| Message ID | 66c0b103-ed6e-36e0-74a6-9809ba55939c@cogentembedded.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:07:44PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > I've successfully tested eMMC on R8A77980/Condor. R8A77980 has a single > SDHI core anyway, so can't be a subject of the known RX DMA errata... Lucky you ;) > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
On 19 April 2018 at 22:09, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:07:44PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> I've successfully tested eMMC on R8A77980/Condor. R8A77980 has a single >> SDHI core anyway, so can't be a subject of the known RX DMA errata... > > Lucky you ;) > >> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> > Seems like this one also should go for fixes/stable then? Kind regards Uffe
Hello! On 4/20/2018 10:08 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> I've successfully tested eMMC on R8A77980/Condor. R8A77980 has a single >>> SDHI core anyway, so can't be a subject of the known RX DMA errata... Should have been s/of/to/, I think. >> Lucky you ;) >> >>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> >> >> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> >> > Seems like this one also should go for fixes/stable then? In its current form it's only good for the next branch. Recasting/merging it for the fixes branch will result in the rejects in the next branch where you have already merged Wolfram's patches. The decision is up to you, of course... > Kind regards > Uffe MBR, Sergei
On 19 April 2018 at 22:07, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote: > I've successfully tested eMMC on R8A77980/Condor. R8A77980 has a single > SDHI core anyway, so can't be a subject of the known RX DMA errata... > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Thanks, applied for next! Kind regards Uffe > > --- > This patch is against the 'next' branch of Ulf Hansson's 'mmc.git' repo. > > drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > Index: mmc/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c > =================================================================== > --- mmc.orig/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c > +++ mmc/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c > @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ static const struct soc_device_attribute > /* generic ones */ > { .soc_id = "r8a7795" }, > { .soc_id = "r8a7796" }, > + { .soc_id = "r8a77980" }, > { .soc_id = "r8a77995" }, > { /* sentinel */ } > };
Index: mmc/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c =================================================================== --- mmc.orig/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c +++ mmc/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ static const struct soc_device_attribute /* generic ones */ { .soc_id = "r8a7795" }, { .soc_id = "r8a7796" }, + { .soc_id = "r8a77980" }, { .soc_id = "r8a77995" }, { /* sentinel */ } };
I've successfully tested eMMC on R8A77980/Condor. R8A77980 has a single SDHI core anyway, so can't be a subject of the known RX DMA errata... Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> --- This patch is against the 'next' branch of Ulf Hansson's 'mmc.git' repo. drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)