| Message ID | 1383905648-23733-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 8 November 2013 15:44, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote: > From: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org> > > The EPLL configuration register needs to be saved across > suspend/resume. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c > index ee866e377c80..6767635dc895 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static unsigned long exynos5250_clk_regs[] __initdata = { > SRC_CPU, > DIV_CPU0, > SRC_CORE1, > + EPLL_CON0, > SRC_TOP0, > SRC_TOP2, > SRC_TOP3, > -- > 1.7.9.5 > Forgot to mention that this series is based on top of Tomasz Figa's Exynos5250 cleanup series. http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg280039.html
Hi Sachin, Andrew, On Friday 08 of November 2013 15:44:06 Sachin Kamat wrote: > From: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org> > > The EPLL configuration register needs to be saved across > suspend/resume. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c > index ee866e377c80..6767635dc895 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static unsigned long exynos5250_clk_regs[] __initdata = { > SRC_CPU, > DIV_CPU0, > SRC_CORE1, > + EPLL_CON0, What about EPLL_CON1 and EPLL_CON2? Also, have you considered register restoration order? Anyway, I believe it's not the correct way to restore PLL configuration. See my Samsung PM consolidation series, especially patch [1] to see my proposed way of handling this. (Beware of a bug that snuck into this patch - samsung_clk_save() is not being called for PLL registers.) [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/24078/focus=24087 Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c index ee866e377c80..6767635dc895 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static unsigned long exynos5250_clk_regs[] __initdata = { SRC_CPU, DIV_CPU0, SRC_CORE1, + EPLL_CON0, SRC_TOP0, SRC_TOP2, SRC_TOP3,