Message ID | 20230830164954.91987-11-ajones@ventanamicro.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | RISC-V: Enable cbo.zero in usermode | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/tree_selection | fail | Failed to apply to next/pending-fixes, riscv/for-next or riscv/master |
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 06:49:58PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > Expose Zicboz through hwprobe and also provide a key to extract its > respective block size. Opportunistically add a macro and apply it to > current extensions in order to avoid duplicating code. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com> > --- > Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 6 ++++ > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +- > arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 ++ > arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++-------- > 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst > index 933c715065d6..6a17c2872660 100644 > --- a/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst > +++ b/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst > @@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ The following keys are defined: > * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS`: The Zbs extension is supported, as defined > in version 1.0 of the Bit-Manipulation ISA extensions. > > + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ`: The Zicboz extension is supported, as > + ratified in commit 3dd606f ("Create cmobase-v1.0.pdf") of riscv-CMOs. > + > * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0`: A bitmask that contains performance > information about the selected set of processors. > > @@ -97,3 +100,6 @@ The following keys are defined: > > * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned accesses are > not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault. > + > +* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which > + represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes. > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h > index 78936f4ff513..39df8604fea1 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h > @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ > > #include <uapi/asm/hwprobe.h> > > -#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 5 > +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 6 > > #endif > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h > index 006bfb48343d..86d08a0e617b 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe { > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA (1 << 3) > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB (1 << 4) > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS (1 << 5) > +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ (1 << 6) > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0 5 > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN (0 << 0) > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED (1 << 0) > @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe { > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST (3 << 0) > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED (4 << 0) > #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_MASK (7 << 0) > +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE 6 > /* Increase RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY when adding items. */ > > #endif > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c > index 26ef5526bfb4..d17cb5b4945b 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c > @@ -145,26 +145,38 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, > for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) { > struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu]; > > - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBA)) > - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; > - else > - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; > - > - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBB)) > - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; > - else > - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; > - > - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBS)) > - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; > - else > - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; > +#define EXT_KEY(ext) \ > + do { \ > + if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)) \ > + pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##ext; \ > + else \ > + missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##ext; \ > + } while (false) > + > + /* > + * Only use EXT_KEY() for extensions which can be exposed to userspace, > + * regardless of the kernel's configuration, as no other checks, besides > + * presence in the hart_isa bitmap, are made. Thanks for adding the comment. Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Thanks, Conor. > + */ > + EXT_KEY(ZBA); > + EXT_KEY(ZBB); > + EXT_KEY(ZBS); > + EXT_KEY(ZICBOZ); > +#undef EXT_KEY > } > > /* Now turn off reporting features if any CPU is missing it. */ > pair->value &= ~missing; > } > > +static bool hwprobe_ext0_has(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long ext) > +{ > + struct riscv_hwprobe pair; > + > + hwprobe_isa_ext0(&pair, cpus); > + return (pair.value & ext); > +} > + > static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) > { > int cpu; > @@ -215,6 +227,12 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, > pair->value = hwprobe_misaligned(cpus); > break; > > + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE: > + pair->value = 0; > + if (hwprobe_ext0_has(cpus, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ)) > + pair->value = riscv_cboz_block_size; > + break; > + > /* > * For forward compatibility, unknown keys don't fail the whole > * call, but get their element key set to -1 and value set to 0 > -- > 2.41.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst index 933c715065d6..6a17c2872660 100644 --- a/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst +++ b/Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst @@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ The following keys are defined: * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS`: The Zbs extension is supported, as defined in version 1.0 of the Bit-Manipulation ISA extensions. + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ`: The Zicboz extension is supported, as + ratified in commit 3dd606f ("Create cmobase-v1.0.pdf") of riscv-CMOs. + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0`: A bitmask that contains performance information about the selected set of processors. @@ -97,3 +100,6 @@ The following keys are defined: * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned accesses are not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault. + +* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which + represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes. diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h index 78936f4ff513..39df8604fea1 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ #include <uapi/asm/hwprobe.h> -#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 5 +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 6 #endif diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h index 006bfb48343d..86d08a0e617b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe { #define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA (1 << 3) #define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB (1 << 4) #define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS (1 << 5) +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ (1 << 6) #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0 5 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN (0 << 0) #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED (1 << 0) @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe { #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST (3 << 0) #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED (4 << 0) #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_MASK (7 << 0) +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE 6 /* Increase RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY when adding items. */ #endif diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c index 26ef5526bfb4..d17cb5b4945b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c @@ -145,26 +145,38 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) { struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu]; - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBA)) - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; - else - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA; - - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBB)) - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; - else - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB; - - if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBS)) - pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; - else - missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS; +#define EXT_KEY(ext) \ + do { \ + if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)) \ + pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##ext; \ + else \ + missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_##ext; \ + } while (false) + + /* + * Only use EXT_KEY() for extensions which can be exposed to userspace, + * regardless of the kernel's configuration, as no other checks, besides + * presence in the hart_isa bitmap, are made. + */ + EXT_KEY(ZBA); + EXT_KEY(ZBB); + EXT_KEY(ZBS); + EXT_KEY(ZICBOZ); +#undef EXT_KEY } /* Now turn off reporting features if any CPU is missing it. */ pair->value &= ~missing; } +static bool hwprobe_ext0_has(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long ext) +{ + struct riscv_hwprobe pair; + + hwprobe_isa_ext0(&pair, cpus); + return (pair.value & ext); +} + static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) { int cpu; @@ -215,6 +227,12 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, pair->value = hwprobe_misaligned(cpus); break; + case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE: + pair->value = 0; + if (hwprobe_ext0_has(cpus, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ)) + pair->value = riscv_cboz_block_size; + break; + /* * For forward compatibility, unknown keys don't fail the whole * call, but get their element key set to -1 and value set to 0