diff mbox series

[v3,2/2] irqchip/riscv-aplic: add support for hart indexes

Message ID 20250107075835.1421602-3-vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series riscv,aplic: support for hart indexes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/vmtest-for-next-PR success PR summary
conchuod/patch-2-test-1 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv32_defconfig.sh took 108.28s
conchuod/patch-2-test-2 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig.sh took 1104.97s
conchuod/patch-2-test-3 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig.sh took 1298.67s
conchuod/patch-2-test-4 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig.sh took 16.83s
conchuod/patch-2-test-5 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig.sh took 18.56s
conchuod/patch-2-test-6 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/checkpatch.sh took 0.40s
conchuod/patch-2-test-7 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/dtb_warn_rv64.sh took 36.85s
conchuod/patch-2-test-8 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/header_inline.sh took 0.00s
conchuod/patch-2-test-9 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/kdoc.sh took 0.47s
conchuod/patch-2-test-10 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/module_param.sh took 0.01s
conchuod/patch-2-test-11 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/verify_fixes.sh took 0.00s
conchuod/patch-2-test-12 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/verify_signedoff.sh took 0.02s

Commit Message

Vladimir Kondratiev Jan. 7, 2025, 7:58 a.m. UTC
Risc-V APLIC specification defines "hart index" in [1]:

Within a given interrupt domain, each of the domain’s harts has a
unique index number in the range 0 to 2^14 − 1 (= 16,383). The index
number a domain associates with a hart may or may not have any
relationship to the unique hart identifier (“hart ID”) that the
RISC-V Privileged Architecture assigns to the hart. Two different
interrupt domains may employ entirely different index numbers for
the same set of harts.

Further, this document says in "4.5 Memory-mapped control
region for an interrupt domain":

The array of IDC structures may include some for potential hart index
numbers that are not actual hart index numbers in the domain. For
example, the first IDC structure is always for hart index 0, but 0 is
not necessarily a valid index number for any hart in the domain.

Support arbitrary hart indexes specified in optional APLIC property
"riscv,hart-indexes" that should be array of u32 elements, one per
interrupt target. If this property not specified, fallback is to use
logical hart indexes within the domain.

[1]: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-aia

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Anup Patel Jan. 8, 2025, 12:27 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 1:29 PM Vladimir Kondratiev
<vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com> wrote:
>
> Risc-V APLIC specification defines "hart index" in [1]:
>
> Within a given interrupt domain, each of the domain’s harts has a
> unique index number in the range 0 to 2^14 − 1 (= 16,383). The index
> number a domain associates with a hart may or may not have any
> relationship to the unique hart identifier (“hart ID”) that the
> RISC-V Privileged Architecture assigns to the hart. Two different
> interrupt domains may employ entirely different index numbers for
> the same set of harts.
>
> Further, this document says in "4.5 Memory-mapped control
> region for an interrupt domain":
>
> The array of IDC structures may include some for potential hart index
> numbers that are not actual hart index numbers in the domain. For
> example, the first IDC structure is always for hart index 0, but 0 is
> not necessarily a valid index number for any hart in the domain.
>
> Support arbitrary hart indexes specified in optional APLIC property
> "riscv,hart-indexes" that should be array of u32 elements, one per
> interrupt target. If this property not specified, fallback is to use
> logical hart indexes within the domain.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-aia
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com>

Please include the Reviewed-by tags obtained on previous patch revisions.

In any case, this still looks to me.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>

Regards,
Anup

> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
> index 7cd6b646774b..ea61329decb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct aplic_direct {
>  };
>
>  struct aplic_idc {
> -       unsigned int            hart_index;
> +       u32                     hart_index;
>         void __iomem            *regs;
>         struct aplic_direct     *direct;
>  };
> @@ -219,6 +219,21 @@ static int aplic_direct_parse_parent_hwirq(struct device *dev, u32 index,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int aplic_direct_get_hart_index(struct device *dev, u32 logical_index,
> +                                      u32 *hart_index)
> +{
> +       static const char *prop_hart_index = "riscv,hart-indexes";
> +       struct device_node *np = to_of_node(dev->fwnode);
> +
> +       if (!np || !of_property_present(np, prop_hart_index)) {
> +               *hart_index = logical_index;
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return of_property_read_u32_index(np, prop_hart_index,
> +                                         logical_index, hart_index);
> +}
> +
>  int aplic_direct_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs)
>  {
>         int i, j, rc, cpu, current_cpu, setup_count = 0;
> @@ -265,8 +280,12 @@ int aplic_direct_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs)
>                 cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &direct->lmask);
>
>                 idc = per_cpu_ptr(&aplic_idcs, cpu);
> -               idc->hart_index = i;
> -               idc->regs = priv->regs + APLIC_IDC_BASE + i * APLIC_IDC_SIZE;
> +               rc = aplic_direct_get_hart_index(dev, i, &idc->hart_index);
> +               if (rc) {
> +                       dev_warn(dev, "hart index not found for IDC%d\n", i);
> +                       continue;
> +               }
> +               idc->regs = priv->regs + APLIC_IDC_BASE + idc->hart_index * APLIC_IDC_SIZE;
>                 idc->direct = direct;
>
>                 aplic_idc_set_delivery(idc, true);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
index 7cd6b646774b..ea61329decb2 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@  struct aplic_direct {
 };
 
 struct aplic_idc {
-	unsigned int		hart_index;
+	u32			hart_index;
 	void __iomem		*regs;
 	struct aplic_direct	*direct;
 };
@@ -219,6 +219,21 @@  static int aplic_direct_parse_parent_hwirq(struct device *dev, u32 index,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int aplic_direct_get_hart_index(struct device *dev, u32 logical_index,
+				       u32 *hart_index)
+{
+	static const char *prop_hart_index = "riscv,hart-indexes";
+	struct device_node *np = to_of_node(dev->fwnode);
+
+	if (!np || !of_property_present(np, prop_hart_index)) {
+		*hart_index = logical_index;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return of_property_read_u32_index(np, prop_hart_index,
+					  logical_index, hart_index);
+}
+
 int aplic_direct_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs)
 {
 	int i, j, rc, cpu, current_cpu, setup_count = 0;
@@ -265,8 +280,12 @@  int aplic_direct_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs)
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &direct->lmask);
 
 		idc = per_cpu_ptr(&aplic_idcs, cpu);
-		idc->hart_index = i;
-		idc->regs = priv->regs + APLIC_IDC_BASE + i * APLIC_IDC_SIZE;
+		rc = aplic_direct_get_hart_index(dev, i, &idc->hart_index);
+		if (rc) {
+			dev_warn(dev, "hart index not found for IDC%d\n", i);
+			continue;
+		}
+		idc->regs = priv->regs + APLIC_IDC_BASE + idc->hart_index * APLIC_IDC_SIZE;
 		idc->direct = direct;
 
 		aplic_idc_set_delivery(idc, true);