Message ID | 74be71477b800f8a7b93a9e92ffeff9bf38c52ce.1518703554.git.robin.murphy@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Am Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2018, 15:05:53 CET schrieb Robin Murphy: > Trying to boot an RK3328 box with an HS200-capable eMMC, I see said eMMC > fail to initialise as it can't run its tuning procedure, because the > sample clock is missing. Upon closer inspection, whilst the clock is > present in the DT, its name is subtly incorrect per the binding, so > __of_clk_get_by_name() never finds it. By inspection, the drive clock > suffers from a similar problem, so has never worked properly either. > > Fix up all instances of the incorrect clock names across the 64-bit DTs. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> added apropriate Fixes-tags and applied as fix for 4.16 Thanks Heiko
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi index 822488bdf364..be2bfbc6b483 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi @@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clocks = <&cru HCLK_SDMMC>, <&cru SCLK_SDMMC>, <&cru SCLK_SDMMC_DRV>, <&cru SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE>; - clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu_drv", "ciu_sample"; + clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu-drive", "ciu-sample"; fifo-depth = <0x100>; status = "disabled"; }; @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clocks = <&cru HCLK_SDIO>, <&cru SCLK_SDIO>, <&cru SCLK_SDIO_DRV>, <&cru SCLK_SDIO_SAMPLE>; - clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu_drv", "ciu_sample"; + clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu-drive", "ciu-sample"; fifo-depth = <0x100>; status = "disabled"; }; @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clocks = <&cru HCLK_EMMC>, <&cru SCLK_EMMC>, <&cru SCLK_EMMC_DRV>, <&cru SCLK_EMMC_SAMPLE>; - clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu_drv", "ciu_sample"; + clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu-drive", "ciu-sample"; fifo-depth = <0x100>; status = "disabled"; }; diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368.dtsi index aa4d07046a7b..03458ac44201 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368.dtsi @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ max-frequency = <150000000>; clocks = <&cru HCLK_SDIO0>, <&cru SCLK_SDIO0>, <&cru SCLK_SDIO0_DRV>, <&cru SCLK_SDIO0_SAMPLE>; - clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu_drv", "ciu_sample"; + clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu-drive", "ciu-sample"; fifo-depth = <0x100>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; resets = <&cru SRST_SDIO0>;
Trying to boot an RK3328 box with an HS200-capable eMMC, I see said eMMC fail to initialise as it can't run its tuning procedure, because the sample clock is missing. Upon closer inspection, whilst the clock is present in the DT, its name is subtly incorrect per the binding, so __of_clk_get_by_name() never finds it. By inspection, the drive clock suffers from a similar problem, so has never worked properly either. Fix up all instances of the incorrect clock names across the 64-bit DTs. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi | 6 +++--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368.dtsi | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)