From patchwork Wed Aug 31 20:50:07 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Loic PALLARDY X-Patchwork-Id: 9307857 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC0260487 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503A4290B2 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 44AC4290BA; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:55:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE60290B2 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760702AbcHaUvJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:51:09 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:42891 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760644AbcHaUvG (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:51:06 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046037.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0046037.ppops.net (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u7VKnAFU008650; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:51:01 +0200 Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 255btaaqx3-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:51:01 +0200 Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (zeta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 8173A34; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:51:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (Safex1hubcas23.st.com [10.75.90.46]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 5C8B450E5; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:51:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (10.129.5.21) by webmail-ga.st.com (10.75.90.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.279.2; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:50:59 +0200 From: Loic Pallardy To: , , CC: , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 04/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to append a new resource table entry Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:50:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1472676622-32533-5-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1472676622-32533-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com> References: <1472676622-32533-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.129.5.21] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-08-31_04:, , signatures=0 Sender: linux-remoteproc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Lee Jones A new function now exists to pull in and amend and existing resource table entry. But what if we wish to provide a new resource? This function provides functionality to append a brand new resource entry onto the resource table. All complexity related to shuffling parts of the table around, providing new offsets and incriminating number of entries in the resource table's top-level header is taken care of here. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 330ad4f..c2887be 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -978,6 +978,61 @@ static int rproc_update_resource_table_entry(struct rproc *rproc, return !updated; } +static struct resource_table* +rproc_add_resource_table_entry(struct rproc *rproc, + struct rproc_request_resource *request, + struct resource_table *old_table, int *tablesz) +{ + struct resource_table *table; + struct fw_rsc_hdr h; + void *new_rsc_loc; + void *fw_header_loc; + void *start_of_rscs; + int new_rsc_offset; + int size = *tablesz; + int i; + + h.type = request->type; + + new_rsc_offset = size; + + /* + * Allocate another contiguous chunk of memory, large enough to + * contain the new, expanded resource table. + * + * The +4 is for the extra offset[] element in the top level header + */ + size += sizeof(struct fw_rsc_hdr) + request->size + 4; + table = devm_kmemdup(&rproc->dev, old_table, size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!table) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + /* Shunt table by 4 Bytes to account for the extra offset[] element */ + start_of_rscs = (void *)table + table->offset[0]; + memmove(start_of_rscs + 4, + start_of_rscs, new_rsc_offset - table->offset[0]); + new_rsc_offset += 4; + + /* Update existing resource entry's offsets */ + for (i = 0; i < table->num; i++) + table->offset[i] += 4; + + /* Update the top level 'resource table' header */ + table->offset[table->num] = new_rsc_offset; + table->num++; + + /* Copy new firmware header into table */ + fw_header_loc = (void *)table + new_rsc_offset; + memcpy(fw_header_loc, &h, sizeof(h)); + + /* Copy new resource entry into table */ + new_rsc_loc = (void *)fw_header_loc + sizeof(h); + memcpy(new_rsc_loc, request->resource, request->size); + + *tablesz = size; + return table; +} + /* * take a firmware and boot a remote processor with it. */