diff mbox series

[2/2] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add NanoPi R2S Plus

Message ID 20240731204126.8689-3-jin@mediatomb.cc (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Add DTS for NanoPi R2S Plus | expand

Commit Message

Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan July 31, 2024, 8:41 p.m. UTC
Add the NanoPi R2S Plus variant, which is an R2S with eMMC.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Bostandzhyan <jin@mediatomb.cc>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Aug. 1, 2024, 8:10 a.m. UTC | #1
On 31/07/2024 22:41, Sergey Bostandzhyan wrote:
> Add the NanoPi R2S Plus variant, which is an R2S with eMMC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Bostandzhyan <jin@mediatomb.cc>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 1 +

<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan Aug. 1, 2024, 6:05 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Krzysztof,

On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 10:10:09AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> <form letter>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
> 
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
> fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
> patches to the patchset.
> 
> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
> a waste of time.
> 
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
> </form letter>

thank you for all the hints, I did now use b4 to populate the addresses, so
I hope I did not miss anything. Sorry for the first fail, I am a "once in a few
years" submitter and I am having a hard time to get through the whole process :)

The patchset has been resent.

Kind regards,
Sergey
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
index 1ef09fbfdfaf..e3121d4eba18 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@  properties:
               - friendlyarm,nanopi-r2c
               - friendlyarm,nanopi-r2c-plus
               - friendlyarm,nanopi-r2s
+              - friendlyarm,nanopi-r2s-plus
           - const: rockchip,rk3328
 
       - description: FriendlyElec NanoPi4 series boards