Message ID | 20221005032257.80681-1-kch@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-remoteproc-owner@kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCBFC43217 for <linux-remoteproc@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 03:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229725AbiJEDXV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-remoteproc@archiver.kernel.org>); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 23:23:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56154 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229530AbiJEDXT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 23:23:19 -0400 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn7nam10on2047.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.92.47]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AAB719BF; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 20:23:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=EAnP4nz11d924n5Ea6rkfbTTWZkOcBMR/h7ZkQJ1oHltLxDJaeH/Iez5BS7J79qQ2VcFFwKYgIGmCiYXjOb76HvhXSy2EaAQdXrVxivVboL/NYUst26hybzA8F8XTgXAFdbEcsSJMarnV5z3mvpNv6/2qB++DsmW8q+cjiY5mYdZRhiZtGSYFd3lR+A2iFGBWA/Ij8OWKnFTulTcMU+8KAKsLHdCYRDn4ExerGOo0Cz+trXQUARNz81ypcs8fpGxbeso3FeGPHnm9ypVjlCvgTaHFSZVumbmAN2zpDwlny92lM3GEdkISUQHh9Y61BlOgXREHFsrbzCGQ5y2BJTFOg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=YrgGetB/TLOjMS3vQknhv/SINTgMiPk7KqpkdclIcUs=; b=Xdz1XM9XgHs5tzhGy60K1VMGf7QyJWaVPAJhDsbnmp5W/XTYb8Bi8f8nb1UQ9e1IMXiPYTTYFi+RlZ3dI4B1Y65Z0QQl37FH3c1C70lf2zoeoThJTzvL5pDhglUPoxYHgg6oC5ZPXVTzZ7fI8eRAMYUPXqTcCbnYF3bAL97S2ILwtM1l2jXOjFCoIw/7vNwUKgtUw5eRwCmMqR8F6tJ6kWA6QAr1QEgGdFMtX9EEuzAUXyUW/5oQ5M9j8wHfEwj0ontzAsr9fQnTHG8LgEDXWpyAJq2jM6WEwKhEfCq2J7ZwlH6dHyJLv/NzzbtfG8MmACbtqAtD5iuTsSetceIsug== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.117.161) smtp.rcpttodomain=vger.kernel.org smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YrgGetB/TLOjMS3vQknhv/SINTgMiPk7KqpkdclIcUs=; b=iW3jsrpo9QXt4SmTdh80KE4thGPDh8fejFIagobwIQSERcoWvLGWdLcnqwJhThlAROWm8mvRxQA47EVCi2eq5eIqa5WE0yHiZwRofiP/64oBAIcTBy9/FMHs0x/UhCYe76qnqD/RIxdsnzqz50SrhQQ5XHpX7WIjLrthz2kNv59+A3mkKtYd3h3MQR4rPdtfo4TK1QbuPLEW/MLJ9voFSb02DML6kB8S+aqt7c7YeYtZ6sH/cLX22f9gL/69KTjRMugSIK3H29HTjUPGFQd45Kix5z6Vce1d/4Amspy1WZOvPhvdO4CpC2PD1IOhhn2ZmJ7Dkg4nMNlIVcZcz5zeig== Received: from BN8PR04CA0001.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:70::14) by DM6PR12MB4863.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1b9::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5676.24; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 03:23:16 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT062.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:70:cafe::c8) by BN8PR04CA0001.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:70::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5676.26 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 03:23:16 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.117.161) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.117.161 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.117.161; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.117.161) by BN8NAM11FT062.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5709.10 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 03:23:16 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.200.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.26; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 20:23:08 -0700 Received: from dev.nvidia.com (10.126.230.35) by rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.29; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 20:23:05 -0700 From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com> To: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org> CC: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <efremov@linux.com>, <josef@toxicpanda.com>, <idryomov@gmail.com>, <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>, <haris.iqbal@ionos.com>, <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>, <mst@redhat.com>, <jasowang@redhat.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <stefanha@redhat.com>, <ohad@wizery.com>, <andersson@kernel.org>, <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>, <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, <richard@nod.at>, <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <marcan@marcan.st>, <sven@svenpeter.dev>, <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>, <kbusch@kernel.org>, <hch@lst.de>, <sagi@grimberg.me>, <sth@linux.ibm.com>, <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>, <hca@linux.ibm.com>, <gor@linux.ibm.com>, <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>, <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>, <svens@linux.ibm.com>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <hare@suse.de>, <kch@nvidia.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>, <john.garry@huawei.com>, <mcgrof@kernel.org>, <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>, <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>, <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>, <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>, <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>, <bvanassche@acm.org>, <ming.lei@redhat.com>, <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>, <vincent.fu@samsung.com>, <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>, <joel@jms.id.au>, <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>, <nbd@other.debian.org>, <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <asahi@lists.linux.dev> Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/21] block: add and use init tagset helper Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 20:22:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20221005032257.80681-1-kch@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.126.230.35] X-ClientProxiedBy: rnnvmail203.nvidia.com (10.129.68.9) To rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN8NAM11FT062:EE_|DM6PR12MB4863:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: fce348ec-947a-4641-efb6-08daa680f183 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.117.161;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:dc6edge2.nvidia.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230022)(4636009)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(451199015)(46966006)(40470700004)(36840700001)(7696005)(41300700001)(36756003)(6666004)(82740400003)(5660300002)(7366002)(7406005)(7416002)(8936002)(26005)(8676002)(316002)(70206006)(70586007)(4326008)(336012)(40480700001)(83380400001)(47076005)(426003)(82310400005)(16526019)(186003)(1076003)(921005)(356005)(7636003)(40460700003)(2906002)(2616005)(36860700001)(478600001)(110136005)(54906003)(21314003)(2101003)(83996005);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2022 03:23:16.2764 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fce348ec-947a-4641-efb6-08daa680f183 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.117.161];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT062.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR12MB4863 Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-remoteproc.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
block: add and use init tagset helper
|
expand
|
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 08:22:36PM -0700, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > Add and use the helper to initialize the common fields of the tag_set > such as blk_mq_ops, number of h/w queues, queue depth, command size, > numa_node, timeout, BLK_MQ_F_XXX flags, driver data. This initialization > is spread all over the block drivers. This avoids repetation of > inialization code of the tag set in current block drivers and any future > ones. > > P.S. I'm aware of the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() checkpatch warn just to make > get some feedback to so I can remove the RFC tag. > *If* there were commonalities at init and these could be broken up into common groups, each having their own set of calls, then we simplify and can abstract these. I say this without doing a complete review of the removals, but if there really isn't much of commonalities I tend to agree with Bart that open coding this is better. Luis
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 11:26:13AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > *If* there were commonalities at init and these could be broken up into > common groups, each having their own set of calls, then we simplify and > can abstract these. I say this without doing a complete review of the > removals, but if there really isn't much of commonalities I tend to > agree with Bart that open coding this is better. The commonality is that there are various required or optional fields to fill out. I actually have a WIP series to make the tag_set dynamically allocated and refcounted to fix some long standing life time issues. That creates a new alloc helper that will take a few mandatory arguments and would heavily clash with this series.