From patchwork Tue Apr 16 06:42:07 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xu Kuohai X-Patchwork-Id: 13631392 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D92C4345F for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:39:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=4kLbWz57D3U9ddahFe5ueHHUZHbTU+C/OlsDM9aC280=; b=j/mvrg3z7P7Y5Q 8bNx5T2FJxrNafQpK0vO825bwi8DBBzFi6RNReuC+rMbg+TpkW1uKTGEPLOuEIH6GOR7CQrW1MPQb Eb+lsbj+RUHJyD5iNz1x3Ul6qq1SywJuE68Wcwt4BpeqCZ296Av+4chfF0537ESsUU8/hMInUxevh MmN09LoveGwaKDoU0uHuibFoVW1W5Rv9ENcxPW/VeLC+oJMGwe7mrOkDw4eNBmqUStmp8D+0pm4SB Krit6jHrLlORm5nvMdcHhO/lQXs4Mdsfpg/zP1Qh2qHeEwwYiyAi17V+q2iPm84iAJOwX3HDGLHYV F32UN+uaZ67enMi8Kxbw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rwcTu-0000000B74h-2syM; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:39:50 +0000 Received: from [45.249.212.51] (helo=dggsgout11.his.huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rwcTc-0000000B6tb-3jSC; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:39:36 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VJZBd5ZDyz4f3nTV; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:39:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C051A0B18; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:39:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from k01.huawei.com (unknown [10.67.174.197]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgDnAQsRHR5mMjd4KA--.14140S3; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:39:14 +0800 (CST) From: Xu Kuohai To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: Ivan Babrou , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Pu Lehui Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, arm64: Fix incorrect runtime stats Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:42:07 +0800 Message-Id: <20240416064208.2919073-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20240416064208.2919073-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240416064208.2919073-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgDnAQsRHR5mMjd4KA--.14140S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7uFyfJw17CryfJF1xXr1fJFb_yoW8Gw4Upw 4UC3sIkay0gF4DXa4kX3W7Ary5CFsrGr13urWUG3ySy3Z09rW7GF1Fk390krWfurWIyF4r ZrWjyF1fCF4DCwUanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvGb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26ryj6rWUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v2 6rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr 0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY 17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcV C0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY 6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa 73UjIFyTuYvjxUzl1vUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 50xn30hkdlqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240415_233933_131431_61B4D203 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.23 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Xu Kuohai When __bpf_prog_enter() returns zero, the arm64 register x20 that stores prog start time is not assigned to zero, causing incorrect runtime stats. To fix it, assign the return value of bpf_prog_enter() to x20 register immediately upon its return. Fixes: efc9909fdce0 ("bpf, arm64: Add bpf trampoline for arm64") Reported-by: Ivan Babrou Tested-by: Ivan Babrou Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai --- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 76b91f36c729..cf9a9ebb4cda 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1905,15 +1905,15 @@ static void invoke_bpf_prog(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_link *l, emit_call(enter_prog, ctx); + /* save return value to callee saved register x20 */ + emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(20), A64_R(0)), ctx); + /* if (__bpf_prog_enter(prog) == 0) * goto skip_exec_of_prog; */ branch = ctx->image + ctx->idx; emit(A64_NOP, ctx); - /* save return value to callee saved register x20 */ - emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(20), A64_R(0)), ctx); - emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_R(0), A64_SP, args_off), ctx); if (!p->jited) emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(1), (const u64)p->insnsi, ctx);