| Message ID | 20221222114635.1251934-3-andrzej.hajda@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| conchuod/tree_selection | fail | Failed to apply to next/pending-fixes or riscv/for-next |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022, at 12:46, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > __xchg will be used for non-atomic xchg macro. > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> > --- > arch/arc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 4 ++-- Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> for all the arch/*/include/asm/cmpxchg.h changes. Since these patches are all the same, and they have identical subject and description texts, I would suggest combining them into a single patch to keep the series more compact. Having them separate would allow merging the patches through the individual architecture maintainer trees, but that in turn would mean waiting longer to get it all merged, but in this case it seems way easier to go through the asm-generic tree. Arnd
diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h index c5b544a5fe8106..e138fde067dea5 100644 --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ */ #ifdef CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC -#define __xchg(ptr, val) \ +#define __arch_xchg(ptr, val) \ ({ \ __asm__ __volatile__( \ " ex %0, [%1] \n" /* set new value */ \ @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ \ switch(sizeof(*(_p_))) { \ case 4: \ - _val_ = __xchg(_p_, _val_); \ + _val_ = __arch_xchg(_p_, _val_); \ break; \ default: \ BUILD_BUG(); \
__xchg will be used for non-atomic xchg macro. Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> --- arch/arc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)