Message ID | 20230109165249.110279-4-jiajie.ho@starfivetech.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Conor Dooley |
Headers | show |
Series | hwrng: starfive: Add driver for TRNG module | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/tree_selection | fail | Failed to apply to next/pending-fixes or riscv/for-next |
Hey folks, On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:52:49AM +0800, Jia Jie Ho wrote: > Adding StarFive TRNG controller node to VisionFive 2 SoC. > > Co-developed-by: Jenny Zhang <jenny.zhang@starfivetech.com> > Signed-off-by: Jenny Zhang <jenny.zhang@starfivetech.com> > Signed-off-by: Jia Jie Ho <jiajie.ho@starfivetech.com> > --- > arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi > index 4ac159d79d66..3c29e0bc6246 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi > @@ -455,5 +455,15 @@ uart5: serial@12020000 { > reg-shift = <2>; > status = "disabled"; > }; > + > + rng: rng@1600c000 { > + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-trng"; > + reg = <0x0 0x1600C000 0x0 0x4000>; > + clocks = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_HCLK>, > + <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_MISCAHB>; Which clock source is this? I see syscrg and aoncrg in the v3 devicetree: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220011247.35560-7-hal.feng@starfivetech.com/ Have a missed a patchset which adds support for this particular clock controller? At the very least, I don't think one has reached the linux-riscv mailing list. The clock driver patchset only has aoncrg & syscrg: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220005054.34518-1-hal.feng@starfivetech.com/ > + clock-names = "hclk", "ahb"; > + resets = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGRST_SEC_TOP_HRESETN>; > + interrupts = <30>; > + }; > }; > }; Thanks, Conor.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> > Sent: 10 January, 2023 2:02 AM > To: JiaJie Ho <jiajie.ho@starfivetech.com> > Cc: Olivia Mackall <olivia@selenic.com>; Herbert Xu > <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; Emil Renner > Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>; Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>; > linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: Add TRNG node for VisionFive > 2 > > Hey folks, > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:52:49AM +0800, Jia Jie Ho wrote: > > Adding StarFive TRNG controller node to VisionFive 2 SoC. > > > > Co-developed-by: Jenny Zhang <jenny.zhang@starfivetech.com> > > Signed-off-by: Jenny Zhang <jenny.zhang@starfivetech.com> > > Signed-off-by: Jia Jie Ho <jiajie.ho@starfivetech.com> > > --- > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi > > b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi > > index 4ac159d79d66..3c29e0bc6246 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi > > @@ -455,5 +455,15 @@ uart5: serial@12020000 { > > reg-shift = <2>; > > status = "disabled"; > > }; > > + > > + rng: rng@1600c000 { > > + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-trng"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x1600C000 0x0 0x4000>; > > + clocks = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_HCLK>, > > + <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_MISCAHB>; > > Which clock source is this? I see syscrg and aoncrg in the v3 > devicetree: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220011247.35560-7- > hal.feng@starfivetech.com/ > > Have a missed a patchset which adds support for this particular clock > controller? At the very least, I don't think one has reached the linux-riscv > mailing list. > The clock driver patchset only has aoncrg & syscrg: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220005054.34518-1- > hal.feng@starfivetech.com/ > Hi Conor, Thanks for reviewing the patches. Yes, the patch for stg domain hasn't been submitted yet. In this case should I drop this patch from the series until the related patches reach the mailing list? Thanks ,Jia Jie
On 10 January 2023 00:59:58 GMT, JiaJie Ho <jiajie.ho@starfivetech.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> >> Sent: 10 January, 2023 2:02 AM >> To: JiaJie Ho <jiajie.ho@starfivetech.com> >> Cc: Olivia Mackall <olivia@selenic.com>; Herbert Xu >> <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; >> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; Emil Renner >> Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>; Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>; >> linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: Add TRNG node for VisionFive >> 2 >> >> Hey folks, >> >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:52:49AM +0800, Jia Jie Ho wrote: >> > Adding StarFive TRNG controller node to VisionFive 2 SoC. >> > >> > Co-developed-by: Jenny Zhang <jenny.zhang@starfivetech.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Jenny Zhang <jenny.zhang@starfivetech.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Jia Jie Ho <jiajie.ho@starfivetech.com> >> > --- >> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ >> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi >> > b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi >> > index 4ac159d79d66..3c29e0bc6246 100644 >> > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi >> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi >> > @@ -455,5 +455,15 @@ uart5: serial@12020000 { >> > reg-shift = <2>; >> > status = "disabled"; >> > }; >> > + >> > + rng: rng@1600c000 { >> > + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-trng"; >> > + reg = <0x0 0x1600C000 0x0 0x4000>; >> > + clocks = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_HCLK>, >> > + <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_MISCAHB>; >> >> Which clock source is this? I see syscrg and aoncrg in the v3 >> devicetree: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220011247.35560-7- >> hal.feng@starfivetech.com/ >> >> Have a missed a patchset which adds support for this particular clock >> controller? At the very least, I don't think one has reached the linux-riscv >> mailing list. >> The clock driver patchset only has aoncrg & syscrg: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220005054.34518-1- >> hal.feng@starfivetech.com/ >> > >Hi Conor, > >Thanks for reviewing the patches. >Yes, the patch for stg domain hasn't been submitted yet. >In this case should I drop this patch from the series until the related patches reach the mailing list? Since it doesn't apply anyway, no harm keeping it IMO. Having the dts can make it easier, although not in this case, to look at the binding and driver. Just mention it in the cover letter if/when you send another version. Thanks, Conor.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> > Sent: 10 January, 2023 3:37 PM > To: JiaJie Ho <jiajie.ho@starfivetech.com> > Cc: Olivia Mackall <olivia@selenic.com>; Herbert Xu > <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; Emil Renner > Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>; Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>; > linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: Add TRNG node for VisionFive > 2 > > >> Which clock source is this? I see syscrg and aoncrg in the v3 > >> devicetree: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220011247.35560-7- > >> hal.feng@starfivetech.com/ > >> > >> Have a missed a patchset which adds support for this particular clock > >> controller? At the very least, I don't think one has reached the > >> linux-riscv mailing list. > >> The clock driver patchset only has aoncrg & syscrg: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221220005054.34518-1- > >> hal.feng@starfivetech.com/ > >> > > > >Hi Conor, > > > >Thanks for reviewing the patches. > >Yes, the patch for stg domain hasn't been submitted yet. > >In this case should I drop this patch from the series until the related patches > reach the mailing list? > > Since it doesn't apply anyway, no harm keeping it IMO. > Having the dts can make it easier, although not in this case, to look at the > binding and driver. > Just mention it in the cover letter if/when you send another version. > Sure, I'll do this. Thanks, Jia Jie
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi index 4ac159d79d66..3c29e0bc6246 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi @@ -455,5 +455,15 @@ uart5: serial@12020000 { reg-shift = <2>; status = "disabled"; }; + + rng: rng@1600c000 { + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-trng"; + reg = <0x0 0x1600C000 0x0 0x4000>; + clocks = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_HCLK>, + <&stgcrg JH7110_STGCLK_SEC_MISCAHB>; + clock-names = "hclk", "ahb"; + resets = <&stgcrg JH7110_STGRST_SEC_TOP_HRESETN>; + interrupts = <30>; + }; }; };