| Message ID | 1eb6b81c-500e-ef21-7c21-e8bc7a1ff227@cogentembedded.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote: > Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB > device, so document the SoC specific bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:27:12PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov > <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote: > > Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB > > device, so document the SoC specific bindings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:13:45PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB > device, so document the SoC specific bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> > > --- > The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's > applied to 'net.git' instead. :-) > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
On 02/01/2018 11:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB > device, so document the SoC specific bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> > > --- > The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's > applied to 'net.git' instead. :-) David, I see this patch was marked as "not applicable" in patchwork. Why, because it was posted during the merge window? MNBR, Sergei
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 21:01:15 +0300 > On 02/01/2018 11:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > >> Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB >> device, so document the SoC specific bindings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> >> >> --- >> The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's >> applied to 'net.git' instead. :-) > > David, I see this patch was marked as "not applicable" in patchwork. Why, because > it was posted during the merge window? No because I thought the relevant architecture tree would take a mere DT update.
Hello!
On 2/25/2018 5:53 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>> Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB >>> device, so document the SoC specific bindings.>>>>>> Signed-off-by:
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>>>>>>> --->>> The patch is
against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's>>> applied to
'net.git' instead. :-)>>>> David, I see this patch was marked as "not
applicable" in patchwork. Why, because>> it was posted during the merge
window?> > No because I thought the relevant architecture tree would take a
mere> DT update.
Well, so far the binding updates have been merged via the appropriate
driver subsystem trees, look at e.g. this patch:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/813037/
MBR, Sergei
On 02/25/2018 11:48 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>>> Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB >>> device, so document the SoC specific bindings.>>>>>> Signed-off-by: > Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>>>>>>> --->>> The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's>>> applied to 'net.git' instead. :-)>>>> David, I see this patch was marked as "not applicable" in patchwork. Why, because>> it was posted during the merge window?> > No because I thought the relevant architecture tree would take a mere> DT update. Sorry for this crap -- I was testing my new mini-keyboard and something went wrong... MBR, Sergei
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:53:17PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> > Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 21:01:15 +0300 > > > On 02/01/2018 11:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > > >> Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB > >> device, so document the SoC specific bindings. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> > >> > >> --- > >> The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's > >> applied to 'net.git' instead. :-) > > > > David, I see this patch was marked as "not applicable" in patchwork. Why, because > > it was posted during the merge window? > > No because I thought the relevant architecture tree would take a mere > DT update. Hi Dave, I am happy to take these kinds of changes for the ravb and sh_eth drivers if that is your preference. I am also just as happy for you to take them, which I think has been the case for similar changes in the past.
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:58:24 +0100 > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:53:17PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> >> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 21:01:15 +0300 >> >> > On 02/01/2018 11:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> > >> >> Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB >> >> device, so document the SoC specific bindings. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> >> >> >> >> --- >> >> The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's >> >> applied to 'net.git' instead. :-) >> > >> > David, I see this patch was marked as "not applicable" in patchwork. Why, because >> > it was posted during the merge window? >> >> No because I thought the relevant architecture tree would take a mere >> DT update. > > Hi Dave, > > I am happy to take these kinds of changes for the ravb and sh_eth drivers > if that is your preference. I am also just as happy for you to take them, > which I think has been the case for similar changes in the past. No, it's not a problem. Applied to 'net', thanks.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 03:10:51PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> > Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:58:24 +0100 > > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:53:17PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> > >> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 21:01:15 +0300 > >> > >> > On 02/01/2018 11:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > >> > > >> >> Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB > >> >> device, so document the SoC specific bindings. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> > >> >> > >> >> --- > >> >> The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's > >> >> applied to 'net.git' instead. :-) > >> > > >> > David, I see this patch was marked as "not applicable" in patchwork. Why, because > >> > it was posted during the merge window? > >> > >> No because I thought the relevant architecture tree would take a mere > >> DT update. > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > I am happy to take these kinds of changes for the ravb and sh_eth drivers > > if that is your preference. I am also just as happy for you to take them, > > which I think has been the case for similar changes in the past. > > No, it's not a problem. Applied to 'net', thanks. Great, thanks.
Index: net-next/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt =================================================================== --- net-next.orig/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt +++ net-next/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Required properties: - "renesas,etheravb-r8a7795" for the R8A7795 SoC. - "renesas,etheravb-r8a7796" for the R8A7796 SoC. - "renesas,etheravb-r8a77970" for the R8A77970 SoC. + - "renesas,etheravb-r8a77980" for the R8A77980 SoC. - "renesas,etheravb-r8a77995" for the R8A77995 SoC. - "renesas,etheravb-rcar-gen3" as a fallback for the above R-Car Gen3 devices.
Renesas R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC has the R-Car gen3 compatible EtherAVB device, so document the SoC specific bindings. Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> --- The patch is against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo but I wouldn't mind if it's applied to 'net.git' instead. :-) Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)