Message ID | 6-v3-1893cd8b9369+1925-mlx5_arm_wc_jgg@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Jason Gunthorpe |
Headers | show |
Series | Fix mlx5 write combining support on new ARM64 cores | expand |
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:46:19PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > mlx5 has a built in self-test at driver startup to evaluate if the > platform supports write combining to generate a 64 byte PCIe TLP or > not. This has proven necessary because a lot of common scenarios end up > with broken write combining (especially inside virtual machines) and there > is other way to learn this information. > > This self test has been consistently failing on new ARM64 CPU > designs (specifically with NVIDIA Grace's implementation of Neoverse > V2). The C loop around writeq() generates some pretty terrible ARM64 > assembly, but historically this has worked on a lot of existing ARM64 CPUs > till now. > > We see it succeed about 1 time in 10,000 on the worst effected > systems. The CPU architects speculate that the load instructions > interspersed with the stores makes the WC buffers statistically flush too > often and thus the generation of large TLPs becomes infrequent. This makes > the boot up test unreliable in that it indicates no write-combining, > however userspace would be fine since it uses a ST4 instruction. > > Further, S390 has similar issues where only the special zpci_memcpy_toio() > will actually generate large TLPs, and the open coded loop does not > trigger it at all. > > Fix both ARM64 and S390 by switching to __iowrite64_copy() which now > provides architecture specific variants that have a high change of > generating a large TLP with write combining. x86 continues to use a > similar writeq loop in the generate __iowrite64_copy(). > > Fixes: 11f552e21755 ("IB/mlx5: Test write combining support") > Tested-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mem.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Thanks, Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mem.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mem.c index 96ffbbaf0a73d1..5a22be14d958f2 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mem.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mem.c @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ * SOFTWARE. */ +#include <linux/io.h> #include <rdma/ib_umem_odp.h> #include "mlx5_ib.h" #include <linux/jiffies.h> @@ -108,7 +109,6 @@ static int post_send_nop(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct ib_qp *ibqp, u64 wr_id, __be32 mmio_wqe[16] = {}; unsigned long flags; unsigned int idx; - int i; if (unlikely(dev->mdev->state == MLX5_DEVICE_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR)) return -EIO; @@ -148,10 +148,8 @@ static int post_send_nop(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct ib_qp *ibqp, u64 wr_id, * we hit doorbell */ wmb(); - for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) - mlx5_write64(&mmio_wqe[i * 2], - bf->bfreg->map + bf->offset + i * 8); - io_stop_wc(); + __iowrite64_copy(bf->bfreg->map + bf->offset, mmio_wqe, + sizeof(mmio_wqe) / 8); bf->offset ^= bf->buf_size;