| Message ID | 20230201231250.3806412-6-atishp@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | KVM perf support | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
| conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next |
| conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 13 and now 13 |
| conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/alphanumeric_selects | success | Out of order selects before the patch: 59 and now 59 |
| conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2 |
| conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked |
| conchuod/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:41PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote: > According to the SBI specification, the stop function can only > return error code SBI_ERR_FAILED. However, currently it returns > -EINVAL which will be mapped SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM. > > Return an linux error code that maps to SBI_ERR_FAILED i.e doesn't map > to any other SBI error code. While EACCES is not the best error code > to describe the situation, it is close enough and will be replaced > with SBI error codes directly anyways. > > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> > --- > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c > index 2e915ca..619ac0f 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > if (vcpu->arch.power_off) > - return -EINVAL; > + return -EACCES; > > kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(vcpu); > > -- > 2.25.1 > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c index 2e915ca..619ac0f 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) static int kvm_sbi_hsm_vcpu_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { if (vcpu->arch.power_off) - return -EINVAL; + return -EACCES; kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);