From patchwork Fri Jun 9 02:12:14 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Xu, Haibo1" X-Patchwork-Id: 13273145 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75808C83005 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=g61UCCQULt2o+XXJUrt3FdJ10b4Esa4xZeCsho7/jkM=; b=vtuOsK2HFnI0l3 N8tpxDvyG8B2ox81RhpBXWLaH8pDXSRB1s/KgFvue0KLT9H78OX/OJ1GbnS7nc01Tb1JYgv9ypY2o dnNr6yilsbuLRte+94N8FhZwVYkajOYMMI5zoLxMF0FGQ9HdqpU4LAnj/Zr2/lkDjSCPw0fqgLekF rTwYuxL4ZFCQo8SbbOJyZ9MyGPjW27BLJZAhLdQPPAtKpetTKHDMAF5gr57x5PU5CPgUHe/pKt0sN V2568MVd/GmWkUJG/0v5u6Kymo5EBAEt8FLvMZ8L2Q4WhP8hTTiOTf5a8yziyas9ia1AIy38LkojE 12s9ilh5eFyRP3qF+w2Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q7RXT-00BH2x-1F; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 02:07:43 +0000 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q7RXN-00BGxC-0y; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 02:07:40 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1686276457; x=1717812457; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SkgRiEJV0A4sONxaKTrnMR8QmVnfMrm0hUNtPETEcYk=; b=DZpPKdYT+IzOho9aK4g2+jaW5yYOwD9sa93YonfkbI26K7WUIoUWPqAt XEfiZpVpgWCSQd0W7oKQR4b0slpQrShEVxyQLJmvyZpZ49j+WdAsf8awU QS2Dfm/vTUieBJEaMSQlfKpLWTXyt8/nHbqf4rKWOGHObQ7Ea1ytVuDM/ ayoAfk6ZcsQmVFQVcQDU/vI6vjqrMc3YW9hNH+xbSfhl6AOk+W1hdDWis V1LhlIn7wXYRUmBdV+v/P+TtOAgyf5u4xRua/qxX4zSbTm727kO989jRx jFaPlDCVDqmQjc4XDNroslBu0h+z+lJuEJOEcBWdjR1b6um+nWbLp3+hZ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10735"; a="359975550" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,228,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="359975550" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jun 2023 19:07:36 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10735"; a="713334816" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,228,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="713334816" Received: from haibo-optiplex-7090.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.132]) by fmsmga007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jun 2023 19:07:29 -0700 From: Haibo Xu To: Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Shuah Khan , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Ben Gardon , David Matlack , Vipin Sharma , Colton Lewis , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: arm64: selftests: Split get-reg-list test code Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 10:12:14 +0800 Message-Id: <7246358ae9656e7d36bf7cbab11e74354aac9099.1686275310.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230608_190737_446341_1FC18450 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 30.17 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Andrew Jones Split the arch-neutral test code out of aarch64/get-reg-list.c into get-reg-list.c. To do this we invent a new make variable $(SPLIT_TESTS) which expects common parts to be in the KVM selftests root and the counterparts to have the same name, but be in $(ARCH_DIR). There's still some work to be done to de-aarch64 the common get-reg-list.c, but we leave that to the next patch to avoid modifying too much code while moving it. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 10 +- .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 361 +---------------- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 371 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 385 insertions(+), 357 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile index 4761b768b773..d90cad19c9ee 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile @@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED_x86_64 += x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/aarch32_id_regs TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/arch_timer TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/debug-exceptions -TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/get-reg-list TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/hypercalls TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/page_fault_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/psci_test @@ -151,6 +150,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += access_tracking_perf_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += demand_paging_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_perf_test +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += get-reg-list TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_page_table_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += memslot_modification_stress_test @@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_page_table_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += set_memory_region_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_binary_stats_test +SPLIT_TESTS += get-reg-list + TEST_PROGS += $(TEST_PROGS_$(ARCH_DIR)) TEST_GEN_PROGS += $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_$(ARCH_DIR)) TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED += $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED_$(ARCH_DIR)) @@ -224,8 +226,12 @@ LIBKVM_C_OBJ := $(patsubst %.c, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_C)) LIBKVM_S_OBJ := $(patsubst %.S, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_S)) LIBKVM_STRING_OBJ := $(patsubst %.c, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_STRING)) LIBKVM_OBJS = $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_STRING_OBJ) +SPLIT_TESTS_TARGETS := $(patsubst %, $(OUTPUT)/%, $(SPLIT_TESTS)) +SPLIT_TESTS_OBJS := $(patsubst %, $(ARCH_DIR)/%.o, $(SPLIT_TESTS)) + +EXTRA_CLEAN += $(LIBKVM_OBJS) $(SPLIT_TESTS_OBJS) cscope.* -EXTRA_CLEAN += $(LIBKVM_OBJS) cscope.* +$(SPLIT_TESTS_TARGETS): $(SPLIT_TESTS_OBJS) x := $(shell mkdir -p $(sort $(dir $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ)))) $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ): $(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c index c8b44389d2ee..aaf035c969ec 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c @@ -4,85 +4,18 @@ * * Copyright (C) 2020, Red Hat, Inc. * - * When attempting to migrate from a host with an older kernel to a host - * with a newer kernel we allow the newer kernel on the destination to - * list new registers with get-reg-list. We assume they'll be unused, at - * least until the guest reboots, and so they're relatively harmless. - * However, if the destination host with the newer kernel is missing - * registers which the source host with the older kernel has, then that's - * a regression in get-reg-list. This test checks for that regression by - * checking the current list against a blessed list. We should never have - * missing registers, but if new ones appear then they can probably be - * added to the blessed list. A completely new blessed list can be created - * by running the test with the --list command line argument. - * - * Note, the blessed list should be created from the oldest possible - * kernel. We can't go older than v5.2, though, because that's the first + * While the blessed list should be created from the oldest possible + * kernel, we can't go older than v5.2, though, because that's the first * release which includes df205b5c6328 ("KVM: arm64: Filter out invalid * core register IDs in KVM_GET_REG_LIST"). Without that commit the core * registers won't match expectations. */ #include -#include -#include -#include -#include -#include #include "kvm_util.h" #include "test_util.h" #include "processor.h" -static struct kvm_reg_list *reg_list; -static __u64 *blessed_reg, blessed_n; - -static struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[]; -static int vcpu_configs_n; - -#define for_each_sublist(c, s) \ - for ((s) = &(c)->sublists[0]; (s)->regs; ++(s)) - -#define for_each_reg(i) \ - for ((i) = 0; (i) < reg_list->n; ++(i)) - -#define for_each_reg_filtered(i) \ - for_each_reg(i) \ - if (!filter_reg(reg_list->reg[i])) - -#define for_each_missing_reg(i) \ - for ((i) = 0; (i) < blessed_n; ++(i)) \ - if (!find_reg(reg_list->reg, reg_list->n, blessed_reg[i])) - -#define for_each_new_reg(i) \ - for_each_reg_filtered(i) \ - if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i])) - -static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) -{ - struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; - int len = 0; - - if (c->name) - return c->name; - - for_each_sublist(c, s) - len += strlen(s->name) + 1; - - c->name = malloc(len); - - len = 0; - for_each_sublist(c, s) { - if (!strcmp(s->name, "base")) - continue; - strcat(c->name + len, s->name); - len += strlen(s->name) + 1; - c->name[len - 1] = '+'; - } - c->name[len - 1] = '\0'; - - return c->name; -} - -static bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) +bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) { /* * DEMUX register presence depends on the host's CLIDR_EL1. @@ -94,16 +27,6 @@ static bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) return false; } -static bool find_reg(__u64 regs[], __u64 nr_regs, __u64 reg) -{ - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < nr_regs; ++i) - if (reg == regs[i]) - return true; - return false; -} - #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS 2 @@ -187,7 +110,7 @@ static const char *sve_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id) return NULL; } -static void print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) +void print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) { unsigned op0, op1, crn, crm, op2; const char *reg_size = NULL; @@ -267,278 +190,6 @@ static void print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) } } -static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) -{ - struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; - - for_each_sublist(c, s) - if (s->capability) - init->features[s->feature / 32] |= 1 << (s->feature % 32); -} - -static void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c) -{ - struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; - int feature; - - for_each_sublist(c, s) { - if (s->finalize) { - feature = s->feature; - vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE, &feature); - } - } -} - -static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) -{ - struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; - - for_each_sublist(c, s) { - if (!s->capability) - continue; - - __TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(s->capability), - "%s: %s not available, skipping tests\n", - config_name(c), s->name); - } -} - -static bool print_list; -static bool print_filtered; - -static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) -{ - struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; - int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n; - int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0; - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; - struct kvm_vm *vm; - struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; - - check_supported(c); - - vm = vm_create_barebones(); - prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); - vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); - aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); - finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c); - - reg_list = vcpu_get_reg_list(vcpu); - - if (print_list || print_filtered) { - putchar('\n'); - for_each_reg(i) { - __u64 id = reg_list->reg[i]; - if ((print_list && !filter_reg(id)) || - (print_filtered && filter_reg(id))) - print_reg(config_name(c), id); - } - putchar('\n'); - return; - } - - /* - * We only test that we can get the register and then write back the - * same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written - * back, but others only allow some bits to be changed, and at least - * for ID registers set will fail if the value does not exactly match - * what was returned by get. If registers that allow other values to - * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should - * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test - * executable. - */ - for_each_reg(i) { - uint8_t addr[2048 / 8]; - struct kvm_one_reg reg = { - .id = reg_list->reg[i], - .addr = (__u64)&addr, - }; - bool reject_reg = false; - int ret; - - ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_list->reg[i], &addr); - if (ret) { - printf("%s: Failed to get ", config_name(c)); - print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); - putchar('\n'); - ++failed_get; - } - - /* rejects_set registers are rejected after KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE */ - for_each_sublist(c, s) { - if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { - reject_reg = true; - ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); - if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { - printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); - print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); - putchar('\n'); - ++failed_reject; - } - break; - } - } - - if (!reject_reg) { - ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); - if (ret) { - printf("%s: Failed to set ", config_name(c)); - print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); - putchar('\n'); - ++failed_set; - } - } - } - - for_each_sublist(c, s) - blessed_n += s->regs_n; - blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64)); - - n = 0; - for_each_sublist(c, s) { - for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i) - blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i]; - } - - for_each_new_reg(i) - ++new_regs; - - for_each_missing_reg(i) - ++missing_regs; - - if (new_regs || missing_regs) { - n = 0; - for_each_reg_filtered(i) - ++n; - - printf("%s: Number blessed registers: %5lld\n", config_name(c), blessed_n); - printf("%s: Number registers: %5lld (includes %lld filtered registers)\n", - config_name(c), reg_list->n, reg_list->n - n); - } - - if (new_regs) { - printf("\n%s: There are %d new registers.\n" - "Consider adding them to the blessed reg " - "list with the following lines:\n\n", config_name(c), new_regs); - for_each_new_reg(i) - print_reg(config_name(c), reg_list->reg[i]); - putchar('\n'); - } - - if (missing_regs) { - printf("\n%s: There are %d missing registers.\n" - "The following lines are missing registers:\n\n", config_name(c), missing_regs); - for_each_missing_reg(i) - print_reg(config_name(c), blessed_reg[i]); - putchar('\n'); - } - - TEST_ASSERT(!missing_regs && !failed_get && !failed_set && !failed_reject, - "%s: There are %d missing registers; " - "%d registers failed get; %d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject", - config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject); - - pr_info("%s: PASS\n", config_name(c)); - blessed_n = 0; - free(blessed_reg); - free(reg_list); - kvm_vm_free(vm); -} - -static void help(void) -{ - struct vcpu_reg_list *c; - int i; - - printf( - "\n" - "usage: get-reg-list [--config=] [--list] [--list-filtered]\n\n" - " --config= Used to select a specific vcpu configuration for the test/listing\n" - " '' may be\n"); - - for (i = 0; i < vcpu_configs_n; ++i) { - c = vcpu_configs[i]; - printf( - " '%s'\n", config_name(c)); - } - - printf( - "\n" - " --list Print the register list rather than test it (requires --config)\n" - " --list-filtered Print registers that would normally be filtered out (requires --config)\n" - "\n" - ); -} - -static struct vcpu_reg_list *parse_config(const char *config) -{ - struct vcpu_reg_list *c; - int i; - - if (config[8] != '=') - help(), exit(1); - - for (i = 0; i < vcpu_configs_n; ++i) { - c = vcpu_configs[i]; - if (strcmp(config_name(c), &config[9]) == 0) - break; - } - - if (i == vcpu_configs_n) - help(), exit(1); - - return c; -} - -int main(int ac, char **av) -{ - struct vcpu_reg_list *c, *sel = NULL; - int i, ret = 0; - pid_t pid; - - for (i = 1; i < ac; ++i) { - if (strncmp(av[i], "--config", 8) == 0) - sel = parse_config(av[i]); - else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list") == 0) - print_list = true; - else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list-filtered") == 0) - print_filtered = true; - else if (strcmp(av[i], "--help") == 0 || strcmp(av[1], "-h") == 0) - help(), exit(0); - else - help(), exit(1); - } - - if (print_list || print_filtered) { - /* - * We only want to print the register list of a single config. - */ - if (!sel) - help(), exit(1); - } - - for (i = 0; i < vcpu_configs_n; ++i) { - c = vcpu_configs[i]; - if (sel && c != sel) - continue; - - pid = fork(); - - if (!pid) { - run_test(c); - exit(0); - } else { - int wstatus; - pid_t wpid = wait(&wstatus); - TEST_ASSERT(wpid == pid && WIFEXITED(wstatus), "wait: Unexpected return"); - if (WEXITSTATUS(wstatus) && WEXITSTATUS(wstatus) != KSFT_SKIP) - ret = KSFT_FAIL; - } - } - - return ret; -} - /* * The original blessed list was primed with the output of kernel version * v4.15 with --core-reg-fixup and then later updated with new registers. @@ -1022,7 +673,7 @@ static struct vcpu_reg_list pauth_pmu_config = { }, }; -static struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[] = { +struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[] = { &vregs_config, &vregs_pmu_config, &sve_config, @@ -1030,4 +681,4 @@ static struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[] = { &pauth_config, &pauth_pmu_config, }; -static int vcpu_configs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu_configs); +int vcpu_configs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu_configs); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..69bb91087081 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -0,0 +1,371 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Check for KVM_GET_REG_LIST regressions. + * + * Copyright (C) 2020, Red Hat, Inc. + * + * When attempting to migrate from a host with an older kernel to a host + * with a newer kernel we allow the newer kernel on the destination to + * list new registers with get-reg-list. We assume they'll be unused, at + * least until the guest reboots, and so they're relatively harmless. + * However, if the destination host with the newer kernel is missing + * registers which the source host with the older kernel has, then that's + * a regression in get-reg-list. This test checks for that regression by + * checking the current list against a blessed list. We should never have + * missing registers, but if new ones appear then they can probably be + * added to the blessed list. A completely new blessed list can be created + * by running the test with the --list command line argument. + * + * The blessed list should be created from the oldest possible kernel. + */ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include "kvm_util.h" +#include "test_util.h" +#include "processor.h" + +static struct kvm_reg_list *reg_list; +static __u64 *blessed_reg, blessed_n; + +extern struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[]; +extern int vcpu_configs_n; + +#define for_each_sublist(c, s) \ + for ((s) = &(c)->sublists[0]; (s)->regs; ++(s)) + +#define for_each_reg(i) \ + for ((i) = 0; (i) < reg_list->n; ++(i)) + +#define for_each_reg_filtered(i) \ + for_each_reg(i) \ + if (!filter_reg(reg_list->reg[i])) + +#define for_each_missing_reg(i) \ + for ((i) = 0; (i) < blessed_n; ++(i)) \ + if (!find_reg(reg_list->reg, reg_list->n, blessed_reg[i])) + +#define for_each_new_reg(i) \ + for_each_reg_filtered(i) \ + if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i])) + +static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) +{ + struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; + int len = 0; + + if (c->name) + return c->name; + + for_each_sublist(c, s) + len += strlen(s->name) + 1; + + c->name = malloc(len); + + len = 0; + for_each_sublist(c, s) { + if (!strcmp(s->name, "base")) + continue; + strcat(c->name + len, s->name); + len += strlen(s->name) + 1; + c->name[len - 1] = '+'; + } + c->name[len - 1] = '\0'; + + return c->name; +} + +bool __weak filter_reg(__u64 reg) +{ + return false; +} + +static bool find_reg(__u64 regs[], __u64 nr_regs, __u64 reg) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < nr_regs; ++i) + if (reg == regs[i]) + return true; + return false; +} + +void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) +{ + printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); +} + +static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) +{ + struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; + + for_each_sublist(c, s) + if (s->capability) + init->features[s->feature / 32] |= 1 << (s->feature % 32); +} + +static void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c) +{ + struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; + int feature; + + for_each_sublist(c, s) { + if (s->finalize) { + feature = s->feature; + vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE, &feature); + } + } +} + +static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) +{ + struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; + + for_each_sublist(c, s) { + if (!s->capability) + continue; + + __TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(s->capability), + "%s: %s not available, skipping tests\n", + config_name(c), s->name); + } +} + +static bool print_list; +static bool print_filtered; + +static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) +{ + struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; + int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n; + int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + struct kvm_vm *vm; + struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; + + check_supported(c); + + vm = vm_create_barebones(); + prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); + vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); + aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); + finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c); + + reg_list = vcpu_get_reg_list(vcpu); + + if (print_list || print_filtered) { + putchar('\n'); + for_each_reg(i) { + __u64 id = reg_list->reg[i]; + if ((print_list && !filter_reg(id)) || + (print_filtered && filter_reg(id))) + print_reg(config_name(c), id); + } + putchar('\n'); + return; + } + + /* + * We only test that we can get the register and then write back the + * same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written + * back, but others only allow some bits to be changed, and at least + * for ID registers set will fail if the value does not exactly match + * what was returned by get. If registers that allow other values to + * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should + * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test + * executable. + */ + for_each_reg(i) { + uint8_t addr[2048 / 8]; + struct kvm_one_reg reg = { + .id = reg_list->reg[i], + .addr = (__u64)&addr, + }; + bool reject_reg = false; + int ret; + + ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_list->reg[i], &addr); + if (ret) { + printf("%s: Failed to get ", config_name(c)); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); + putchar('\n'); + ++failed_get; + } + + /* rejects_set registers are rejected after KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE */ + for_each_sublist(c, s) { + if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { + reject_reg = true; + ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); + if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { + printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); + putchar('\n'); + ++failed_reject; + } + break; + } + } + + if (!reject_reg) { + ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); + if (ret) { + printf("%s: Failed to set ", config_name(c)); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); + putchar('\n'); + ++failed_set; + } + } + } + + for_each_sublist(c, s) + blessed_n += s->regs_n; + blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64)); + + n = 0; + for_each_sublist(c, s) { + for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i) + blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i]; + } + + for_each_new_reg(i) + ++new_regs; + + for_each_missing_reg(i) + ++missing_regs; + + if (new_regs || missing_regs) { + n = 0; + for_each_reg_filtered(i) + ++n; + + printf("%s: Number blessed registers: %5lld\n", config_name(c), blessed_n); + printf("%s: Number registers: %5lld (includes %lld filtered registers)\n", + config_name(c), reg_list->n, reg_list->n - n); + } + + if (new_regs) { + printf("\n%s: There are %d new registers.\n" + "Consider adding them to the blessed reg " + "list with the following lines:\n\n", config_name(c), new_regs); + for_each_new_reg(i) + print_reg(config_name(c), reg_list->reg[i]); + putchar('\n'); + } + + if (missing_regs) { + printf("\n%s: There are %d missing registers.\n" + "The following lines are missing registers:\n\n", config_name(c), missing_regs); + for_each_missing_reg(i) + print_reg(config_name(c), blessed_reg[i]); + putchar('\n'); + } + + TEST_ASSERT(!missing_regs && !failed_get && !failed_set && !failed_reject, + "%s: There are %d missing registers; " + "%d registers failed get; %d registers failed set; %d registers failed reject", + config_name(c), missing_regs, failed_get, failed_set, failed_reject); + + pr_info("%s: PASS\n", config_name(c)); + blessed_n = 0; + free(blessed_reg); + free(reg_list); + kvm_vm_free(vm); +} + +static void help(void) +{ + struct vcpu_reg_list *c; + int i; + + printf( + "\n" + "usage: get-reg-list [--config=] [--list] [--list-filtered]\n\n" + " --config= Used to select a specific vcpu configuration for the test/listing\n" + " '' may be\n"); + + for (i = 0; i < vcpu_configs_n; ++i) { + c = vcpu_configs[i]; + printf( + " '%s'\n", config_name(c)); + } + + printf( + "\n" + " --list Print the register list rather than test it (requires --config)\n" + " --list-filtered Print registers that would normally be filtered out (requires --config)\n" + "\n" + ); +} + +static struct vcpu_reg_list *parse_config(const char *config) +{ + struct vcpu_reg_list *c = NULL; + int i; + + if (config[8] != '=') + help(), exit(1); + + for (i = 0; i < vcpu_configs_n; ++i) { + c = vcpu_configs[i]; + if (strcmp(config_name(c), &config[9]) == 0) + break; + } + + if (i == vcpu_configs_n) + help(), exit(1); + + return c; +} + +int main(int ac, char **av) +{ + struct vcpu_reg_list *c, *sel = NULL; + int i, ret = 0; + pid_t pid; + + for (i = 1; i < ac; ++i) { + if (strncmp(av[i], "--config", 8) == 0) + sel = parse_config(av[i]); + else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list") == 0) + print_list = true; + else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list-filtered") == 0) + print_filtered = true; + else if (strcmp(av[i], "--help") == 0 || strcmp(av[1], "-h") == 0) + help(), exit(0); + else + help(), exit(1); + } + + if (print_list || print_filtered) { + /* + * We only want to print the register list of a single config. + */ + if (!sel) + help(), exit(1); + } + + for (i = 0; i < vcpu_configs_n; ++i) { + c = vcpu_configs[i]; + if (sel && c != sel) + continue; + + pid = fork(); + + if (!pid) { + run_test(c); + exit(0); + } else { + int wstatus; + pid_t wpid = wait(&wstatus); + TEST_ASSERT(wpid == pid && WIFEXITED(wstatus), "wait: Unexpected return"); + if (WEXITSTATUS(wstatus) && WEXITSTATUS(wstatus) != KSFT_SKIP) + ret = KSFT_FAIL; + } + } + + return ret; +}