Message ID | 1519921440-21356-2-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 4170dfb..56b33e4 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -654,7 +654,15 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc, * to use the iommu-based DMA API: we expect 'dma' to contain the * physical address in this case. */ - if (rproc->domain) { + + if (rsc->da != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY && !rproc->domain) { + dev_err(dev->parent, + "Bad carveout rsc configuration\n"); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto dma_free; + } + + if (rsc->da != FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY && rproc->domain) { mapping = kzalloc(sizeof(*mapping), GFP_KERNEL); if (!mapping) { ret = -ENOMEM;
If there is no IOMMU associate to remote processor device, remoteproc_core won't be able to satisfy device address requested in firmware resource table. Return an error as configuration won't be coherent. Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)