Message ID | 20240130040958.230673-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls for RV64 | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/vmtest-fixes-PR | fail | merge-conflict |
Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com> writes: > From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> > > There is no gain in initializing ctx->offset and prev_insns, and > ctx->offset is already zero-initialized. Let's remove this code. > > Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c index 7b70ccb7fec3..b271240f48c9 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c @@ -91,11 +91,6 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog) goto out_offset; } - for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) { - prev_ninsns += 32; - ctx->offset[i] = prev_ninsns; - } - for (i = 0; i < NR_JIT_ITERATIONS; i++) { pass++; ctx->ninsns = 0;