From patchwork Wed Jul 20 12:55:38 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sudeep Holla X-Patchwork-Id: 12923926 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 305ADC433EF for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:56:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Up05Q6vm38WH4QckFJYUwHC+HnFW1L06+NgsDXcWVl0=; b=f7Py4Bdglw2U/J EWm+phajwtxi7NmwhIvk1O1Zt+Mjiv5JEiyTBS1lWmuCjQ5KK33I++XQIG49TmzPQlt/gtxz++iZ0 MRDZ1oEmgkgbqdS2tqbKvsCTZ6QIBNBE1yQbfCUTokSihtMVGGmstZMcSnF+nqcBA7s+xDgjpIjTo 5v5t8KHXvfvVtPh6eRssAW7Qoo3/mBqG3Kw09JVnGgT81Pt08kDrInFZVVznWRu7IdWVbcFEiBxK7 Hdi+IOpF0g4qYIIvVIFipaggDKofOLW1EvrH4S47i965cv6tibEQsPXARAWS/BgIV24y29ZmrkDT5 ZDWca1Fwu1UQ8QBK3iug==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oE9Fo-005bu4-GZ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:56:40 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oE9FG-005b9q-7t; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:56:08 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BD915A1; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 05:56:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C81EA3F70D; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 05:56:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Dietmar Eggemann , Pierre Gondois , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Guenter Roeck , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Ionela Voinescu Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] cacheinfo: Use atomic allocation for percpu cache attributes Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:55:38 +0100 Message-Id: <20220720-arch_topo_fixes-v3-1-43d696288e84@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.1 In-Reply-To: <20220720-arch_topo_fixes-v3-0-43d696288e84@arm.com> References: <20220720-arch_topo_fixes-v3-0-43d696288e84@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220720_055606_385290_D251FF19 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.19 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On couple of architectures like RISC-V and ARM64, we need to detect cache attribues quite early during the boot when the secondary CPUs start. So we will call detect_cache_attributes in the atomic context and since use of normal allocation can sleep, we will end up getting "sleeping in the atomic context" bug splat. In order avoid that, move the allocation to use atomic version in preparation to move the actual detection of cache attributes in the CPU hotplug path which is atomic. Cc: Ionela Voinescu Tested-by: Conor Dooley Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c index 65d566ff24c4..4b5cd08c5a65 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ int detect_cache_attributes(unsigned int cpu) return -ENOENT; per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) = kcalloc(cache_leaves(cpu), - sizeof(struct cacheinfo), GFP_KERNEL); + sizeof(struct cacheinfo), GFP_ATOMIC); if (per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) == NULL) { cache_leaves(cpu) = 0; return -ENOMEM;