Message ID | 20200908150241.5771-7-krzk@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=WXCh=CR=lists.infradead.org=linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26BD59D for <patchwork-linux-rockchip@patchwork.kernel.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CDFF23E25 for <patchwork-linux-rockchip@patchwork.kernel.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="XCx9jKud"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="OQDgnwOk"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jJHkf7us" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6CDFF23E25 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To: From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=dEOx2U2D/b3Gz1XtXdDRDX+UDOyvDEVz3N1XYqKmAq4=; b=XCx9jKudmEf72/4BEOOR0CWUHf 5kC9l8W/s7jmyb66yvTKdTPrCuzNCCP6Oyc45z0c5KpzU0KtTP/ZhYjIwYNHlWH5/c0tmwzB8nqWy W3uGMr4iG3gaTFErikSFb+xUX7GE0CxSXjrEEF+FCqlvnCOklmUInr1LVosmsTD9S3dcBg3SIXWBt e0OzP+L84odlN8Ni09Sb+O1nzy0DXrGo+fFbr9EmwIFAkWEj1UyC2X1j/xZZqIUEM7KYaKIiMhAv4 HrhJaVvDFLpMZ/sxvyDLE4uxv6hctF7HdJacmLtrDf6hrVy0uLEBHaux6evI5Oz7bAnL2Xc5GXmTV jPsUGCQA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFfB8-0005dr-B8; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:05:02 +0000 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFfB4-0005d3-KH; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:04:58 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=QCvpU8wDeMAbygDBwOjTqrsfQc8RWle5Vd2PhRpLOiM=; b=OQDgnwOkjAAuRTD6yrvJ6UYAHP +/IXTA74gNNGTSlr1rg4h8Uq4yjJLSEv8stGf/feF6zKpztKCQ6sDQKlsWUwihFV3IPydvKbwL/6Y Ptfm08SbIHpl+IDFDaj3REr4kMuLGQNd/LxV7sKtfXf1cCa/bRHlrFFc9cSnqx1BRQHYU4Vs+BHD0 V0HK/q6auphB3fpWeG3wu/7J5eSdhf4K3ruYEOcWrQJ1NQVzr/fsRn+3ELkAL6qOsRiD6RQ+KNf8G Xw+VS7FWCMp4pyU/RhodgLwgTP9MR8DA1XlSaQhH3WmxmBi8YgReV9HYi5pGdLvyNxr+gV4n3zVBR kkYaPO/A==; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFfAv-0003c5-5U; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:04:57 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [194.230.155.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5700723CCD; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599577457; bh=r+iOPiiCSkXns7k2RkP8i4/NmDfyYnNqQ4In2aeIt3Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jJHkf7usnzFhyUf/Fa5vOLIFVRp2+pRE6BGupDSAWWzz+DSInpH5BCytIfrTFGo0Q vx/aeXNSevkKQNd2DIv3WBOUOUD92maIqkcwcrrzBEP+w6EJTxRQTzY4Cwr/omuHNC ygi6WNQsotLEetkIwpcPi3Vk+CjEr2ASBaPLKfzA= From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>, Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>, Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>, Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com>, Alifer Moraes <alifer.wsdm@gmail.com>, Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>, "Angus Ainslie (Purism)" <angus@akkea.ca>, Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>, Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>, Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@xilinx.com>, Anurag Kumar Vulisha <anurag.kumar.vulisha@xilinx.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: zynqmp-zcu100-revC: Correct interrupt flags in examples Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:02:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20200908150241.5771-7-krzk@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200908150241.5771-1-krzk@kernel.org> References: <20200908150241.5771-1-krzk@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200908_160452_315244_9170561B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.97 ) X-Spam-Score: -7.2 (-------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on casper.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-7.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [198.145.29.99 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms <linux-rockchip.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-rockchip>, <mailto:linux-rockchip-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-rockchip-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip>, <mailto:linux-rockchip-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" <linux-rockchip-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+patchwork-linux-rockchip=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
[1/8] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: Correct interrupt flags in examples
|
expand
|
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts index d60110ad8367..c9460693f4e9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ compatible = "ti,tps65086"; reg = <0x5e>; interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; - interrupts = <77 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + interrupts = <77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; #gpio-cells = <2>; gpio-controller; };
GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags. These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not have the same meaning: 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted some logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is: ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> --- Not tested on HW. --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)