@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return lapic_in_kernel(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.apic->apicv_active;
}
-static inline bool kvm_apic_has_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static inline bool kvm_apic_has_pending_init_or_sipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return lapic_in_kernel(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events;
}
@@ -11920,8 +11920,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
struct fpstate *fpstate = vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate;
/*
- * To avoid have the INIT path from kvm_apic_has_events() that be
- * called with loaded FPU and does not let userspace fix the state.
+ * All paths that lead to INIT are required to load the guest's
+ * FPU state (because most paths are buried in KVM_RUN).
*/
if (init_event)
kvm_put_guest_fpu(vcpu);
@@ -12765,7 +12765,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done))
return true;
- if (kvm_apic_has_events(vcpu))
+ if (kvm_apic_has_pending_init_or_sipi(vcpu))
return true;
if (vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted)
Rename kvm_apic_has_events() to kvm_apic_has_pending_init_or_sipi() so that it's more obvious that "events" really just means "INIT or SIPI". Opportunistically clean up a weirdly worded comment that referenced kvm_apic_has_events() instead of kvm_apic_accept_events(). No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)