Message ID | 20201119170419.18272-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add support for the PolarFire Soc system controller | expand |
On 2020/11/20 2:05, conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote: > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > This driver adds support for the single mailbox channel of the MSS > system controller on the Microchip PolarFire SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > --- > drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 12 ++ > drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 + > drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 310 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c > > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig > index 05b1009e2820..4881a519683a 100644 > --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig > @@ -153,6 +153,18 @@ config MAILBOX_TEST > Test client to help with testing new Controller driver > implementations. > > +config MPFS_MBOX > + tristate "MPFS Mailbox" > + depends on HAS_IOMEM Shouldn't this dependency be on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ? > + depends on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE > + help > + This driver adds support for the Polarfire SoC mailbox controller. > + > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here. the > + module will be called mailbox-mpfs. > + > + If unsure, say Y. > + > config QCOM_APCS_IPC > tristate "Qualcomm APCS IPC driver" > depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile > index 2e06e02b2e03..63f49b5bcc43 100644 > --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_PDC_MBOX) += bcm-pdc-mailbox.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_FLEXRM_MBOX) += bcm-flexrm-mailbox.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MPFS_MBOX) += mailbox-mpfs.o > + > obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_APCS_IPC) += qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX) += tegra-hsp.o > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..686ccd3317f9 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c > @@ -0,0 +1,296 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Microchip MPFS system controller/mailbox controller driver > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2020 Microchip Corporation. All rights reserved. > + * > + * Author: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > + * > + */ > + > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/err.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h> > +#include <soc/microchip/mpfs.h> > + > +#define SERVICES_CR_OFFSET 0x50u > +#define SERVICES_SR_OFFSET 0x54u > +#define MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET 0x800u > +#define MSS_SYS_SUCCESS 0u Is this really necessary ? > +#define MSS_SYS_BUSY 0xefu > +#define MSS_SYS_PARAM_ERR 0xffu -EBUSY ? -EINVAL ? > +#define MSS_SYS_MAILBOX_DATA_OFFSET 0u > + > +/***************SCBCTRL SERVICES_CR register*************************/ I personally prefer more sober comments :) May be drop the "*********************" ? > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_REQ (0u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_REQ_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_REQ) > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_BUSY (1u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_BUSY_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_BUSY) > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_ABORT (2u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_ABORT_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_ABORT) > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_NOTIFY (3u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_NOTIFY_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_NOTIFY) > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND (16u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND_MASK (0xffffu << SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND) If you use BIT(), then it would be better to use GENMASK() here. > + > +/***************SCBCTRL SERVICES_SR registers*************************/ > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_REQ (0u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_REQ_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_REQ) > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY (1u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY) > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_ABORT (2u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_ABORT_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_ABORT) > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_NOTIFY (3u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_NOTIFY_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_NOTIFY) > + > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_STATUS (16u) > +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_STATUS_MASK (0xffffu << SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_STATUS) GENMASK(). > + > +struct mpfs_mbox { > + struct mbox_controller controller; > + struct device *dev; > + int irq; > + void __iomem *mailbox_base; > + void __iomem *int_reg; > + struct mbox_chan *chan; > + u16 response_size; > + u16 response_offset; > +}; > + > +static int mpfs_mbox_busy(struct mpfs_mbox *mbox) Return bool ? > +{ > + u32 status; > + > + status = readl_relaxed(mbox->mailbox_base + SERVICES_SR_OFFSET); > + > + return status & SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY_MASK; > +} > + > +static struct mpfs_mbox *mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(struct mbox_chan *chan) > +{ > + if (!chan || !chan->con_priv) > + return NULL; Is this ever called with chan == NULL ? > + > + return (struct mpfs_mbox *)chan->con_priv; > +} > + > +static int mpfs_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data) > +{ > + u32 index; > + u32 *word_buf; > + u8 *byte_buf; > + u8 byte_off; > + u8 byte_index; > + u32 mailbox_val = 0u; > + u16 mb_offset; > + u16 mbox_options_select; > + u32 mbox_tx_trigger; > + > + struct mpfs_mss_msg *msg = data; > + > + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); Please remove the empty lines before the declarations. > + > + mb_offset = msg->mailbox_offset; > + mbox->response_size = msg->response_size; > + mbox->response_offset = msg->response_offset; > + > + mbox_options_select = ((mb_offset << 7u) | (msg->cmd_opcode & 0x7fu)); > + mbox_tx_trigger = (((mbox_options_select << SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND) & > + SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND_MASK) | > + SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_REQ_MASK | SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_NOTIFY_MASK); > + > + if (mpfs_mbox_busy(mbox)) > + return MSS_SYS_BUSY; You can probably move this before the previous hunk, no ? If you are going to do nothing, then let's detect it earlier. > + > + /* Code for MSS_SYS_PARAM_ERR is not implemented with this version of driver. */ > + > + writel_relaxed(0x0U, mbox->int_reg); > + > + if (msg->cmd_data_size > 0u) { 0u ? Seriously ? > + byte_buf = (u8 *)(msg->cmd_data); > + > + for (index = 0u; index < (msg->cmd_data_size / 4u); index++) { > + writel_relaxed(word_buf[index], > + mbox->mailbox_base + MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET + index); > + } > + > + if ((msg->cmd_data_size % 4u) > 0u) { > + byte_off = (((msg->cmd_data_size / 4u) * 4u)); There are in my opinion far too many "u"s... Many of them are not necessary and just make the code harder to read. > + byte_buf = (u8 *)(msg->cmd_data + byte_off); > + > + mailbox_val = readl_relaxed(mbox->mailbox_base + > + MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET + index); > + > + for (byte_index = 0u; > + byte_index < (msg->cmd_data_size % 4u); > + byte_index++) { s/byte_index/i and your line would become shorter and easier to read. > + mailbox_val &= ~(0xffu << (byte_index * 8u)); > + mailbox_val |= (byte_buf[byte_index] > + << (byte_index * 8u)); > + } > + > + writel_relaxed(mailbox_val, > + mbox->mailbox_base + MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET + index); > + } > + } > + > + writel_relaxed(mbox_tx_trigger, mbox->mailbox_base + SERVICES_CR_OFFSET); > + > + return MSS_SYS_SUCCESS; > +} > + > +static inline int mpfs_mbox_pending(struct mpfs_mbox *mbox) return bool ? > +{ > + u32 status; > + > + status = readl_relaxed(mbox->mailbox_base + SERVICES_SR_OFFSET); > + > + return !(status & SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY_MASK); > +} > + > +static void mpfs_mbox_rx_data(struct mbox_chan *chan) > +{ > + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); > + u32 *data; > + u32 index; > + u32 response_limit; > + > + data = devm_kzalloc(mbox->dev, sizeof(*data) * mbox->response_size, > + GFP_ATOMIC); check the result please. What if that fails ? That is a GFP_ATOMIC. It can fail... > + > + response_limit = (mbox->response_size) + (mbox->response_offset); > + if (mpfs_mbox_pending(mbox) && mbox->response_size > 0U) { > + for (index = (mbox->response_offset); index < response_limit; > + index++) { s/index/i > + data[index - (mbox->response_offset)] = > + readl_relaxed(mbox->mailbox_base + MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET + > + index * 0x4); > + } > + } > + > + mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)data); > + devm_kfree(mbox->dev, data); > +} > + > +static irqreturn_t mpfs_mbox_inbox_isr(int irq, void *data) > +{ > + struct mbox_chan *chan = (struct mbox_chan *)data; > + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); > + > + writel_relaxed(0x0U, mbox->int_reg); > + > + mpfs_mbox_rx_data(chan); > + > + mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0); > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > +} > + > +static int mpfs_mbox_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan) > +{ > + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (!mbox) > + return -EINVAL; > + ret = devm_request_irq(mbox->dev, mbox->irq, mpfs_mbox_inbox_isr, 0, > + "mpfs-mailbox", chan); > + if (unlikely(ret)) { I do not think the unlikely is needed here. This is not hot-path. > + dev_err(mbox->dev, "failed to register mailbox interrupt:%d\n", > + ret); > + return ret; you do not need this return. Or at least change the next return to 0. > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void mpfs_mbox_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan) > +{ > + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); > + > + devm_free_irq(mbox->dev, mbox->irq, chan); > +} > + > +static const struct mbox_chan_ops mpfs_mbox_ops = { > + .send_data = mpfs_mbox_send_data, > + .startup = mpfs_mbox_startup, > + .shutdown = mpfs_mbox_shutdown, > +}; > + > +static int mpfs_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox; > + struct resource *regs; > + struct mbox_chan *chans; > + int ret; > + > + mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mbox), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mbox) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + chans = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*chans), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!chans) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + mbox->mailbox_base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, ®s); > + if (IS_ERR(mbox->mailbox_base)) > + return PTR_ERR(mbox->mailbox_base); > + > + mbox->int_reg = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1, ®s); > + if (IS_ERR(mbox->int_reg)) > + return PTR_ERR(mbox->int_reg); > + > + mbox->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); No error check ? Or did you mean to use platform_get_irq_optional() ? > + > + mbox->dev = &pdev->dev; > + > + chans[0].con_priv = mbox; > + mbox->controller.dev = mbox->dev; > + mbox->controller.num_chans = 1; > + mbox->controller.chans = chans; > + mbox->controller.ops = &mpfs_mbox_ops; > + mbox->controller.txdone_irq = true; > + > + ret = devm_mbox_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &mbox->controller); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Registering MPFS mailbox controller failed\n"); > + return -1; return ret; > + } > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Registered MPFS mailbox controller driver\n"); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id mpfs_mbox_of_match[] = { > + { > + .compatible = "microchip,polarfire-soc-mailbox", > + }, > + {}, > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mpfs_mbox_of_match); > + > +static struct platform_driver mpfs_mbox_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "mpfs-mailbox", > + .of_match_table = mpfs_mbox_of_match, > + }, > + .probe = mpfs_mbox_probe, > +}; > +module_platform_driver(mpfs_mbox_driver); > + > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MPFS mailbox controller driver"); >
On 20/11/2020 00:05, Damien Le Moal wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On 2020/11/20 2:05, conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote: >> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> >> This driver adds support for the single mailbox channel of the MSS >> system controller on the Microchip PolarFire SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> --- >> drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 12 ++ >> drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 + >> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 310 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig >> index 05b1009e2820..4881a519683a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig >> @@ -153,6 +153,18 @@ config MAILBOX_TEST >> Test client to help with testing new Controller driver >> implementations. >> >> +config MPFS_MBOX >> + tristate "MPFS Mailbox" >> + depends on HAS_IOMEM > Shouldn't this dependency be on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ? Not entirely sure what you mean by this one. You want the HAS_IOMEM to be selected by SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ? > >> + depends on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE >> + help >> + This driver adds support for the Polarfire SoC mailbox controller. >> + >> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here. the >> + module will be called mailbox-mpfs. >> + >> + If unsure, say Y. >> + >> config QCOM_APCS_IPC >> tristate "Qualcomm APCS IPC driver" >> depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST >> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile >> index 2e06e02b2e03..63f49b5bcc43 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile >> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_PDC_MBOX) += bcm-pdc-mailbox.o >> >> obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_FLEXRM_MBOX) += bcm-flexrm-mailbox.o >> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_MPFS_MBOX) += mailbox-mpfs.o >> + >> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_APCS_IPC) += qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.o >> >> obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX) += tegra-hsp.o >> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..686ccd3317f9 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,296 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * Microchip MPFS system controller/mailbox controller driver >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Microchip Corporation. All rights reserved. >> + * >> + * Author: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> + * >> + */ >> + >> +#include <linux/io.h> >> +#include <linux/err.h> >> +#include <linux/init.h> >> +#include <linux/module.h> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h> >> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> >> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> >> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h> >> +#include <soc/microchip/mpfs.h> >> + >> +#define SERVICES_CR_OFFSET 0x50u >> +#define SERVICES_SR_OFFSET 0x54u >> +#define MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET 0x800u >> +#define MSS_SYS_SUCCESS 0u trimmed, will address the rest in V2 > -- > Damien Le Moal > Western Digital Research
On 2020/11/30 22:23, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote: > On 20/11/2020 00:05, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >> >> On 2020/11/20 2:05, conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote: >>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> >>> This driver adds support for the single mailbox channel of the MSS >>> system controller on the Microchip PolarFire SoC. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 12 ++ >>> drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 + >>> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 310 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig >>> index 05b1009e2820..4881a519683a 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig >>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig >>> @@ -153,6 +153,18 @@ config MAILBOX_TEST >>> Test client to help with testing new Controller driver >>> implementations. >>> >>> +config MPFS_MBOX >>> + tristate "MPFS Mailbox" >>> + depends on HAS_IOMEM >> Shouldn't this dependency be on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ? > Not entirely sure what you mean by this one. You want the HAS_IOMEM to be selected by SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ? Sorry, I was not clear. I was referring to MPFS_MBOX: shouldn't it be dependent on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ? E.g.: config MPFS_MBOX tristate "MPFS Mailbox" depends on HAS_IOMEM depends on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ... Since it will probably not make sense to compile the driver when the SoC support is not selected. No ? >> >>> + depends on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE >>> + help >>> + This driver adds support for the Polarfire SoC mailbox controller. >>> + >>> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here. the >>> + module will be called mailbox-mpfs. >>> + >>> + If unsure, say Y. >>> + >>> config QCOM_APCS_IPC >>> tristate "Qualcomm APCS IPC driver" >>> depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST >>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile >>> index 2e06e02b2e03..63f49b5bcc43 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile >>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile >>> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_PDC_MBOX) += bcm-pdc-mailbox.o >>> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_FLEXRM_MBOX) += bcm-flexrm-mailbox.o >>> >>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MPFS_MBOX) += mailbox-mpfs.o >>> + >>> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_APCS_IPC) += qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.o >>> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX) += tegra-hsp.o >>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..686ccd3317f9 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c >>> @@ -0,0 +1,296 @@ >>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>> +/* >>> + * Microchip MPFS system controller/mailbox controller driver >>> + * >>> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Microchip Corporation. All rights reserved. >>> + * >>> + * Author: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> + * >>> + */ >>> + >>> +#include <linux/io.h> >>> +#include <linux/err.h> >>> +#include <linux/init.h> >>> +#include <linux/module.h> >>> +#include <linux/kernel.h> >>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> >>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> >>> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h> >>> +#include <soc/microchip/mpfs.h> >>> + >>> +#define SERVICES_CR_OFFSET 0x50u >>> +#define SERVICES_SR_OFFSET 0x54u >>> +#define MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET 0x800u >>> +#define MSS_SYS_SUCCESS 0u > trimmed, will address the rest in V2 >> -- >> Damien Le Moal >> Western Digital Research > > > >
On 30/11/2020 21:50, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 2020/11/30 22:23, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote: >> On 20/11/2020 00:05, Damien Le Moal wrote: >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >>> >>> On 2020/11/20 2:05, conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote: >>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>>> >>>> This driver adds support for the single mailbox channel of the MSS >>>> system controller on the Microchip PolarFire SoC. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 12 ++ >>>> drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 + >>>> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 3 files changed, 310 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig >>>> index 05b1009e2820..4881a519683a 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig >>>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig >>>> @@ -153,6 +153,18 @@ config MAILBOX_TEST >>>> Test client to help with testing new Controller driver >>>> implementations. >>>> >>>> +config MPFS_MBOX >>>> + tristate "MPFS Mailbox" >>>> + depends on HAS_IOMEM >>> Shouldn't this dependency be on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ? >> Not entirely sure what you mean by this one. You want the HAS_IOMEM to be selected by SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ? > > Sorry, I was not clear. I was referring to MPFS_MBOX: shouldn't it be dependent > on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE ? E.g.: > > config MPFS_MBOX > tristate "MPFS Mailbox" > depends on HAS_IOMEM > depends on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE > ... probably depends on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE || COMPILE_TEST so that you can build a "compile test" kernel with as much enabled as possible
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig index 05b1009e2820..4881a519683a 100644 --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig @@ -153,6 +153,18 @@ config MAILBOX_TEST Test client to help with testing new Controller driver implementations. +config MPFS_MBOX + tristate "MPFS Mailbox" + depends on HAS_IOMEM + depends on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE + help + This driver adds support for the Polarfire SoC mailbox controller. + + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here. the + module will be called mailbox-mpfs. + + If unsure, say Y. + config QCOM_APCS_IPC tristate "Qualcomm APCS IPC driver" depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile index 2e06e02b2e03..63f49b5bcc43 100644 --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_PDC_MBOX) += bcm-pdc-mailbox.o obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_FLEXRM_MBOX) += bcm-flexrm-mailbox.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MPFS_MBOX) += mailbox-mpfs.o + obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_APCS_IPC) += qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX) += tegra-hsp.o diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..686ccd3317f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c @@ -0,0 +1,296 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Microchip MPFS system controller/mailbox controller driver + * + * Copyright (c) 2020 Microchip Corporation. All rights reserved. + * + * Author: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> + * + */ + +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h> +#include <soc/microchip/mpfs.h> + +#define SERVICES_CR_OFFSET 0x50u +#define SERVICES_SR_OFFSET 0x54u +#define MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET 0x800u +#define MSS_SYS_SUCCESS 0u +#define MSS_SYS_BUSY 0xefu +#define MSS_SYS_PARAM_ERR 0xffu +#define MSS_SYS_MAILBOX_DATA_OFFSET 0u + +/***************SCBCTRL SERVICES_CR register*************************/ + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_REQ (0u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_REQ_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_REQ) + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_BUSY (1u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_BUSY_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_BUSY) + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_ABORT (2u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_ABORT_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_ABORT) + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_NOTIFY (3u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_NOTIFY_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_NOTIFY) + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND (16u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND_MASK (0xffffu << SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND) + +/***************SCBCTRL SERVICES_SR registers*************************/ + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_REQ (0u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_REQ_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_REQ) + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY (1u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY) + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_ABORT (2u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_ABORT_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_ABORT) + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_NOTIFY (3u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_NOTIFY_MASK BIT(SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_NOTIFY) + +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_STATUS (16u) +#define SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_STATUS_MASK (0xffffu << SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_STATUS) + +struct mpfs_mbox { + struct mbox_controller controller; + struct device *dev; + int irq; + void __iomem *mailbox_base; + void __iomem *int_reg; + struct mbox_chan *chan; + u16 response_size; + u16 response_offset; +}; + +static int mpfs_mbox_busy(struct mpfs_mbox *mbox) +{ + u32 status; + + status = readl_relaxed(mbox->mailbox_base + SERVICES_SR_OFFSET); + + return status & SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY_MASK; +} + +static struct mpfs_mbox *mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(struct mbox_chan *chan) +{ + if (!chan || !chan->con_priv) + return NULL; + + return (struct mpfs_mbox *)chan->con_priv; +} + +static int mpfs_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data) +{ + u32 index; + u32 *word_buf; + u8 *byte_buf; + u8 byte_off; + u8 byte_index; + u32 mailbox_val = 0u; + u16 mb_offset; + u16 mbox_options_select; + u32 mbox_tx_trigger; + + struct mpfs_mss_msg *msg = data; + + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); + + mb_offset = msg->mailbox_offset; + mbox->response_size = msg->response_size; + mbox->response_offset = msg->response_offset; + + mbox_options_select = ((mb_offset << 7u) | (msg->cmd_opcode & 0x7fu)); + mbox_tx_trigger = (((mbox_options_select << SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND) & + SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_COMMAND_MASK) | + SCBCTRL_SERVICESCR_REQ_MASK | SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_NOTIFY_MASK); + + if (mpfs_mbox_busy(mbox)) + return MSS_SYS_BUSY; + + /* Code for MSS_SYS_PARAM_ERR is not implemented with this version of driver. */ + + writel_relaxed(0x0U, mbox->int_reg); + + if (msg->cmd_data_size > 0u) { + byte_buf = (u8 *)(msg->cmd_data); + + for (index = 0u; index < (msg->cmd_data_size / 4u); index++) { + writel_relaxed(word_buf[index], + mbox->mailbox_base + MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET + index); + } + + if ((msg->cmd_data_size % 4u) > 0u) { + byte_off = (((msg->cmd_data_size / 4u) * 4u)); + byte_buf = (u8 *)(msg->cmd_data + byte_off); + + mailbox_val = readl_relaxed(mbox->mailbox_base + + MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET + index); + + for (byte_index = 0u; + byte_index < (msg->cmd_data_size % 4u); + byte_index++) { + mailbox_val &= ~(0xffu << (byte_index * 8u)); + mailbox_val |= (byte_buf[byte_index] + << (byte_index * 8u)); + } + + writel_relaxed(mailbox_val, + mbox->mailbox_base + MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET + index); + } + } + + writel_relaxed(mbox_tx_trigger, mbox->mailbox_base + SERVICES_CR_OFFSET); + + return MSS_SYS_SUCCESS; +} + +static inline int mpfs_mbox_pending(struct mpfs_mbox *mbox) +{ + u32 status; + + status = readl_relaxed(mbox->mailbox_base + SERVICES_SR_OFFSET); + + return !(status & SCBCTRL_SERVICESSR_BUSY_MASK); +} + +static void mpfs_mbox_rx_data(struct mbox_chan *chan) +{ + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); + u32 *data; + u32 index; + u32 response_limit; + + data = devm_kzalloc(mbox->dev, sizeof(*data) * mbox->response_size, + GFP_ATOMIC); + + response_limit = (mbox->response_size) + (mbox->response_offset); + if (mpfs_mbox_pending(mbox) && mbox->response_size > 0U) { + for (index = (mbox->response_offset); index < response_limit; + index++) { + data[index - (mbox->response_offset)] = + readl_relaxed(mbox->mailbox_base + MAILBOX_REG_OFFSET + + index * 0x4); + } + } + + mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)data); + devm_kfree(mbox->dev, data); +} + +static irqreturn_t mpfs_mbox_inbox_isr(int irq, void *data) +{ + struct mbox_chan *chan = (struct mbox_chan *)data; + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); + + writel_relaxed(0x0U, mbox->int_reg); + + mpfs_mbox_rx_data(chan); + + mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0); + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + +static int mpfs_mbox_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan) +{ + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); + int ret = 0; + + if (!mbox) + return -EINVAL; + ret = devm_request_irq(mbox->dev, mbox->irq, mpfs_mbox_inbox_isr, 0, + "mpfs-mailbox", chan); + if (unlikely(ret)) { + dev_err(mbox->dev, "failed to register mailbox interrupt:%d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + return ret; +} + +static void mpfs_mbox_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan) +{ + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox = mbox_chan_to_mpfs_mbox(chan); + + devm_free_irq(mbox->dev, mbox->irq, chan); +} + +static const struct mbox_chan_ops mpfs_mbox_ops = { + .send_data = mpfs_mbox_send_data, + .startup = mpfs_mbox_startup, + .shutdown = mpfs_mbox_shutdown, +}; + +static int mpfs_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct mpfs_mbox *mbox; + struct resource *regs; + struct mbox_chan *chans; + int ret; + + mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mbox), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!mbox) + return -ENOMEM; + + chans = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*chans), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!chans) + return -ENOMEM; + + mbox->mailbox_base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, ®s); + if (IS_ERR(mbox->mailbox_base)) + return PTR_ERR(mbox->mailbox_base); + + mbox->int_reg = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1, ®s); + if (IS_ERR(mbox->int_reg)) + return PTR_ERR(mbox->int_reg); + + mbox->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + + mbox->dev = &pdev->dev; + + chans[0].con_priv = mbox; + mbox->controller.dev = mbox->dev; + mbox->controller.num_chans = 1; + mbox->controller.chans = chans; + mbox->controller.ops = &mpfs_mbox_ops; + mbox->controller.txdone_irq = true; + + ret = devm_mbox_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &mbox->controller); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Registering MPFS mailbox controller failed\n"); + return -1; + } + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Registered MPFS mailbox controller driver\n"); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id mpfs_mbox_of_match[] = { + { + .compatible = "microchip,polarfire-soc-mailbox", + }, + {}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mpfs_mbox_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver mpfs_mbox_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "mpfs-mailbox", + .of_match_table = mpfs_mbox_of_match, + }, + .probe = mpfs_mbox_probe, +}; +module_platform_driver(mpfs_mbox_driver); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MPFS mailbox controller driver");