| Message ID | 20220128105746.2459-1-changbin.du@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | kallsyms: ignore local block labels generated by compiler | expand |
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 06:57:46PM +0800, Changbin Du wrote: > The llvm compiler can generate lots of local block labels and they might > overlap with C defined symbols. So let's ignore such local labels. > > Before this change, dumpstack shows a local symbol for epc: > [ 0.040341][ T0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > [ 0.040376][ T0] epc : .LBB6_14+0x22/0x6a > [ 0.040452][ T0] ra : restore_all+0x12/0x6e > > After this change, the C defined symbol is shown which is expected: > [ 0.035795][ T0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > [ 0.036332][ T0] epc : trace_hardirqs_on+0x54/0x13c > [ 0.036567][ T0] ra : restore_all+0x12/0x6e > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> > --- > scripts/kallsyms.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/scripts/kallsyms.c b/scripts/kallsyms.c > index 54ad86d13784..5f4be9d72a32 100644 > --- a/scripts/kallsyms.c > +++ b/scripts/kallsyms.c > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static bool is_ignored_symbol(const char *name, char type) > /* Symbol names that begin with the following are ignored.*/ > static const char * const ignored_prefixes[] = { > "$", /* local symbols for ARM, MIPS, etc. */ > + ".LBB", /* local block labels generated by compiler */ I aslo found many symbols like '.Ltmpxxx', '.L__unnamed_xx'. So should we just ignore all symbols prefixed by '.L'? > ".LASANPC", /* s390 kasan local symbols */ > "__crc_", /* modversions */ > "__efistub_", /* arm64 EFI stub namespace */ > -- > 2.32.0 >
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 7:21 AM Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 06:57:46PM +0800, Changbin Du wrote: > > The llvm compiler can generate lots of local block labels and they might > > overlap with C defined symbols. So let's ignore such local labels. > > > > Before this change, dumpstack shows a local symbol for epc: > > [ 0.040341][ T0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > > [ 0.040376][ T0] epc : .LBB6_14+0x22/0x6a > > [ 0.040452][ T0] ra : restore_all+0x12/0x6e > > > > After this change, the C defined symbol is shown which is expected: > > [ 0.035795][ T0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > > [ 0.036332][ T0] epc : trace_hardirqs_on+0x54/0x13c > > [ 0.036567][ T0] ra : restore_all+0x12/0x6e > > > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> > > --- > > scripts/kallsyms.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/scripts/kallsyms.c b/scripts/kallsyms.c > > index 54ad86d13784..5f4be9d72a32 100644 > > --- a/scripts/kallsyms.c > > +++ b/scripts/kallsyms.c > > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static bool is_ignored_symbol(const char *name, char type) > > /* Symbol names that begin with the following are ignored.*/ > > static const char * const ignored_prefixes[] = { > > "$", /* local symbols for ARM, MIPS, etc. */ > > + ".LBB", /* local block labels generated by compiler */ > I aslo found many symbols like '.Ltmpxxx', '.L__unnamed_xx'. So should we just > ignore all symbols prefixed by '.L'? .L prefixes are "local labels" meaning they don't get an entry in the symbol table. The trade off is that there is no such convention between compiler generated local label naming conventions, vs hand written ones. If we omit all local labels, then it might be surprising that a handwritten local label disappeared from this list. I think though that we should omit all local labels, and if someone needs a label to appear in their dumpstack, then they should simply drop the .L prefix on their handwritten label. > > > ".LASANPC", /* s390 kasan local symbols */ > > "__crc_", /* modversions */ > > "__efistub_", /* arm64 EFI stub namespace */ > > -- > > 2.32.0 > > > > -- > Cheers, > Changbin Du
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:59:55AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 7:21 AM Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 06:57:46PM +0800, Changbin Du wrote: > > > The llvm compiler can generate lots of local block labels and they might > > > overlap with C defined symbols. So let's ignore such local labels. > > > > > > Before this change, dumpstack shows a local symbol for epc: > > > [ 0.040341][ T0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > > > [ 0.040376][ T0] epc : .LBB6_14+0x22/0x6a > > > [ 0.040452][ T0] ra : restore_all+0x12/0x6e > > > > > > After this change, the C defined symbol is shown which is expected: > > > [ 0.035795][ T0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > > > [ 0.036332][ T0] epc : trace_hardirqs_on+0x54/0x13c > > > [ 0.036567][ T0] ra : restore_all+0x12/0x6e > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > scripts/kallsyms.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/scripts/kallsyms.c b/scripts/kallsyms.c > > > index 54ad86d13784..5f4be9d72a32 100644 > > > --- a/scripts/kallsyms.c > > > +++ b/scripts/kallsyms.c > > > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static bool is_ignored_symbol(const char *name, char type) > > > /* Symbol names that begin with the following are ignored.*/ > > > static const char * const ignored_prefixes[] = { > > > "$", /* local symbols for ARM, MIPS, etc. */ > > > + ".LBB", /* local block labels generated by compiler */ > > I aslo found many symbols like '.Ltmpxxx', '.L__unnamed_xx'. So should we just > > ignore all symbols prefixed by '.L'? > > .L prefixes are "local labels" meaning they don't get an entry in the > symbol table. The trade off is that there is no such convention > between compiler generated local label naming conventions, vs hand > written ones. If we omit all local labels, then it might be > surprising that a handwritten local label disappeared from this list. > I think though that we should omit all local labels, and if someone > needs a label to appear in their dumpstack, then they should simply > drop the .L prefix on their handwritten label. > Agree. I checked vmlinux for riscv and x86, seeing no handwritten function labels prefixed by '.L'. (just some data definition symbols). It should be safte to simply ignore all these symbols. > > > > > ".LASANPC", /* s390 kasan local symbols */ > > > "__crc_", /* modversions */ > > > "__efistub_", /* arm64 EFI stub namespace */ > > > -- > > > 2.32.0 > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Changbin Du > > > > -- > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers
diff --git a/scripts/kallsyms.c b/scripts/kallsyms.c index 54ad86d13784..5f4be9d72a32 100644 --- a/scripts/kallsyms.c +++ b/scripts/kallsyms.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static bool is_ignored_symbol(const char *name, char type) /* Symbol names that begin with the following are ignored.*/ static const char * const ignored_prefixes[] = { "$", /* local symbols for ARM, MIPS, etc. */ + ".LBB", /* local block labels generated by compiler */ ".LASANPC", /* s390 kasan local symbols */ "__crc_", /* modversions */ "__efistub_", /* arm64 EFI stub namespace */
The llvm compiler can generate lots of local block labels and they might overlap with C defined symbols. So let's ignore such local labels. Before this change, dumpstack shows a local symbol for epc: [ 0.040341][ T0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) [ 0.040376][ T0] epc : .LBB6_14+0x22/0x6a [ 0.040452][ T0] ra : restore_all+0x12/0x6e After this change, the C defined symbol is shown which is expected: [ 0.035795][ T0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) [ 0.036332][ T0] epc : trace_hardirqs_on+0x54/0x13c [ 0.036567][ T0] ra : restore_all+0x12/0x6e Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> --- scripts/kallsyms.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)