bounds
> 
> Kaike Wan (1):
>       IB/hfi1: Use VL15 for SM packets

Applied to for-next, thanks

Jason