diff mbox series

[v2,7/7] x86: mm: accelerate pagefault when badaccess

Message ID 20240403083805.1818160-8-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere
Headers show
Series arch/mm/fault: accelerate pagefault when badaccess | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/vmtest-for-next-PR success PR summary
conchuod/patch-7-test-1 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv32_defconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-2 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-3 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-4 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-5 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-6 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/checkpatch.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-7 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/dtb_warn_rv64.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-8 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/header_inline.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-9 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/kdoc.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-10 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/module_param.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-11 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/verify_fixes.sh
conchuod/patch-7-test-12 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/verify_signedoff.sh

Commit Message

Kefeng Wang April 3, 2024, 8:38 a.m. UTC
The access_error() of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it
is a bad access, directly handle error, no need to retry with mmap_lock
again. In order to release the correct lock, pass the mm_struct into
bad_area_access_error(), if mm is NULL, release vma lock, or release
mmap_lock. Since the page faut is handled under per-VMA lock, count it
as a vma lock event with VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS.

Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index a4cc20d0036d..67b18adc75dd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -866,14 +866,17 @@  bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 
 static void
 __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
-	   unsigned long address, u32 pkey, int si_code)
+	   unsigned long address, struct mm_struct *mm,
+	   struct vm_area_struct *vma, u32 pkey, int si_code)
 {
-	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
 	/*
 	 * Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map..
 	 * Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first..
 	 */
-	mmap_read_unlock(mm);
+	if (mm)
+		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
+	else
+		vma_end_read(vma);
 
 	__bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, error_code, address, pkey, si_code);
 }
@@ -897,7 +900,8 @@  static inline bool bad_area_access_from_pkeys(unsigned long error_code,
 
 static noinline void
 bad_area_access_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
-		      unsigned long address, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+		      unsigned long address, struct mm_struct *mm,
+		      struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
 	/*
 	 * This OSPKE check is not strictly necessary at runtime.
@@ -927,9 +931,9 @@  bad_area_access_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		 */
 		u32 pkey = vma_pkey(vma);
 
-		__bad_area(regs, error_code, address, pkey, SEGV_PKUERR);
+		__bad_area(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma, pkey, SEGV_PKUERR);
 	} else {
-		__bad_area(regs, error_code, address, 0, SEGV_ACCERR);
+		__bad_area(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma, 0, SEGV_ACCERR);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1357,8 +1361,9 @@  void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
 		goto lock_mmap;
 
 	if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, vma))) {
-		vma_end_read(vma);
-		goto lock_mmap;
+		bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, NULL, vma);
+		count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS);
+		return;
 	}
 	fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags | FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK, regs);
 	if (!(fault & (VM_FAULT_RETRY | VM_FAULT_COMPLETED)))
@@ -1394,7 +1399,7 @@  void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
 	 * we can handle it..
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, vma))) {
-		bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, vma);
+		bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma);
 		return;
 	}