diff mbox

[1/1] mlx4_en: remove unnecessary returned value check

Message ID 1499841873-10275-1-git-send-email-yanjun.zhu@oracle.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show

Commit Message

Zhu Yanjun July 12, 2017, 6:44 a.m. UTC
The function __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry always returns zero. So
it is not necessary to check it.

Cc: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Yuval Shaia July 12, 2017, 8:36 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:44:33AM -0400, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> The function __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry always returns zero. So
> it is not necessary to check it.
> 
> Cc: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c
> index 249a458..bfb185d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ int mlx4_zone_add_one(struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zone_alloc,
>  }
>  
>  /* Should be called under a lock */
> -static int __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(struct mlx4_zone_entry *entry)
> +static void __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(struct mlx4_zone_entry *entry)
>  {
>  	struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zone_alloc = entry->allocator;
>  
> @@ -315,8 +315,6 @@ static int __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(struct mlx4_zone_entry *entry)
>  		}
>  		zone_alloc->mask = mask;
>  	}
> -
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void mlx4_zone_allocator_destroy(struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zone_alloc)
> @@ -468,7 +466,8 @@ int mlx4_zone_remove_one(struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zones, u32 uid)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	res = __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(zone);
> +	__mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(zone);
> +	res = 0;

Will look better if initialization will move to variable declaration.

Besides this minor thing - lgtm.

Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>

>  
>  out:
>  	spin_unlock(&zones->lock);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Leon Romanovsky July 12, 2017, 9:46 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:36:48AM +0300, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:44:33AM -0400, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> > The function __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry always returns zero. So
> > it is not necessary to check it.
> >
> > Cc: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
> > Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c | 7 +++----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c
> > index 249a458..bfb185d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c
> > @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ int mlx4_zone_add_one(struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zone_alloc,
> >  }
> >
> >  /* Should be called under a lock */
> > -static int __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(struct mlx4_zone_entry *entry)
> > +static void __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(struct mlx4_zone_entry *entry)
> >  {
> >  	struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zone_alloc = entry->allocator;
> >
> > @@ -315,8 +315,6 @@ static int __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(struct mlx4_zone_entry *entry)
> >  		}
> >  		zone_alloc->mask = mask;
> >  	}
> > -
> > -	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  void mlx4_zone_allocator_destroy(struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zone_alloc)
> > @@ -468,7 +466,8 @@ int mlx4_zone_remove_one(struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zones, u32 uid)
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	res = __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(zone);
> > +	__mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(zone);
> > +	res = 0;
>
> Will look better if initialization will move to variable declaration.
>

Yes, please.

Thanks
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c
index 249a458..bfb185d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/alloc.c
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@  int mlx4_zone_add_one(struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zone_alloc,
 }
 
 /* Should be called under a lock */
-static int __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(struct mlx4_zone_entry *entry)
+static void __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(struct mlx4_zone_entry *entry)
 {
 	struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zone_alloc = entry->allocator;
 
@@ -315,8 +315,6 @@  static int __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(struct mlx4_zone_entry *entry)
 		}
 		zone_alloc->mask = mask;
 	}
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 void mlx4_zone_allocator_destroy(struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zone_alloc)
@@ -468,7 +466,8 @@  int mlx4_zone_remove_one(struct mlx4_zone_allocator *zones, u32 uid)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	res = __mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(zone);
+	__mlx4_zone_remove_one_entry(zone);
+	res = 0;
 
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&zones->lock);