| Message ID | 1456361514-18765-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote: > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE. > > This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to > ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more > appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Depending on whether important patches arrive for sh-pfc, I will queue this for v4.6 or v4.7. Is that OK for you? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:55:33AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Simon Horman > <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote: > > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE. > > > > This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to > > ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more > > appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > > Depending on whether important patches arrive for sh-pfc, I will queue this for > v4.6 or v4.7. Is that OK for you? Yes, either is fine for me.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote: > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE. > > This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to > ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more > appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Expecting Geert to queue this for me. Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/Kconfig index 35d6e95fa21f..9cf9af080bab 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/Kconfig @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ # Renesas SH and SH Mobile PINCTRL drivers # -if ARCH_SHMOBILE || SUPERH +if ARCH_RENESAS || SUPERH config PINCTRL_SH_PFC select GPIO_SH_PFC if ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE. This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs. Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> --- drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Based on the for-next branch of the linux-pinctrl tree