From patchwork Tue Jun 4 13:15:05 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 10975127 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5102D49 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B805A1FFC8 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id ABAF026E54; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:19:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56AB31FFC8 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:19:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7ePmy0dlgdANMZy925Kgu9dqkfnPFCReL3pFDG5P+Js=; b=J1PYUXBKcHVv5F gl19LEO4TineX/lFYQdmDUPBTrAgho/ApqkOCbE4QKkILjK5sB9/mPaRpSu4BznYtjoOkqjotnSfN s2MxvbF3h23TbJghupMSVEeYh7p0TIIt1Y5dk7QsL5TPRPkUjGVoN4C0zSap8a8kKSgKKHksQcb7K OwyFKyZRFEKS1O3ZgL3qhCyFFjk2WKHPWthSH/xBJtUwFfxVrUjldbPlhao1RJggZsW+DxNf2p5Pd +9neLuQTifZun1/ClH5QbsqElIKyn88E7O7Us+N/Q6VUOHXf/rVF0q9YEZM0FavdgJ1S/JvZwztSR k1hIxx6UTxXtqbVxUsMQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hY9Lz-00062z-BD; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 13:19:51 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hY9Kp-0004U2-IJ; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 13:19:09 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x54DIVce082525; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:18:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1559654311; bh=jqsa++lCvjyELh9SjLjw9ykSFWnOzndvoFRmjfRfvbM=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=SJafN6MA92yKSz6dnMDxTTSbwugOvtBPxvXPk6dN9oGWrdM+bxvO9y+d+3fSZ2020 FjR8jknaD/OjckdHuenkfWAtz88nO3FnwFjWOjMOihJoROvPIjviRSeSN0KnSuHLPz /HYf2IOtakaVtsthLtvLltjaUW2Td3cPbKsUqTe8= Received: from DLEE104.ent.ti.com (dlee104.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.34]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x54DIVRw009609 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:18:31 -0500 Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) by DLEE104.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:18:30 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:18:30 -0500 Received: from a0393678ub.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x54DGdGZ098972; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:18:25 -0500 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Tom Joseph , Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , Gustavo Pimentel Subject: [RFC PATCH 19/30] PCI: endpoint: Add support to link a physical function to a virtual function Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 18:45:05 +0530 Message-ID: <20190604131516.13596-20-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190604131516.13596-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20190604131516.13596-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190604_061840_574578_4CBE000C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.77 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jingoo Han , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Frank Rowand , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP While the physical function has to be linked to endpoint controller, the virtual function has to be linked to a physical function. Add support to link a physical function to a virtual function in pci-ep-cfs. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I --- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c index e7e8367eead1..c18ef626ada5 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c @@ -350,6 +350,28 @@ static struct configfs_attribute *pci_epf_attrs[] = { NULL, }; +static int pci_epf_vepf_link(struct config_item *epf_pf_item, + struct config_item *epf_vf_item) +{ + struct pci_epf_group *epf_vf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_vf_item); + struct pci_epf_group *epf_pf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_pf_item); + struct pci_epf *epf_pf = epf_pf_group->epf; + struct pci_epf *epf_vf = epf_vf_group->epf; + + return pci_epf_add_vepf(epf_pf, epf_vf); +} + +static void pci_epf_vepf_unlink(struct config_item *epf_pf_item, + struct config_item *epf_vf_item) +{ + struct pci_epf_group *epf_vf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_vf_item); + struct pci_epf_group *epf_pf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_pf_item); + struct pci_epf *epf_pf = epf_pf_group->epf; + struct pci_epf *epf_vf = epf_vf_group->epf; + + pci_epf_remove_vepf(epf_pf, epf_vf); +} + static void pci_epf_release(struct config_item *item) { struct pci_epf_group *epf_group = to_pci_epf_group(item); @@ -362,6 +384,8 @@ static void pci_epf_release(struct config_item *item) } static struct configfs_item_operations pci_epf_ops = { + .allow_link = pci_epf_vepf_link, + .drop_link = pci_epf_vepf_unlink, .release = pci_epf_release, };