From patchwork Mon Mar 25 10:12:59 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yash Shah X-Patchwork-Id: 10868737 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1941390 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A562915F for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 76B2929285; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:13:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B222915F for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:13:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=P9bgj8+W+UCABP5Y8mL0lteOH66RPRE2FhJzRMzF/qM=; b=gAGJQwJ+XEYCUoQEOB8YsDO/nJ ibTgqTD8vrFBKkqM7EjyvI3r/AA4QUB7+v3jOB1CHNVo9lqmzlA3K1oJCwzC8BhA9n5OFxLY9AyG+ BYsLMz/cC84EAmi8T7bn5IoFyxJpvDtgf+GGP/v29BDg6ZLELy50s1tyO323JKh9fn7QvRFQB4BW6 KgOa5h56nbz71mFb9paIlGwGdOa0yWNzSDOxlfLp5x2f9m98X2l0NLFttCHB3/qbyhVqtipUbqsCq 8XtDhfoh//tb1rYe76EP4YSX/FMZ2z7Vzk07bxsFrC8v9bElFcrZvpHVW082DE+Vh+bUxQtnLuXMq l68HkGKg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h8Mbn-0000JL-D0; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:13:35 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h8Mbk-0000Ij-2w for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:13:34 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id 10so6074751pfo.5 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 03:13:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=RdU0HXcdNPeRJH0qDIHvqh6U/3Vd325g1P7G8YSBZL0=; b=bdfhX6yO9yWDvYsshVaUqT01Gf1QzM9QyF5wkzB0+vc52bDXNbV5cBDMaB2qWnvHod 34Ql6V4FiwYYeqIjvTJWDatot4/wLApwjwQWSkX/mR3j+uLQA7M88gd2UbPiCN5s7SKF dND9MgGyblzdm/CCaELF4M0SATfnFynnKKMDAkw0We9hqOgbAeCnj5ClDIMvcnFR5vo5 n5BPQagi2mGGymNyYSqT1MIBRRg2ER8bceTg+afnXuHxq0nDrTLJb07W2+TM2VTKGb1M fhMg7OzukA6+MiweLL/TaWzY7Cpa+Y50MLa5YKXoUPFPnpZRRBbN5rT4GcS/XbqZQ8tY /b8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=RdU0HXcdNPeRJH0qDIHvqh6U/3Vd325g1P7G8YSBZL0=; b=kb23Vb1lj4uYAatxGMgQhi3aSMv63YJ0jFDCa3r0bGoW2g+NXkz0ZHb2u/ncslVDgl TkBxtL/bdd7x+4fEggmAHkS9LYu9O24xacCYCgfW/AeMZYxQ6E0zDXhFXT0ZBQToGY6O DqVjo4CdRW29XrHWWl31iw0kt4qxoKVxK4PXkTrZ+uzCg9v0gwr3PVv65eI4lvOB6RAD l9UYbaKl3y2v8Nw9QCI7ql/3efYWwHe/ytjzrCuXNCZU9wTTfnNIeyqEaSQasQYMFHFX eAI6dNxnSGplecWns78CzhLAhF+PaKxakWCdRclS9TF2ivZM7ZFc5oeimsGlpIdP8KQY Wz8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWbXacxnfD/cHbl3S5xN8aszhF+jz/OXSCx6mYNTrpv/Ht0exZ5 OnUu+38JjSBs1I7KR8bPXRehkA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwg7Lqdgoj4HVrlDCutw4/Rl7GxACjHdnfoSr3nPhwTGWn8e3GJjiDI89Mi4gZK6pZ6buLoUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6ac1:: with SMTP id f184mr3271371pgc.25.1553508810560; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 03:13:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buildserver-90.open-silicon.com ([114.143.65.226]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v82sm30151298pfa.170.2019.03.25.03.13.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 03:13:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Yash Shah To: palmer@sifive.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v11 2/2] pwm: sifive: Add a driver for SiFive SoC PWM Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:42:59 +0530 Message-Id: <1553508779-9685-3-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1553508779-9685-1-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> References: <1553508779-9685-1-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190325_031332_128498_D7A4ADBA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, sachin.ghadi@sifive.com, Yash Shah , thierry.reding@gmail.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+patchwork-linux-riscv=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Adds a PWM driver for PWM chip present in SiFive's HiFive Unleashed SoC. Signed-off-by: Wesley W. Terpstra [Atish: Various fixes and code cleanup] Signed-off-by: Atish Patra Signed-off-by: Yash Shah --- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 11 ++ drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 + drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c | 338 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 350 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig index a8f47df..4a61d1a 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig @@ -380,6 +380,17 @@ config PWM_SAMSUNG To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be called pwm-samsung. +config PWM_SIFIVE + tristate "SiFive PWM support" + depends on OF + depends on COMMON_CLK + depends on RISCV || COMPILE_TEST + help + Generic PWM framework driver for SiFive SoCs. + + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module + will be called pwm-sifive. + config PWM_SPEAR tristate "STMicroelectronics SPEAr PWM support" depends on PLAT_SPEAR diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile index 9c676a0..30089ca 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RCAR) += pwm-rcar.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_TPU) += pwm-renesas-tpu.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP) += pwm-rockchip.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SAMSUNG) += pwm-samsung.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SIFIVE) += pwm-sifive.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SPEAR) += pwm-spear.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STI) += pwm-sti.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STM32) += pwm-stm32.o diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1921e6ea --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c @@ -0,0 +1,338 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2017-2018 SiFive + * For SiFive's PWM IP block documentation please refer Chapter 14 of + * Reference Manual : https://static.dev.sifive.com/FU540-C000-v1.0.pdf + * + * Limitations: + * - When changing both duty cycle and period, we cannot prevent in + * software that the output might produce a period with mixed + * settings (new period length and old duty cycle). + * - The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle. + * - The hardware generates only inverted output. + */ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* Register offsets */ +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG 0x0 +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCOUNT 0x8 +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMS 0x10 +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP0 0x20 + +/* PWMCFG fields */ +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_SCALE GENMASK(3, 0) +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_STICKY BIT(8) +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_ZERO_CMP BIT(9) +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_DEGLITCH BIT(10) +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_EN_ALWAYS BIT(12) +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_EN_ONCE BIT(13) +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_CENTER BIT(16) +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_GANG BIT(24) +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_IP BIT(28) + +/* PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP is used to calculate offset for pwmcmpX registers */ +#define PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP 4 +#define PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH 16 +#define PWM_SIFIVE_DEFAULT_PERIOD 10000000 + +struct pwm_sifive_ddata { + struct pwm_chip chip; + struct mutex lock; /* lock to protect user_count */ + struct notifier_block notifier; + struct clk *clk; + void __iomem *regs; + unsigned int real_period; + unsigned int approx_period; + int user_count; +}; + +static inline +struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(struct pwm_chip *c) +{ + return container_of(c, struct pwm_sifive_ddata, chip); +} + +static int pwm_sifive_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) +{ + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); + + mutex_lock(&ddata->lock); + ddata->user_count++; + mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock); + + return 0; +} + +static void pwm_sifive_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) +{ + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); + + mutex_lock(&ddata->lock); + ddata->user_count--; + mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock); +} + +static void pwm_sifive_update_clock(struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata, + unsigned long rate) +{ + unsigned long long num; + unsigned long scale_pow; + int scale; + u32 val; + /* + * The PWM unit is used with pwmzerocmp=0, so the only way to modify the + * period length is using pwmscale which provides the number of bits the + * counter is shifted before being feed to the comparators. A period + * lasts (1 << (PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH + pwmscale)) clock ticks. + * (1 << (PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH + scale)) * 10^9/rate = period + */ + scale_pow = div64_ul(ddata->approx_period * (u64)rate, NSEC_PER_SEC); + scale = clamp(ilog2(scale_pow) - PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH, 0, 0xf); + + val = PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_EN_ALWAYS | + FIELD_PREP(PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_SCALE, scale); + writel(val, ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG); + + /* As scale <= 15 the shift operation cannot overflow. */ + num = (unsigned long long)NSEC_PER_SEC << (PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH + scale); + ddata->real_period = div64_ul(num, rate); + dev_dbg(ddata->chip.dev, + "New real_period = %u ns\n", ddata->real_period); +} + +static void pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + struct pwm_state *state) +{ + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); + u32 duty, val; + + duty = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP0 + + pwm->hwpwm * PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP); + + state->enabled = duty > 0; + + val = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG); + if (!(val & PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_EN_ALWAYS)) + state->enabled = false; + + state->period = ddata->real_period; + state->duty_cycle = + (u64)duty * ddata->real_period >> PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH; + state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED; +} + +static int pwm_sifive_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable) +{ + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); + int ret; + + if (enable) { + ret = clk_enable(ddata->clk); + if (ret) { + dev_err(ddata->chip.dev, "Enable clk failed\n"); + return ret; + } + } + + if (!enable) + clk_disable(ddata->clk); + + return 0; +} + +static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + struct pwm_state *state) +{ + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); + struct pwm_state cur_state; + unsigned int duty_cycle; + unsigned long long num; + bool enabled; + int ret = 0; + u32 frac; + + if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) + return -EINVAL; + + ret = clk_enable(ddata->clk); + if (ret) { + dev_err(ddata->chip.dev, "Enable clk failed\n"); + return ret; + } + + mutex_lock(&ddata->lock); + cur_state = pwm->state; + enabled = cur_state.enabled; + + duty_cycle = state->duty_cycle; + if (!state->enabled) + duty_cycle = 0; + + /* + * The problem of output producing mixed setting as mentioned at top, + * occurs here. To minimize the window for this problem, we are + * calculating the register values first and then writing them + * consecutively + */ + num = (u64)duty_cycle * (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH); + frac = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(num, state->period); + /* The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle */ + frac = min(frac, (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1); + + if (state->period != ddata->approx_period) { + if (ddata->user_count != 1) { + ret = -EBUSY; + goto exit; + } + ddata->approx_period = state->period; + pwm_sifive_update_clock(ddata, clk_get_rate(ddata->clk)); + } + + writel(frac, ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP0 + + pwm->hwpwm * PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP); + + if (state->enabled != enabled) + pwm_sifive_enable(chip, state->enabled); + +exit: + clk_disable(ddata->clk); + mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock); + return ret; +} + +static const struct pwm_ops pwm_sifive_ops = { + .request = pwm_sifive_request, + .free = pwm_sifive_free, + .get_state = pwm_sifive_get_state, + .apply = pwm_sifive_apply, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, +}; + +static int pwm_sifive_clock_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, + unsigned long event, void *data) +{ + struct clk_notifier_data *ndata = data; + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = + container_of(nb, struct pwm_sifive_ddata, notifier); + + if (event == POST_RATE_CHANGE) + pwm_sifive_update_clock(ddata, ndata->new_rate); + + return NOTIFY_OK; +} + +static int pwm_sifive_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata; + struct pwm_chip *chip; + struct resource *res; + int ret; + + ddata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ddata), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ddata) + return -ENOMEM; + + mutex_init(&ddata->lock); + chip = &ddata->chip; + chip->dev = dev; + chip->ops = &pwm_sifive_ops; + chip->of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags; + chip->of_pwm_n_cells = 3; + chip->base = -1; + chip->npwm = 4; + + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + ddata->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(ddata->regs)) { + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map IO resources\n"); + return PTR_ERR(ddata->regs); + } + + ddata->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(ddata->clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(ddata->clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "Unable to find controller clock\n"); + return PTR_ERR(ddata->clk); + } + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(ddata->clk); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable clock for pwm: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + /* Watch for changes to underlying clock frequency */ + ddata->notifier.notifier_call = pwm_sifive_clock_notifier; + ret = clk_notifier_register(ddata->clk, &ddata->notifier); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to register clock notifier: %d\n", ret); + goto disable_clk; + } + + ret = pwmchip_add(chip); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "cannot register PWM: %d\n", ret); + goto unregister_clk; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ddata); + dev_dbg(dev, "SiFive PWM chip registered %d PWMs\n", chip->npwm); + + return 0; + +unregister_clk: + clk_notifier_unregister(ddata->clk, &ddata->notifier); +disable_clk: + clk_disable_unprepare(ddata->clk); + + return ret; +} + +static int pwm_sifive_remove(struct platform_device *dev) +{ + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = platform_get_drvdata(dev); + bool is_enabled = false; + struct pwm_device *pwm; + int ret, ch; + + ret = pwmchip_remove(&ddata->chip); + clk_notifier_unregister(ddata->clk, &ddata->notifier); + + for (ch = 0; ch < ddata->chip.npwm; ch++) { + pwm = &ddata->chip.pwms[ch]; + if (pwm->state.enabled) { + is_enabled = true; + break; + } + } + if (is_enabled) + clk_disable(ddata->clk); + clk_disable_unprepare(ddata->clk); + return ret; +} + +static const struct of_device_id pwm_sifive_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "sifive,pwm0" }, + {}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pwm_sifive_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver pwm_sifive_driver = { + .probe = pwm_sifive_probe, + .remove = pwm_sifive_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "pwm-sifive", + .of_match_table = pwm_sifive_of_match, + }, +}; +module_platform_driver(pwm_sifive_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SiFive PWM driver"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");