Message ID | 20200416161331.7606-1-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | remoteproc: Decorelate virtio from core | expand |
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 06:13:13PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > This series proposes to introduce the notion of platform device for the > rproc virtio management. One obective is to allow virtio to declare is > own memory resources without the usage of dma_declare_coherent_memory > that seems deprecated since the introduction of the device tree. Just to follow up with the rest of the community... During the openAMP remoteproc sub-group conference call [1] Arnaud and I have agreed the best way forward for this patchset is to split it up and make a few adjustment that will make it easier for people to review the work. Thanks, Mathieu [1]. These conference call are open to anyone who wishes to participate. > > Proposal: > - the rproc virtio is processed in a separate platform and could be handled > as a generic platform device. > - Several vdev devices can be declared in DT: > - which allows to declare their own memory regions and answer to [1]. > - as next steps it would be also possible to: > - declare their own mailboxes, rpmsg drivers, ... > - use dma-range to handle the pa<->da translation at virtio level > > Several notions are introduced here: > - Virtio platform registration which allows to decorelate virtio from the > remote proc core device. > - Synchronization of the child devices relying on component bind/unbind. > This mechanism ensures the synchronization of the child devices before > the boot of the remote processor and before the release of the resources > on the remote processor shutdown. > - Ability to populate child devices declared in rproc device tree node. > - Possibility to declare the memory regions reserved to a virtio devices in > the devicetree. > > Known limitations: > - the patchset has been tested on a st32mP1 plaform only > - it is based on the v5.6 (need to evoluate depending on V5.7 and on going > patchsets). > - The virtio memory allocation does not take into account memory > controllers such as IOMMU and MPU. > > Arnaud Pouliquen (18): > remoteproc: Store resource table address in rvdev > remoteproc: Introduce virtio device add/remove functions in core. > remoteproc: Move rvdev management in rproc_virtio > remoteproc: Add rproc_get_by_node helper > remoteproc: Create platform device for vdev > remoteproc: Add component in core for child devices synchronization > remoteproc: Add component bind/unbind for virtio platform > remoteproc: Externalize carveout functions > remoteproc: Move vring management from core to virtio > remoteproc: Add capability to populate rproc subnode devices > remoteproc: Add child node component in rproc match list > remoteproc: Support of pre-registered virtio device > remoteproc: Add memory default allocator helper > remoteproc: Add pa to da translation API > remoteproc: associate memory entry to a device > remoteproc: Parse virtio node for memory region > remoteproc: stm32: add the pa to da ops. > ARM: dts: stm32: Declare a virtio device > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi | 10 + > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 469 ++++++++++++----------- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 23 +- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 415 ++++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 1 + > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 27 +- > 6 files changed, 673 insertions(+), 272 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.17.1 >