diff mbox series

[rdma-next,1/3] RDMA/mana_ib: Access remote atomic for MRs

Message ID 1743777955-2316-2-git-send-email-kotaranov@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series RDMA/mana_ib: extend MR support | expand

Commit Message

Konstantin Taranov April 4, 2025, 2:45 p.m. UTC
From: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@microsoft.com>

Add IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC to the valid flags for MRs and use
the corresponding flag bit during MR creation in the HW.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Leon Romanovsky April 9, 2025, 12:28 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 07:45:53AM -0700, Konstantin Taranov wrote:
> From: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@microsoft.com>
> 
> Add IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC to the valid flags for MRs and use
> the corresponding flag bit during MR creation in the HW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c
> index f99557e..e4a9f53 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c
> @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
>  
>  #include "mana_ib.h"
>  
> -#define VALID_MR_FLAGS                                                         \
> -	(IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ)
> +#define VALID_MR_FLAGS (IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ |\
> +			IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC)
>  
>  #define VALID_DMA_MR_FLAGS (IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE)
>  
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ mana_ib_verbs_to_gdma_access_flags(int access_flags)
>  	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ)
>  		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_READ;
>  
> +	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC)
> +		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_ATOMIC;

Can you enable this flag unconditionally without relation to running RW?

Thanks

> +
>  	return flags;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>
Konstantin Taranov April 10, 2025, 1:37 p.m. UTC | #2
> > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ mana_ib_verbs_to_gdma_access_flags(int
> access_flags)
> >  	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ)
> >  		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_READ;
> >
> > +	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC)
> > +		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_ATOMIC;
> 
> Can you enable this flag unconditionally without relation to running RW?

Yes, ATOMIC access does not depend on Remote Read and Remote Write.
I also do not see any conditions in other drivers.

- Konstantin

> 
> Thanks
> 
> > +
> >  	return flags;
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
Leon Romanovsky April 10, 2025, 1:54 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 01:37:00PM +0000, Konstantin Taranov wrote:
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ mana_ib_verbs_to_gdma_access_flags(int
> > access_flags)
> > >  	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ)
> > >  		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_READ;
> > >
> > > +	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC)
> > > +		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_ATOMIC;
> > 
> > Can you enable this flag unconditionally without relation to running RW?
> 
> Yes, ATOMIC access does not depend on Remote Read and Remote Write.

The question is "do you have FW which doesn't support
GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_ATOMIC? and what will happen if such flag used
for such FW?"

> I also do not see any conditions in other drivers.

At least for mlx5, we are checking FW capability if it is supported.
See get_unchangeable_access_flags().

> 
> - Konstantin
> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > > +
> > >  	return flags;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
Konstantin Taranov April 14, 2025, 9:15 a.m. UTC | #4
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 01:37:00PM +0000, Konstantin Taranov wrote:
> > > > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ mana_ib_verbs_to_gdma_access_flags(int
> > > access_flags)
> > > >  	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ)
> > > >  		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_READ;
> > > >
> > > > +	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC)
> > > > +		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_ATOMIC;
> > >
> > > Can you enable this flag unconditionally without relation to running RW?
> >
> > Yes, ATOMIC access does not depend on Remote Read and Remote Write.
> 
> The question is "do you have FW which doesn't support
> GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_ATOMIC? and what will happen if such flag
> used for such FW?"

As far as I am aware, all FW support this flag.
Nonetheless, if FW does not support it, the HW request to create MR will fail.

> 
> > I also do not see any conditions in other drivers.
> 
> At least for mlx5, we are checking FW capability if it is supported.
> See get_unchangeable_access_flags().
> 
> >
> > - Konstantin
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > > +
> > > >  	return flags;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.43.0
> > > >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c
index f99557e..e4a9f53 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mr.c
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ 
 
 #include "mana_ib.h"
 
-#define VALID_MR_FLAGS                                                         \
-	(IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ)
+#define VALID_MR_FLAGS (IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ |\
+			IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC)
 
 #define VALID_DMA_MR_FLAGS (IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE)
 
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@  mana_ib_verbs_to_gdma_access_flags(int access_flags)
 	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ)
 		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_READ;
 
+	if (access_flags & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC)
+		flags |= GDMA_ACCESS_FLAG_REMOTE_ATOMIC;
+
 	return flags;
 }