diff mbox series

[bpf-next,2/4] riscv, bpf: Using kvcalloc to allocate cache buffer

Message ID 20230919035711.3297256-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere, archived
Headers show
Series Mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls for RV64 | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
conchuod/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be for-next at HEAD 0bb80ecc33a8
conchuod/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
conchuod/maintainers_pattern success MAINTAINERS pattern errors before the patch: 5 and now 5
conchuod/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
conchuod/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
conchuod/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
conchuod/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
conchuod/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig success Build OK
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 success Errors and warnings before: 25 this patch: 25
conchuod/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
conchuod/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 32 lines checked
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig success Build OK
conchuod/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig success Build OK

Commit Message

Pu Lehui Sept. 19, 2023, 3:57 a.m. UTC 
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

It is unnecessary to allocate continuous physical memory for cache
buffer, and when ebpf program is too large, it may cause memory
allocation failure.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 4 ++--
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c   | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 8423f4ddf..57535cfe1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -906,7 +906,7 @@  static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	}
 
 	if (fmod_ret->nr_links) {
-		branches_off = kcalloc(fmod_ret->nr_links, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
+		branches_off = kvcalloc(fmod_ret->nr_links, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!branches_off)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@  static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 
 	ret = ctx->ninsns;
 out:
-	kfree(branches_off);
+	kvfree(branches_off);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
index dd00103a2..d9c82537d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@  struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	}
 
 	ctx->prog = prog;
-	ctx->offset = kcalloc(prog->len, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
+	ctx->offset = kvcalloc(prog->len, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ctx->offset) {
 		prog = orig_prog;
 		goto out_offset;
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@  struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
 		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
 out_offset:
-		kfree(ctx->offset);
+		kvfree(ctx->offset);
 		kfree(jit_data);
 		prog->aux->jit_data = NULL;
 	}