Message ID | 1498739271-27431-4-git-send-email-david.wu@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 20:27:49 +0800 David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com> wrote: > It is usually possible to configure the polarity, cycle and duty all at once, > so that the polarity and cycle and duty should be binding together. Move it > into rockchip_pwm_config(), as well as prepared for the next atomic update > commit. > > As the rk2928-pwm is different from rk3288-pwm, the rk2928-pwm doesn't support > the polarity, use the pwm_config_v1 and pwm_config_v2 to distinguish them. > > Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c > index cd45f17..eb630ff 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > #define PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE (0 << 3) > #define PWM_INACTIVE_NEGATIVE (0 << 4) > #define PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE (1 << 4) > +#define PWM_POLARITY_MASK (PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE) > #define PWM_OUTPUT_LEFT (0 << 5) > #define PWM_LP_DISABLE (0 << 8) > > @@ -52,10 +53,12 @@ struct rockchip_pwm_data { > const struct pwm_ops *ops; > > void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, > - struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable, > - enum pwm_polarity polarity); > + struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable); > void (*get_state)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > struct pwm_state *state); > + void (*pwm_config)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > + int duty_ns, int period_ns, > + enum pwm_polarity polarity); > }; Hm, maybe it's time to drop these custom hooks and implement pwm_apply_v1 and pwm_apply_v2 instead. > > static inline struct rockchip_pwm_chip *to_rockchip_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *c) > @@ -64,8 +67,7 @@ static inline struct rockchip_pwm_chip *to_rockchip_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *c) > } > > static void rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, > - struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable, > - enum pwm_polarity polarity) > + struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable) > { > struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); > u32 enable_conf = PWM_CTRL_OUTPUT_EN | PWM_CTRL_TIMER_EN; > @@ -95,19 +97,13 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_get_state_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, > } > > static void rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, > - struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable, > - enum pwm_polarity polarity) > + struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable) > { > struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); > u32 enable_conf = PWM_OUTPUT_LEFT | PWM_LP_DISABLE | PWM_ENABLE | > PWM_CONTINUOUS; > u32 val; > > - if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) > - enable_conf |= PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE; > - else > - enable_conf |= PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_NEGATIVE; > - > val = readl_relaxed(pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl); > > if (enable) > @@ -165,12 +161,42 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, > clk_disable(pc->pclk); > } > > -static void rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > - int duty_ns, int period_ns) > +static void rockchip_pwm_config_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, > + struct pwm_device *pwm, > + int duty_ns, int period_ns, > + enum pwm_polarity polarity) > +{ > + struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); > + unsigned long period, duty; > + u64 clk_rate, div; > + > + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk); > + > + /* > + * Since period and duty cycle registers have a width of 32 > + * bits, every possible input period can be obtained using the > + * default prescaler value for all practical clock rate values. > + */ > + div = clk_rate * period_ns; > + period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div, > + pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC); > + > + div = clk_rate * duty_ns; > + duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div, pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC); > + > + writel(period, pc->base + pc->data->regs.period); > + writel(duty, pc->base + pc->data->regs.duty); > +} > + > +static void rockchip_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, > + struct pwm_device *pwm, > + int duty_ns, int period_ns, > + enum pwm_polarity polarity) > { > struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); > unsigned long period, duty; > u64 clk_rate, div; > + u32 ctrl; > > clk_rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk); > > @@ -188,12 +214,20 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > > writel(period, pc->base + pc->data->regs.period); > writel(duty, pc->base + pc->data->regs.duty); > + > + ctrl = readl_relaxed(pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl); > + ctrl &= ~PWM_POLARITY_MASK; > + if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) > + ctrl |= PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE; > + else > + ctrl |= PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_NEGATIVE; > + > + writel(ctrl, pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl); > } > > static int rockchip_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, > struct pwm_device *pwm, > - bool enable, > - enum pwm_polarity polarity) > + bool enable) > { > struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); > int ret; > @@ -204,7 +238,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, > return ret; > } > > - pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, enable, polarity); > + pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, enable); > > if (!enable) > clk_disable(pc->clk); > @@ -228,17 +262,17 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > return ret; > > if (state->polarity != curstate.polarity && enabled) { > - ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, false, state->polarity); > + ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, false); > if (ret) > goto out; > enabled = false; > } > > - rockchip_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period); > + pc->data->pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, > + state->period, state->polarity); > > if (state->enabled != enabled) { > - ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, state->enabled, > - state->polarity); > + ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, state->enabled); > if (ret) > goto out; > } > @@ -278,6 +312,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > .ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops_v1, > .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1, > .get_state = rockchip_pwm_get_state_v1, > + .pwm_config = rockchip_pwm_config_v1, > }; > > static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v2 = { > @@ -292,6 +327,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > .ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops_v2, > .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2, > .get_state = rockchip_pwm_get_state_v2, > + .pwm_config = rockchip_pwm_config_v2, > }; > > static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_vop = { > @@ -306,6 +342,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > .ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops_v2, > .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2, > .get_state = rockchip_pwm_get_state_v2, > + .pwm_config = rockchip_pwm_config_v2, > }; > > static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
Hi Boris, 在 2017/7/4 2:36, Boris Brezillon 写道: > Hm, maybe it's time to drop these custom hooks and implement > pwm_apply_v1 and pwm_apply_v2 instead. Okay, drop the enable and config hooks, only use the apply hook to instead them.
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c index cd45f17..eb630ff 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #define PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE (0 << 3) #define PWM_INACTIVE_NEGATIVE (0 << 4) #define PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE (1 << 4) +#define PWM_POLARITY_MASK (PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE) #define PWM_OUTPUT_LEFT (0 << 5) #define PWM_LP_DISABLE (0 << 8) @@ -52,10 +53,12 @@ struct rockchip_pwm_data { const struct pwm_ops *ops; void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable, - enum pwm_polarity polarity); + struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable); void (*get_state)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state); + void (*pwm_config)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + int duty_ns, int period_ns, + enum pwm_polarity polarity); }; static inline struct rockchip_pwm_chip *to_rockchip_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *c) @@ -64,8 +67,7 @@ static inline struct rockchip_pwm_chip *to_rockchip_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *c) } static void rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable, - enum pwm_polarity polarity) + struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable) { struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); u32 enable_conf = PWM_CTRL_OUTPUT_EN | PWM_CTRL_TIMER_EN; @@ -95,19 +97,13 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_get_state_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, } static void rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable, - enum pwm_polarity polarity) + struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable) { struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); u32 enable_conf = PWM_OUTPUT_LEFT | PWM_LP_DISABLE | PWM_ENABLE | PWM_CONTINUOUS; u32 val; - if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) - enable_conf |= PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE; - else - enable_conf |= PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_NEGATIVE; - val = readl_relaxed(pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl); if (enable) @@ -165,12 +161,42 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, clk_disable(pc->pclk); } -static void rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, - int duty_ns, int period_ns) +static void rockchip_pwm_config_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, + struct pwm_device *pwm, + int duty_ns, int period_ns, + enum pwm_polarity polarity) +{ + struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); + unsigned long period, duty; + u64 clk_rate, div; + + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk); + + /* + * Since period and duty cycle registers have a width of 32 + * bits, every possible input period can be obtained using the + * default prescaler value for all practical clock rate values. + */ + div = clk_rate * period_ns; + period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div, + pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC); + + div = clk_rate * duty_ns; + duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div, pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC); + + writel(period, pc->base + pc->data->regs.period); + writel(duty, pc->base + pc->data->regs.duty); +} + +static void rockchip_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, + struct pwm_device *pwm, + int duty_ns, int period_ns, + enum pwm_polarity polarity) { struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); unsigned long period, duty; u64 clk_rate, div; + u32 ctrl; clk_rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk); @@ -188,12 +214,20 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, writel(period, pc->base + pc->data->regs.period); writel(duty, pc->base + pc->data->regs.duty); + + ctrl = readl_relaxed(pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl); + ctrl &= ~PWM_POLARITY_MASK; + if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) + ctrl |= PWM_DUTY_NEGATIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE; + else + ctrl |= PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_NEGATIVE; + + writel(ctrl, pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl); } static int rockchip_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, - bool enable, - enum pwm_polarity polarity) + bool enable) { struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip); int ret; @@ -204,7 +238,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, return ret; } - pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, enable, polarity); + pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, enable); if (!enable) clk_disable(pc->clk); @@ -228,17 +262,17 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, return ret; if (state->polarity != curstate.polarity && enabled) { - ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, false, state->polarity); + ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, false); if (ret) goto out; enabled = false; } - rockchip_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period); + pc->data->pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, + state->period, state->polarity); if (state->enabled != enabled) { - ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, state->enabled, - state->polarity); + ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, state->enabled); if (ret) goto out; } @@ -278,6 +312,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, .ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops_v1, .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1, .get_state = rockchip_pwm_get_state_v1, + .pwm_config = rockchip_pwm_config_v1, }; static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v2 = { @@ -292,6 +327,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, .ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops_v2, .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2, .get_state = rockchip_pwm_get_state_v2, + .pwm_config = rockchip_pwm_config_v2, }; static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_vop = { @@ -306,6 +342,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, .ops = &rockchip_pwm_ops_v2, .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2, .get_state = rockchip_pwm_get_state_v2, + .pwm_config = rockchip_pwm_config_v2, }; static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
It is usually possible to configure the polarity, cycle and duty all at once, so that the polarity and cycle and duty should be binding together. Move it into rockchip_pwm_config(), as well as prepared for the next atomic update commit. As the rk2928-pwm is different from rk3288-pwm, the rk2928-pwm doesn't support the polarity, use the pwm_config_v1 and pwm_config_v2 to distinguish them. Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com> --- drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)