Message ID | 20191126141055.58836.79452.stgit@awfm-01.aw.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | rdmavt/hfi1 updates for next | expand |
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:12:07AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > Here are some refactoring and code reorg patches for the merge window. Nothing > too scary, no new features. This lays the ground work for stuff coming in > future merge cycles. This is far too late for this cycle Jason
On 11/26/2019 9:12 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > Here are some refactoring and code reorg patches for the merge window. Nothing > too scary, no new features. This lays the ground work for stuff coming in > future merge cycles. > > There is also one bug fix, from Kaike. > > Changes from v1 > --------------- > Fix Review-by tags with corrupted email address. > > --- > > Grzegorz Andrejczuk (3): > IB/hfi1: Move common receive IRQ code to function > IB/hfi1: Decouple IRQ name from type > IB/hfi1: Return void in packet receiving functions > > Kaike Wan (1): > IB/hfi1: Don't cancel unused work item > > Michael J. Ruhl (1): > IB/hfi1: List all receive contexts from debugfs > > Mike Marciniszyn (6): > IB/hfi1: Add accessor API routines to access context members > IB/hfi1: Move chip specific functions to chip.c > IB/hfi1: Add fast and slow handlers for receive context > IB/hfi1: IB/hfi1: Add an API to handle special case drop > IB/hfi1: Create API for auto activate > IB/rdmavt: Correct comments in rdmavt_qp.h header I guess these didn't catch the train for 5.5 merge window. Do I need to resubmit to break this into two series, one for RC and one for next? I think 1, 9, 10, and 11 could/should probably go for RC. -Denny
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 08:34:40AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > On 11/26/2019 9:12 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > > Here are some refactoring and code reorg patches for the merge window. Nothing > > too scary, no new features. This lays the ground work for stuff coming in > > future merge cycles. > > > > There is also one bug fix, from Kaike. > > > > Changes from v1 > > Fix Review-by tags with corrupted email address. > > > > > > Grzegorz Andrejczuk (3): > > IB/hfi1: Move common receive IRQ code to function > > IB/hfi1: Decouple IRQ name from type > > IB/hfi1: Return void in packet receiving functions > > > > Kaike Wan (1): > > IB/hfi1: Don't cancel unused work item > > > > Michael J. Ruhl (1): > > IB/hfi1: List all receive contexts from debugfs > > > > Mike Marciniszyn (6): > > IB/hfi1: Add accessor API routines to access context members > > IB/hfi1: Move chip specific functions to chip.c > > IB/hfi1: Add fast and slow handlers for receive context > > IB/hfi1: IB/hfi1: Add an API to handle special case drop > > IB/hfi1: Create API for auto activate > > IB/rdmavt: Correct comments in rdmavt_qp.h header > > I guess these didn't catch the train for 5.5 merge window. Do I need to > resubmit to break this into two series, one for RC and one for next? It is more reliable if it shows in patchworks as you want > I think 1, 9, 10, and 11 could/should probably go for RC. Make sure they have suitable commit messages please Jason
On 12/11/2019 11:21 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 08:34:40AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: >> On 11/26/2019 9:12 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: >>> Here are some refactoring and code reorg patches for the merge window. Nothing >>> too scary, no new features. This lays the ground work for stuff coming in >>> future merge cycles. >>> >>> There is also one bug fix, from Kaike. >>> >>> Changes from v1 >>> Fix Review-by tags with corrupted email address. >>> >>> >>> Grzegorz Andrejczuk (3): >>> IB/hfi1: Move common receive IRQ code to function >>> IB/hfi1: Decouple IRQ name from type >>> IB/hfi1: Return void in packet receiving functions >>> >>> Kaike Wan (1): >>> IB/hfi1: Don't cancel unused work item >>> >>> Michael J. Ruhl (1): >>> IB/hfi1: List all receive contexts from debugfs >>> >>> Mike Marciniszyn (6): >>> IB/hfi1: Add accessor API routines to access context members >>> IB/hfi1: Move chip specific functions to chip.c >>> IB/hfi1: Add fast and slow handlers for receive context >>> IB/hfi1: IB/hfi1: Add an API to handle special case drop >>> IB/hfi1: Create API for auto activate >>> IB/rdmavt: Correct comments in rdmavt_qp.h header >> >> I guess these didn't catch the train for 5.5 merge window. Do I need to >> resubmit to break this into two series, one for RC and one for next? > > It is more reliable if it shows in patchworks as you want Ok, you can toss this series then if you haven't yet and I'll respin and resubmit. > >> I think 1, 9, 10, and 11 could/should probably go for RC. > > Make sure they have suitable commit messages please Will do. -Denny