From patchwork Mon Jul 4 10:15:52 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sudeep Holla X-Patchwork-Id: 12905018 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 640DDC43334 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 10:23:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=z7cBXQT6PwY6U8QLDIfQtKOsgP7h4MclK97WBCPWuZc=; b=1EleK3mJ6fiWGP YY8uw9++pZiiYZ8qQNBPcSoLRcGvq09xpMjbQ0QNDF7pqKuPdv3Cwz65/gm+StAmfRU72qeEgNa1I s7pcARW8kmrBF7Zhl0LJsDTDpR7vltIPHFQTCGeTEWbYbSbe/dCNm6hVTpRG+5UKnQDs7h8RwcnQ0 a1xXQ8gh1lPkZfhheSRTMD5mUCwJfQPVPIamSzDvxEZz39A85+YSWhFFJFYv8gRZhtsZQ1APG9kjS 83mjSMGFTWpmLIxYMFkjy9YO0rgT+3sOlfRuaglveRI0m5ey/YoU6hrrIw4btH7M7eaTw+TmsHplo dIfXT0UIAC+xuePVjijQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o8JEr-006wtf-NH; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 10:23:33 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o8J84-006rcg-Ku; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 10:16:34 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17571480; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 03:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E16A73F792; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 03:16:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Sudeep Holla , conor.dooley@microchip.com, valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com, Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Qing Wang , Rob Herring , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Ionela Voinescu , Pierre Gondois , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v6 08/21] cacheinfo: Align checks in cache_shared_cpu_map_{setup,remove} for readability Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:15:52 +0100 Message-Id: <20220704101605.1318280-9-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.0 In-Reply-To: <20220704101605.1318280-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <20220704101605.1318280-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220704_031632_761758_138C9EA8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The checks to skip the CPU itself or no cacheinfo case are implemented bit differently though the effect is exactly same. Just align the implementation in both cache_shared_cpu_map_{setup,remove} just for improved readability. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c index e331b399adeb..65d566ff24c4 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu) if (i == cpu || !sib_cpu_ci->info_list) continue;/* skip if itself or no cacheinfo */ + sib_leaf = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(i, index); if (cache_leaves_are_shared(this_leaf, sib_leaf)) { cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &sib_leaf->shared_cpu_map); @@ -301,14 +302,11 @@ static void cache_shared_cpu_map_remove(unsigned int cpu) for (index = 0; index < cache_leaves(cpu); index++) { this_leaf = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu, index); for_each_cpu(sibling, &this_leaf->shared_cpu_map) { - struct cpu_cacheinfo *sib_cpu_ci; - - if (sibling == cpu) /* skip itself */ - continue; + struct cpu_cacheinfo *sib_cpu_ci = + get_cpu_cacheinfo(sibling); - sib_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(sibling); - if (!sib_cpu_ci->info_list) - continue; + if (sibling == cpu || !sib_cpu_ci->info_list) + continue;/* skip if itself or no cacheinfo */ sib_leaf = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(sibling, index); cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &sib_leaf->shared_cpu_map);