diff mbox series

[rdma-core] srp_daemon: improve the debug message for is_enabled_by_rules_file

Message ID 20190711024001.14648-1-honli@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [rdma-core] srp_daemon: improve the debug message for is_enabled_by_rules_file | expand

Commit Message

Honggang LI July 11, 2019, 2:40 a.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Honggang Li <honli@redhat.com>
---
 srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Bart Van Assche July 11, 2019, 6:29 p.m. UTC | #1
On 7/10/19 7:40 PM, Honggang Li wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Honggang Li <honli@redhat.com>
> ---
>  srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c b/srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c
> index a004f6a4..f27dd569 100644
> --- a/srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c
> +++ b/srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c
> @@ -349,10 +349,11 @@ static int is_enabled_by_rules_file(struct target_details *target)
>  	int rule;
>  	struct config_t *conf = config;
>  
> -	if (NULL == conf->rules)
> +	if (NULL == conf->rules) {
> +		pr_debug("SRP target with id_ext %s allowed by rules file\n", target->id_ext);
>  		return 1;
> +	}

How about changing that message into e.g. "Allowing SRP target with
id_ext %s because not using a rules file"?

> +		pr_debug("SRP target with id_ext %s %s by rules file\n",
> +				target->id_ext,
> +				conf->rules[rule].allow == 1 ? "allowed" : "disallowed");
>  		return conf->rules[rule].allow;

Is the "== 1" part necessary?

Otherwise this patch looks good to me.

Thanks,

Bart.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c b/srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c
index a004f6a4..f27dd569 100644
--- a/srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c
+++ b/srp_daemon/srp_daemon.c
@@ -349,10 +349,11 @@  static int is_enabled_by_rules_file(struct target_details *target)
 	int rule;
 	struct config_t *conf = config;
 
-	if (NULL == conf->rules)
+	if (NULL == conf->rules) {
+		pr_debug("SRP target with id_ext %s allowed by rules file\n", target->id_ext);
 		return 1;
+	}
 
-	pr_debug("Found an SRP target with id_ext %s - check if it allowed by rules file\n", target->id_ext);
 	rule = -1;
 	do {
 		rule++;
@@ -392,6 +393,9 @@  static int is_enabled_by_rules_file(struct target_details *target)
 
 		target->options = conf->rules[rule].options;
 
+		pr_debug("SRP target with id_ext %s %s by rules file\n",
+				target->id_ext,
+				conf->rules[rule].allow == 1 ? "allowed" : "disallowed");
 		return conf->rules[rule].allow;
 
 	} while (1);