Message ID | 1559222731-16715-4-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Introduce new API for T10-PI offload | expand |
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > From: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> > > This is a preparation for signature verbs API re-design. In the new > design a single MR with IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY type will be used to perform > the needed mapping for data integrity operations. > > Signed-off-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com> > Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Looks good, but thinks like this that are very Linux specific really should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Otherwise: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
On 6/4/2019 10:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >> From: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> >> >> This is a preparation for signature verbs API re-design. In the new >> design a single MR with IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY type will be used to perform >> the needed mapping for data integrity operations. >> >> Signed-off-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> >> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com> >> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> >> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> > Looks good, but thinks like this that are very Linux specific really > should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Well we used the convention of other exported functions in this .h file. If the maintainers are not against that, we can fix it. Jason/Leon/Doug ? > > Otherwise: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:02:58PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > On 6/4/2019 10:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > From: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> > > > > > > This is a preparation for signature verbs API re-design. In the new > > > design a single MR with IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY type will be used to perform > > > the needed mapping for data integrity operations. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> > > > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> > > Looks good, but thinks like this that are very Linux specific really > > should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. > > Well we used the convention of other exported functions in this .h file. > > If the maintainers are not against that, we can fix it. > > Jason/Leon/Doug ? Since it is in a .c file that is dual licensed I have a hard time justifying the _GPL prefix. Although I would agree with CH that it does seem to be very Linux specific. Honestly, I've never seen a clear description of when to use one or the other choice. Jason
On 6/4/2019 3:43 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:02:58PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >> On 6/4/2019 10:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >>>> From: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> >>>> >>>> This is a preparation for signature verbs API re-design. In the new >>>> design a single MR with IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY type will be used to perform >>>> the needed mapping for data integrity operations. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> >>>> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> >>> Looks good, but thinks like this that are very Linux specific really >>> should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. >> Well we used the convention of other exported functions in this .h file. >> >> If the maintainers are not against that, we can fix it. >> >> Jason/Leon/Doug ? > Since it is in a .c file that is dual licensed I have a hard time > justifying the _GPL prefix. > > Although I would agree with CH that it does seem to be very Linux > specific. > > Honestly, I've never seen a clear description of when to use one or > the other choice. I'm also not familiar with licensing stuff. I guess you prefer using the common EXPORT_SYMBOL for verbs.c functions, correct ? > > Jason
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:38:36PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > On 6/4/2019 3:43 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:02:58PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > On 6/4/2019 10:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > > > From: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> > > > > > > > > > > This is a preparation for signature verbs API re-design. In the new > > > > > design a single MR with IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY type will be used to perform > > > > > the needed mapping for data integrity operations. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> > > > > Looks good, but thinks like this that are very Linux specific really > > > > should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. > > > Well we used the convention of other exported functions in this .h file. > > > > > > If the maintainers are not against that, we can fix it. > > > > > > Jason/Leon/Doug ? > > Since it is in a .c file that is dual licensed I have a hard time > > justifying the _GPL prefix. > > > > Although I would agree with CH that it does seem to be very Linux > > specific. > > > > Honestly, I've never seen a clear description of when to use one or > > the other choice. > > I'm also not familiar with licensing stuff. > > I guess you prefer using the common EXPORT_SYMBOL for verbs.c functions, > correct ? Yes, it is much easier for us, instead of trying to pick specific license for specific function. Thanks
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c index 78dc07c6ac4b..14a6d351ad1e 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c @@ -2329,6 +2329,7 @@ void ib_set_device_ops(struct ib_device *dev, const struct ib_device_ops *ops) SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, alloc_fmr); SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, alloc_hw_stats); SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, alloc_mr); + SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, alloc_mr_integrity); SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, alloc_mw); SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, alloc_pd); SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, alloc_rdma_netdev); diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c index e080202ff673..80b9dc0dbd6a 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c @@ -2002,6 +2002,9 @@ struct ib_mr *ib_alloc_mr_user(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_mr_type mr_type, if (!pd->device->ops.alloc_mr) return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(mr_type == IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY)) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + mr = pd->device->ops.alloc_mr(pd, mr_type, max_num_sg, udata); if (!IS_ERR(mr)) { mr->device = pd->device; @@ -2019,6 +2022,49 @@ struct ib_mr *ib_alloc_mr_user(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_mr_type mr_type, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_alloc_mr_user); +/** + * ib_alloc_mr_integrity() - Allocates an integrity memory region + * @pd: protection domain associated with the region + * @max_num_data_sg: maximum data sg entries available for registration + * @max_num_meta_sg: maximum metadata sg entries available for + * registration + * + * Notes: + * Memory registration page/sg lists must not exceed max_num_sg, + * also the integrity page/sg lists must not exceed max_num_meta_sg. + * + */ +struct ib_mr *ib_alloc_mr_integrity(struct ib_pd *pd, + u32 max_num_data_sg, + u32 max_num_meta_sg) +{ + struct ib_mr *mr; + + if (!pd->device->ops.alloc_mr_integrity) + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP); + + if (!max_num_meta_sg) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + mr = pd->device->ops.alloc_mr_integrity(pd, max_num_data_sg, + max_num_meta_sg); + if (IS_ERR(mr)) + return mr; + + mr->device = pd->device; + mr->pd = pd; + mr->dm = NULL; + mr->uobject = NULL; + atomic_inc(&pd->usecnt); + mr->need_inval = false; + mr->res.type = RDMA_RESTRACK_MR; + rdma_restrack_kadd(&mr->res); + mr->type = IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY; + + return mr; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_alloc_mr_integrity); + /* "Fast" memory regions */ struct ib_fmr *ib_alloc_fmr(struct ib_pd *pd, diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h index 482237908fb9..1669a3886abf 100644 --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h @@ -799,6 +799,8 @@ __attribute_const__ int ib_rate_to_mbps(enum ib_rate rate); * application * @IB_MR_TYPE_DMA: memory region that is used for DMA operations * without address translations (VA=PA) + * @IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY: memory region that is used for + * data integrity operations */ enum ib_mr_type { IB_MR_TYPE_MEM_REG, @@ -807,6 +809,7 @@ enum ib_mr_type { IB_MR_TYPE_DM, IB_MR_TYPE_USER, IB_MR_TYPE_DMA, + IB_MR_TYPE_INTEGRITY, }; enum ib_mr_status_check { @@ -2370,6 +2373,9 @@ struct ib_device_ops { int (*dereg_mr)(struct ib_mr *mr, struct ib_udata *udata); struct ib_mr *(*alloc_mr)(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_mr_type mr_type, u32 max_num_sg, struct ib_udata *udata); + struct ib_mr *(*alloc_mr_integrity)(struct ib_pd *pd, + u32 max_num_data_sg, + u32 max_num_meta_sg); int (*advise_mr)(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_uverbs_advise_mr_advice advice, u32 flags, struct ib_sge *sg_list, u32 num_sge, @@ -4047,6 +4053,10 @@ static inline struct ib_mr *ib_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, return ib_alloc_mr_user(pd, mr_type, max_num_sg, NULL); } +struct ib_mr *ib_alloc_mr_integrity(struct ib_pd *pd, + u32 max_num_data_sg, + u32 max_num_meta_sg); + /** * ib_update_fast_reg_key - updates the key portion of the fast_reg MR * R_Key and L_Key.