From patchwork Sat May 18 09:29:15 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pu Lehui X-Patchwork-Id: 13667530 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3EA3C25B74 for ; Sat, 18 May 2024 09:28:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Hhxho8VG8rhzHm5m3Mg/W9ShTDSoxmmLxW0EDaKnsIA=; b=F/tCuSOm3AviBl p5vnBrnNuNuQmKHq9SbwJgQ0LXl0znwpqMAsIkhfql/MrIdYIffmNrN7PAVaE/pjiA0C7YA732269 MXcvhu2K/ZDElNBDuj/NOatYaDUMx21Z17VaZzqFTuOowdkK4kWnYrnQ3sMoM4fxTvXYfwYDOUVnO nc5IlvvPvQ7/ITau2ZE3cdZtG5n0opiQvbJIY36xvZsikK1pO/gojqUy/Wk693Fv3F7i/O/YJuIRq YHwTQuxXmVYz6RKBYCAkV8U2WfvVSXFPUk29aOguIq1JEmfsYgCMVh+k6GQr95g9GlkPAO8r1O4Pj Rz3bUx1SWPpBc7HI/lJA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s8GMn-00000009pn3-2YmD; Sat, 18 May 2024 09:28:37 +0000 Received: from [45.249.212.56] (helo=dggsgout12.his.huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s8GMg-00000009piJ-2VGX for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 18 May 2024 09:28:33 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VhJQs5mnGz4f3jcn for ; Sat, 18 May 2024 17:28:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.75]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0741A01D2 for ; Sat, 18 May 2024 17:28:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from ultra.huawei.com (unknown [10.90.53.71]) by APP2 (Coremail) with SMTP id Syh0CgBnwvWtdEhmbxE_NQ--.58131S3; Sat, 18 May 2024 17:28:14 +0800 (CST) From: Pu Lehui To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , =?utf-8?b?Qmo=?= =?utf-8?b?w7ZybiBUw7ZwZWw=?= , Pu Lehui , Puranjay Mohan , Palmer Dabbelt , Pu Lehui Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf: Use precise image size for struct_ops trampoline Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 09:29:15 +0000 Message-Id: <20240518092917.2771703-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240518092917.2771703-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240518092917.2771703-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: Syh0CgBnwvWtdEhmbxE_NQ--.58131S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWrKFy5CF4kXF17trW8CFy5XFb_yoW8Jry5pa ykGw1Y9w4UXr98CrWkXa1jvF1fu3WkX34UGFWUJrWrK34Yq34qgr1jgry5Z3yfKF4Fkrn8 AF1q9rZ0ya4UZ3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUDqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBYb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW5JVW7JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v2 6rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r106r15McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r4a6rW5MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26r4UJVWxJrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8niSPUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: psxovxtxl6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240518_022831_331823_80F41EE1 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.88 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Pu Lehui For trampoline using bpf_prog_pack, we need to generate a rw_image buffer with size of (image_end - image). For regular trampoline, we use the precise image size generated by arch_bpf_trampoline_size to allocate rw_image. But for struct_ops trampoline, we allocate rw_image directly using close to PAGE_SIZE size. We do not need to allocate for that much, as the patch size is usually much smaller than PAGE_SIZE. Let's use precise image size for it too. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui Acked-by: Song Liu Tested-by: Björn Töpel #riscv --- kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c index 86c7884abaf8..8aee184622af 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks, } size = arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(NULL, image + image_off, - image + PAGE_SIZE, + image + image_off + size, model, flags, tlinks, stub_func); if (size <= 0) { if (image != *_image)