From patchwork Mon Jan 14 11:15:09 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 10762209 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2D71390 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29FA28B7F for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id F070628B87; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:21:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F06DA28B7F for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:21:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=wHonAZF3wzSTUwPRSkX0crBKvqtfXDRpHMZZwk9c/ik=; b=d4tbD2TPmcW131 xveKXF7OA1gZJWV61yiRTTfZ+JMNenLGP+W+spOSf8Y2OOp9S3zvh5ItKiWTkkZfs18ShIVV4XqPz EfY/+pfY3NiMXiUA+AFxxJllMObxS6zJyA5XyED+BiejKgeGIlWYCvYWQed63llIsZ+9vbgrrLGwz 79vC2yv4tWeJqQue2DpSbWyc3P6J0k9k+ae67P7DBTfzVkAGoyoQRZl4kFKmgai2u1tNtkScZ8BEI 2WLIY1qKUPvb7A2hnT+jHYruST25YFTkmhebfBM0p6vBxaQCWB9QJGwo+bMCjSMiBFw7imsb4JByG Z7IIzI4g0ZxgrQhU8O+w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gj0JE-0006UU-Qe; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:21:36 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gj0EJ-0000Mz-6l; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:17:06 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0EBGQCi112768; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 05:16:26 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1547464586; bh=2uDrXrY9NBnXdAPSRPaCNiNMbVveMwv8owns43GbBkk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=MnarZvlipwvByteR3HR6kltcgVuYCM0wZpb5rzGs4pZVXqEnEZBpmj1sk9kt2QyF4 POUlhOGDIdZ2IpMJHyexPlsRBF9xR64X1xu08d98srBPQvUZ4mSDpDC3vV33FKErrk Hkmr5VYlTuIxOxMrjwC0UdeXhHXDpTVPOgQCbPiM= Received: from DLEE100.ent.ti.com (dlee100.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.30]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0EBGQAU024080 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 05:16:26 -0600 Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) by DLEE100.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 05:16:25 -0600 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 05:16:25 -0600 Received: from a0393678ub.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x0EBFd1d011560; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 05:16:22 -0600 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Gustavo Pimentel , Alan Douglas , Shawn Lin , Heiko Stuebner Subject: [PATCH v2 11/15] PCI: pci-epf-test: Use pci_epc_get_features to get EPC features Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:45:09 +0530 Message-ID: <20190114111513.21618-12-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190114111513.21618-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20190114111513.21618-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190114_031631_862634_72157E7F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.64 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Use pci_epc_get_features to get EPC features such as linkup notifier support, MSI/MSIX capable, BAR configuration etc and use it for configuring pci-epf-test. Since these features are now obtained directly from EPC driver, remove pci_epf_test_data which was initially added to have EPC features in endpoint function driver. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I --- drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 87 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c index ade296180383..2e0fb231ce0c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c @@ -47,9 +47,8 @@ struct pci_epf_test { void *reg[6]; struct pci_epf *epf; enum pci_barno test_reg_bar; - bool linkup_notifier; - bool msix_available; struct delayed_work cmd_handler; + const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features; }; struct pci_epf_test_reg { @@ -71,11 +70,6 @@ static struct pci_epf_header test_header = { .interrupt_pin = PCI_INTERRUPT_INTA, }; -struct pci_epf_test_data { - enum pci_barno test_reg_bar; - bool linkup_notifier; -}; - static size_t bar_size[] = { 512, 512, 1024, 16384, 131072, 1048576 }; static int pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test) @@ -402,10 +396,16 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf) struct device *dev = &epf->dev; struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf); enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar; + const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features; + + epc_features = epf_test->epc_features; for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) { epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar]; + if (!!(epc_features->reserved_bar & (1 << bar))) + continue; + ret = pci_epc_set_bar(epc, epf->func_no, epf_bar); if (ret) { pci_epf_free_space(epf, epf_test->reg[bar], bar); @@ -433,6 +433,9 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf) void *base; int bar; enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar; + const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features; + + epc_features = epf_test->epc_features; base = pci_epf_alloc_space(epf, sizeof(struct pci_epf_test_reg), test_reg_bar); @@ -446,6 +449,10 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf) epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar]; if (bar == test_reg_bar) continue; + + if (!!(epc_features->reserved_bar & (1 << bar))) + continue; + base = pci_epf_alloc_space(epf, bar_size[bar], bar); if (!base) dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate space for BAR%d\n", @@ -458,25 +465,50 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf) return 0; } +static void pci_epf_configure_bar(struct pci_epf *epf, + const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features) +{ + struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar; + bool bar_fixed_64bit; + int i; + + for (i = BAR_0; i <= BAR_5; i++) { + epf_bar = &epf->bar[i]; + bar_fixed_64bit = !!(epc_features->bar_fixed_64bit & (1 << i)); + if (bar_fixed_64bit) + epf_bar->flags |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64; + if (epc_features->bar_fixed_size[i]) + bar_size[i] = epc_features->bar_fixed_size[i]; + } +} + static int pci_epf_test_bind(struct pci_epf *epf) { int ret; struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf); struct pci_epf_header *header = epf->header; + const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features; + enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = BAR_0; struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc; struct device *dev = &epf->dev; + bool linkup_notifier = false; + bool msix_capable = false; + bool msi_capable = true; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!epc)) return -EINVAL; - if (epc->features & EPC_FEATURE_NO_LINKUP_NOTIFIER) - epf_test->linkup_notifier = false; - else - epf_test->linkup_notifier = true; - - epf_test->msix_available = epc->features & EPC_FEATURE_MSIX_AVAILABLE; + epc_features = pci_epc_get_features(epc, epf->func_no); + if (epc_features) { + linkup_notifier = epc_features->linkup_notifier; + msix_capable = epc_features->msix_capable; + msi_capable = epc_features->msi_capable; + test_reg_bar = pci_epc_get_first_free_bar(epc_features); + pci_epf_configure_bar(epf, epc_features); + } - epf_test->test_reg_bar = EPC_FEATURE_GET_BAR(epc->features); + epf_test->test_reg_bar = test_reg_bar; + epf_test->epc_features = epc_features; ret = pci_epc_write_header(epc, epf->func_no, header); if (ret) { @@ -492,13 +524,15 @@ static int pci_epf_test_bind(struct pci_epf *epf) if (ret) return ret; - ret = pci_epc_set_msi(epc, epf->func_no, epf->msi_interrupts); - if (ret) { - dev_err(dev, "MSI configuration failed\n"); - return ret; + if (msi_capable) { + ret = pci_epc_set_msi(epc, epf->func_no, epf->msi_interrupts); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "MSI configuration failed\n"); + return ret; + } } - if (epf_test->msix_available) { + if (msix_capable) { ret = pci_epc_set_msix(epc, epf->func_no, epf->msix_interrupts); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "MSI-X configuration failed\n"); @@ -506,7 +540,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_bind(struct pci_epf *epf) } } - if (!epf_test->linkup_notifier) + if (!linkup_notifier) queue_work(kpcitest_workqueue, &epf_test->cmd_handler.work); return 0; @@ -523,17 +557,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_probe(struct pci_epf *epf) { struct pci_epf_test *epf_test; struct device *dev = &epf->dev; - const struct pci_epf_device_id *match; - struct pci_epf_test_data *data; - enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = BAR_0; - bool linkup_notifier = true; - - match = pci_epf_match_device(pci_epf_test_ids, epf); - data = (struct pci_epf_test_data *)match->driver_data; - if (data) { - test_reg_bar = data->test_reg_bar; - linkup_notifier = data->linkup_notifier; - } epf_test = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*epf_test), GFP_KERNEL); if (!epf_test) @@ -541,8 +564,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_probe(struct pci_epf *epf) epf->header = &test_header; epf_test->epf = epf; - epf_test->test_reg_bar = test_reg_bar; - epf_test->linkup_notifier = linkup_notifier; INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&epf_test->cmd_handler, pci_epf_test_cmd_handler);