| Message ID | 1463646557-22489-1-git-send-email-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:29:17AM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > New drivers should not use dma_request_slave_channel_reason() but > dma_request_chan(). The former is a macro to the later so this change do > not effect the driver in any way. > > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> Applied to for-next, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c index c42d52a..cf82438 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static struct dma_chan *rcar_i2c_request_dma_chan(struct device *dev, char *chan_name = dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV ? "tx" : "rx"; int ret; - chan = dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, chan_name); + chan = dma_request_chan(dev, chan_name); if (IS_ERR(chan)) { ret = PTR_ERR(chan); dev_dbg(dev, "request_channel failed for %s (%d)\n",
New drivers should not use dma_request_slave_channel_reason() but dma_request_chan(). The former is a macro to the later so this change do not effect the driver in any way. Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)