| Message ID | 20230727130049.2810959-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [-next] spi: microchip-core: Clean up redundant dev_err_probe() | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| conchuod/cover_letter | success | Single patches do not need cover letters |
| conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 471aba2e4760 |
| conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| conchuod/maintainers_pattern | success | MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 4 and now 4 |
| conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
| conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig | success | Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9 |
| conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3 |
| conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| conchuod/checkpatch | warning | WARNING: 'Refering' may be misspelled - perhaps 'Referring'? |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:00:49PM +0800, Chen Jiahao wrote: > Refering to platform_get_irq()'s definition, the return value has > already been checked if ret < 0, and printed via dev_err_probe(). > Calling dev_err_probe() one more time outside platform_get_irq() > is obviously redundant. > > Furthermore, platform_get_irq() will never return irq equals 0, > removing spi->irq == 0 checking to clean it up. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c > index b59e8a0c5b97..ac3b7b163db4 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c > @@ -530,10 +530,8 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(spi->regs); > > spi->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > - if (spi->irq <= 0) > - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENXIO, > - "invalid IRQ %d for SPI controller\n", > - spi->irq); > + if (spi->irq < 0) > + return -ENXIO; platform_get_irq() returns an ERRNO that can now be propagated since the special case for 0 no longer requires handling, no? > > ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, spi->irq, mchp_corespi_interrupt, > IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), master); > -- > 2.34.1 >
On 2023/7/27 21:34, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:00:49PM +0800, Chen Jiahao wrote: >> Refering to platform_get_irq()'s definition, the return value has >> already been checked if ret < 0, and printed via dev_err_probe(). >> Calling dev_err_probe() one more time outside platform_get_irq() >> is obviously redundant. >> >> Furthermore, platform_get_irq() will never return irq equals 0, >> removing spi->irq == 0 checking to clean it up. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c | 6 ++---- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c >> index b59e8a0c5b97..ac3b7b163db4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c >> @@ -530,10 +530,8 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return PTR_ERR(spi->regs); >> >> spi->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); >> - if (spi->irq <= 0) >> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENXIO, >> - "invalid IRQ %d for SPI controller\n", >> - spi->irq); >> + if (spi->irq < 0) >> + return -ENXIO; > platform_get_irq() returns an ERRNO that can now be propagated since > the special case for 0 no longer requires handling, no? Sure, you are right. Here we should directly return the ERRNO passed from platform_get_irq(), since platform_get_irq() has performed all error checking inside. Thanks for reminding. Jiahao > >> >> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, spi->irq, mchp_corespi_interrupt, >> IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), master); >> -- >> 2.34.1 >>
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c index b59e8a0c5b97..ac3b7b163db4 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c @@ -530,10 +530,8 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(spi->regs); spi->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); - if (spi->irq <= 0) - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENXIO, - "invalid IRQ %d for SPI controller\n", - spi->irq); + if (spi->irq < 0) + return -ENXIO; ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, spi->irq, mchp_corespi_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), master);
Refering to platform_get_irq()'s definition, the return value has already been checked if ret < 0, and printed via dev_err_probe(). Calling dev_err_probe() one more time outside platform_get_irq() is obviously redundant. Furthermore, platform_get_irq() will never return irq equals 0, removing spi->irq == 0 checking to clean it up. Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com> --- drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)