@@ -294,7 +294,6 @@ void __init_or_module riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin,
unsigned int stage)
{
u32 cpu_req_feature = cpufeature_probe(stage);
- u32 cpu_apply_feature = 0;
struct alt_entry *alt;
u32 tmp;
@@ -308,10 +307,8 @@ void __init_or_module riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin,
}
tmp = (1U << alt->errata_id);
- if (cpu_req_feature & tmp) {
+ if (cpu_req_feature & tmp)
patch_text_nosync(alt->old_ptr, alt->alt_ptr, alt->alt_len);
- cpu_apply_feature |= tmp;
- }
}
}
#endif
The variable was tracking which feature patches got applied but that information was never actually used - and thus resulted in a warning as well. Drop the variable. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> --- arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)