Message ID | 20221220120236.219804-2-ruinland.tsai@sifive.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | About adding new Z extensions in ISA realization | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/patch_count | success | Link |
conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next |
conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/alphanumeric_selects | success | Out of order selects before the patch: 57 and now 57 |
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/build_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
conchuod/checkpatch | fail | ERROR: trailing whitespace WARNING: please write a help paragraph that fully describes the config symbol |
conchuod/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 12:02:36PM +0000, Ruinland Tsai wrote: > arch/riscv : Add support for Zba/Zbb/Zbc/Zbs ext in ISA realization s|arch/riscv :|riscv: > This commit adds the ratified RISC-V Bitmanip 1.0.0 extensions "add the ..." > into the hadrware capability realization procedure. hardware > > Thus, the print out of Zba/Zbb/Zbc/Zbs of /proc/cpuinfo could be > matching the information provided in DT. "Thus, the printout of ... from /proc/cpuinfo could match the information..." > > Signed-off-by: Ruinland Tsai <ruinland.tsai@sifive.com> > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/riscv/Makefile | 6 ++++++ > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 4 ++++ > arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 4 ++++ > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 4 ++++ > 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index e2b656043abf..4f64d02d5208 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -447,6 +447,30 @@ config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZIHINTPAUSE > depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zihintpause) > depends on LLD_VERSION >= 150000 || LD_VERSION >= 23600 > > +config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBA > + bool "Zba extension support for B extension on Address generation" > + default y > + depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zba) > + depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zba) Surely all of these things need to check for linker support too, not just cc? Consider a setup where CC is rather new, but the linker is quite old. Does this not cause problems for Zb* as it did for ZIHINTPAUSE? > +config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB > + bool "Zbb extension support for B extension on Basic bit-manipulation" > + default y > + depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zbb) > + depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zbb) > + > +config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBC > + bool "Zbc extension support for B extension on Carry-less multiplication" > + default y > + depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zbc) > + depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zbc) > + > +config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBS > + bool "Zbs extension support for B extension on single-bit instruction" > + default y > + depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zbs) > + depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zbs) > + > config FPU > bool "FPU support" > default y > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile > index faf2c2177094..635fc2642a5e 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile > +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile > @@ -61,6 +61,12 @@ riscv-march-$(toolchain-need-zicsr-zifencei) := $(riscv-march-y)_zicsr_zifencei > # Check if the toolchain supports Zicbom extension > riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZICBOM) := $(riscv-march-y)_zicbom > > +# Check if the toolchain supports ratified B extensions > +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBA) := $(riscv-march-y)_zba > +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB) := $(riscv-march-y)_zbb > +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBC) := $(riscv-march-y)_zbc > +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBS) := $(riscv-march-y)_zbs > + > # Check if the toolchain supports Zihintpause extension > riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZIHINTPAUSE) := $(riscv-march-y)_zihintpause > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > index 86328e3acb02..baa51a282a69 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h > @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ extern unsigned long elf_hwcap; > enum riscv_isa_ext_id { > RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF = RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE, > RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT, > + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA, > + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, > + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC, > + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS, > RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, > RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE, > RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC, > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c > index 1b9a5a66e55a..70361105a612 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c > @@ -166,6 +166,10 @@ static struct riscv_isa_ext_data isa_ext_arr[] = { > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sstc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC), > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL), > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC), > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS), > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM), > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihintpause, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE), > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA("", RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX), Exactly how uABI-y this array is may be up for debate so I'd rather not add a whole load of items in in what may be an "incorrect" order. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221205144525.2148448-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com/ I'll make sure to go ping that one once the merge window closes so that we have a definitive order in which things must be added. Thanks, Conor. > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > index 93e45560af30..ee536e08d197 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > @@ -224,6 +224,10 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void) > } else { > SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("sscofpmf", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF); > SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("svpbmt", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT); > + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zba", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA); > + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbb", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB); > + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbc", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC); > + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbs", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS); > SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zicbom", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM); > SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zihintpause", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE); > SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("sstc", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC); > -- > 2.34.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv >
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index e2b656043abf..4f64d02d5208 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -447,6 +447,30 @@ config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZIHINTPAUSE depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zihintpause) depends on LLD_VERSION >= 150000 || LD_VERSION >= 23600 +config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBA + bool "Zba extension support for B extension on Address generation" + default y + depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zba) + depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zba) + +config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB + bool "Zbb extension support for B extension on Basic bit-manipulation" + default y + depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zbb) + depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zbb) + +config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBC + bool "Zbc extension support for B extension on Carry-less multiplication" + default y + depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zbc) + depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zbc) + +config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBS + bool "Zbs extension support for B extension on single-bit instruction" + default y + depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zbs) + depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zbs) + config FPU bool "FPU support" default y diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile index faf2c2177094..635fc2642a5e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile @@ -61,6 +61,12 @@ riscv-march-$(toolchain-need-zicsr-zifencei) := $(riscv-march-y)_zicsr_zifencei # Check if the toolchain supports Zicbom extension riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZICBOM) := $(riscv-march-y)_zicbom +# Check if the toolchain supports ratified B extensions +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBA) := $(riscv-march-y)_zba +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB) := $(riscv-march-y)_zbb +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBC) := $(riscv-march-y)_zbc +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBS) := $(riscv-march-y)_zbs + # Check if the toolchain supports Zihintpause extension riscv-march-$(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZIHINTPAUSE) := $(riscv-march-y)_zihintpause diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h index 86328e3acb02..baa51a282a69 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ extern unsigned long elf_hwcap; enum riscv_isa_ext_id { RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF = RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT, + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA, + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC, + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC, diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c index 1b9a5a66e55a..70361105a612 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c @@ -166,6 +166,10 @@ static struct riscv_isa_ext_data isa_ext_arr[] = { __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sstc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihintpause, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA("", RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX), diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c index 93e45560af30..ee536e08d197 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -224,6 +224,10 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void) } else { SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("sscofpmf", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF); SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("svpbmt", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT); + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zba", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA); + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbb", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB); + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbc", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC); + SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbs", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS); SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zicbom", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM); SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zihintpause", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE); SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("sstc", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC);
This commit adds the ratified RISC-V Bitmanip 1.0.0 extensions into the hadrware capability realization procedure. Thus, the print out of Zba/Zbb/Zbc/Zbs of /proc/cpuinfo could be matching the information provided in DT. Signed-off-by: Ruinland Tsai <ruinland.tsai@sifive.com> --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/Makefile | 6 ++++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 4 ++++ arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 4 ++++ arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 4 ++++ 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+)