From patchwork Sun Jun 9 17:33:51 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn_Sloth_T=C3=B8nnesen?= X-Patchwork-Id: 13691314 Received: from mail1.fiberby.net (mail1.fiberby.net [193.104.135.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64221DDBD; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.104.135.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717954502; cv=none; b=WY/IphA9K95zY9V6y1s9KmYZehH96z4bp3HznCbnSH0jrYhL1rFvMJt9BWWJLZKSSkUmsjSKhlpL1ShH1gPX9MR1+k0MPjAUcvXYQxrxeq86EOGAHusCp/eFGGUffv4wxrE2+1OHTgx/Vjj97R9/DBseOF3iY9TEGiAV1O9X0ag= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717954502; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cl0aiIt/dZ9YtxYR73dSSBkiTYMjyEA8XSxLZyngtK0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VqRX9UYiBDs/wqN/BqpW/VHGdE9K58RJpiJBG5c4sjtvjPQjmjTOUz6Rb/yAVlx/HEzu+TIaXJ71CsXn/A9QcFsWL3WYonDOKOS+JslO/EhEdQtFzsthVIpHA3s8IKgS8uh9NkZSAedGogNjfxQryOgSlkD0/v4G/vImZmjJvFQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=fiberby.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fiberby.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fiberby.net header.i=@fiberby.net header.b=Wwg+YYBt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.104.135.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=fiberby.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fiberby.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fiberby.net header.i=@fiberby.net header.b="Wwg+YYBt" Received: from x201s (193-104-135-243.ip4.fiberby.net [193.104.135.243]) by mail1.fiberby.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09296600B7; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:34:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fiberby.net; s=202008; t=1717954494; bh=cl0aiIt/dZ9YtxYR73dSSBkiTYMjyEA8XSxLZyngtK0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Wwg+YYBtm2XkgMY8PmuH/t/5FPrAPDtG/4EAGWw0yHJp/rJevS53Cz3wAgOV2AkS6 6twxiIYhYjrC5317y6NvKdibxyILjacUAJMlXy1Xh3H4iyVYokzkpzq84FA9EFBWgS Jv4NwEjxTX+fZQhja2sbyI4M8WjmfPe6+T+QcjiIcf5WIQr/tzYhyNZMH/KtIVki71 EOX1xjQ5+z0b7A1HGkfWK1F+Ws3lrAPgZiaobkokOhKLcD3BBybjnIkAAIsc/6ia1d +OjOOKU9n7UdLP5hCQ+nw0F3TfiKCR0FwFzC5HnK/7kUkkWLE27Q1IRdrStBGjqfyt Wn7llF2lrlppQ== Received: by x201s (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D566D204209; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 17:34:26 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn_Sloth_T=C3=B8nnesen?= To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn_Sloth_T=C3=B8nnesen?= , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Edward Cree , Martin Habets , linux-net-drivers@amd.com, Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , Tariq Toukan , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Louis Peens , oss-drivers@corigine.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davide Caratti , i.maximets@ovn.org Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/5] flow_offload: add encapsulation control flag helpers Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:33:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20240609173358.193178-2-ast@fiberby.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.1 In-Reply-To: <20240609173358.193178-1-ast@fiberby.net> References: <20240609173358.193178-1-ast@fiberby.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 This patch adds two new helper functions: flow_rule_is_supp_enc_control_flags() flow_rule_has_enc_control_flags() They are intended to be used for validating encapsulation control flags, and compliment the similar helpers without "enc_" in the name. The only difference is that they have their own error message, to make it obvious if an unsupported flag error is related to FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CONTROL or FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL. flow_rule_has_enc_control_flags() is for drivers supporting FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL, but not supporting any encapsulation control flags. (Currently all 4 drivers fits this category) flow_rule_is_supp_enc_control_flags() is currently only used for the above helper, but should also be used by drivers once they implement at least one encapsulation control flag. There is AFAICT currently no need for an "enc_" variant of flow_rule_match_has_control_flags(), as all drivers currently supporting FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL, are already calling flow_rule_match_enc_control() directly. Only compile tested. Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen --- include/net/flow_offload.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/net/flow_offload.h b/include/net/flow_offload.h index ec9f80509f60c..292cd8f4b762a 100644 --- a/include/net/flow_offload.h +++ b/include/net/flow_offload.h @@ -471,6 +471,28 @@ static inline bool flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags(const u32 supp_flags, return false; } +/** + * flow_rule_is_supp_enc_control_flags() - check for supported control flags + * @supp_enc_flags: encapsulation control flags supported by driver + * @enc_ctrl_flags: encapsulation control flags present in rule + * @extack: The netlink extended ACK for reporting errors. + * + * Return: true if only supported control flags are set, false otherwise. + */ +static inline bool flow_rule_is_supp_enc_control_flags(const u32 supp_enc_flags, + const u32 enc_ctrl_flags, + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) +{ + if (likely((enc_ctrl_flags & ~supp_enc_flags) == 0)) + return true; + + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, + "Unsupported match on enc_control.flags %#x", + enc_ctrl_flags); + + return false; +} + /** * flow_rule_has_control_flags() - check for presence of any control flags * @ctrl_flags: control flags present in rule @@ -484,6 +506,19 @@ static inline bool flow_rule_has_control_flags(const u32 ctrl_flags, return !flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags(0, ctrl_flags, extack); } +/** + * flow_rule_has_enc_control_flags() - check for presence of any control flags + * @enc_ctrl_flags: encapsulation control flags present in rule + * @extack: The netlink extended ACK for reporting errors. + * + * Return: true if control flags are set, false otherwise. + */ +static inline bool flow_rule_has_enc_control_flags(const u32 enc_ctrl_flags, + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) +{ + return !flow_rule_is_supp_enc_control_flags(0, enc_ctrl_flags, extack); +} + /** * flow_rule_match_has_control_flags() - match and check for any control flags * @rule: The flow_rule under evaluation.