[v2,0/2] RISC-V: Use BIT_ULL(x) instead of 1ULL << x

Message ID	20250205204129.10639-1-palmer@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive)
Headers	show Return-Path: <linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] RISC-V: Use BIT_ULL(x) instead of 1ULL << x Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:40:25 -0800 Message-ID: <20250205204129.10639-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: alex@ghiti.fr, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>, Mr.Bossman075@gmail.com From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Precedence: list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" <linux-riscv-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org
Series	RISC-V: Use BIT_ULL(x) instead of 1ULL << x \| expand [v2,0/2] RISC-V: Use BIT_ULL(x) instead of 1ULL << x [v2,1/2] RISC-V: hwprobe: Use BIT macro to avoid warnings [v2,2/2] RISC-V: Use BIT_ULL(x) instead of 1ULL << x

Message ID

20250205204129.10639-1-palmer@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive)

Headers

Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] RISC-V: Use BIT_ULL(x) instead of 1ULL << x
Date: Wed,  5 Feb 2025 12:40:25 -0800
Message-ID: <20250205204129.10639-1-palmer@rivosinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: alex@ghiti.fr, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
 Mr.Bossman075@gmail.com
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Precedence: list
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "linux-riscv" <linux-riscv-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: 
 linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org

Series

RISC-V: Use BIT_ULL(x) instead of 1ULL << x | expand

This was way back in the patch queue and had some feedback. I needed to re-spin it to pick up the first patch anyway, so I figured I'd just do the rest too.