| Message ID | c08a834989a8ffa841c457129d13b7a11361ec51.1529654288.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:09:04PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: > Now the hwlock core has supplied new function to get a specific hwlock id > by one hwlock name, which is more clear for users. So change to use > of_hwspin_lock_get_id_byname(). Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c index 6fc50cf..d8d5e2f 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static int sprd_adi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) sadi->slave_pbase = res->start + ADI_SLAVE_OFFSET; sadi->ctlr = ctlr; sadi->dev = &pdev->dev; - ret = of_hwspin_lock_get_id(np, 0); + ret = of_hwspin_lock_get_id_byname(np, "adi"); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can not get the hardware spinlock\n"); goto put_ctlr;
Now the hwlock core has supplied new function to get a specific hwlock id by one hwlock name, which is more clear for users. So change to use of_hwspin_lock_get_id_byname(). Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> --- drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)