| Message ID | 1483621969-27631-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected |
| Headers | show |
Hi, On 2017년 01월 05일 22:18, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 05/01/2017 14:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry >> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter. >> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for >> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board. >> >> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt >> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt >> N: exynos >> >> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES >> +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >> +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >> +S: Supported >> +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* >> + > > Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ? > I'm just helping to review the patches and test them on real h/w target as a supporter. I can dedicate some time for this. It would be easier for me for review if I'm cc'ed for patches.
Hello Chanwoo, On 01/05/2017 10:12 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry > in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter. > I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for > Exyno5433 and TM2/E board. > > Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E. > > Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt > N: exynos > > +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES > +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> > +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > +S: Supported > +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* > + > ARM/SAMSUNG MOBILE MACHINE SUPPORT > M: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> > L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > I think these fall under the "ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" entry, we don't have MAINTAINERS entry for individual Exynos SoCs. What you can do is to post a patch to add Andi and you as reviewers for the existing entry. The more people there, the better IMHO. Best regards,
Hi Daniel, > > +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES > > +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > > +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> > > +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > +S: Supported > > +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* > > + > > Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ? I think it does considering that exynos5433* files are more then the half of the arm64/.../exynos/ directory. Besides Chanwoo has authored all of them (almost) and doesn't appear from the get_maintainers script. Considering also that we are continuosly developing and maintaining exynos5433 and we can test, review and compare with the documents I think it makes more sense. Thanks, Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Javier, On 2017년 01월 05일 22:36, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Chanwoo, > > On 01/05/2017 10:12 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry >> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter. >> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for >> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board. >> >> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt >> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt >> N: exynos >> >> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES >> +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >> +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >> +S: Supported >> +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* >> + >> ARM/SAMSUNG MOBILE MACHINE SUPPORT >> M: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> >> L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >> > > I think these fall under the "ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" entry, > we don't have MAINTAINERS entry for individual Exynos SoCs. You're right. So, I just add the entry as a supporter. > > What you can do is to post a patch to add Andi and you as reviewers for the > existing entry. The more people there, the better IMHO. Thanks for your suggestion. I think that the reviewer of all Exynos should much times to review and test the patches. It is very important role. But, I have not much time to review all of Exynos patches. So, I just add the entry for Exynos5433.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:41:04PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > > > +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES > > > +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > > > +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> > > > +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > > +S: Supported > > > +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* > > > + > > > > Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ? > > I think it does considering that exynos5433* files are more then > the half of the arm64/.../exynos/ directory. > > Besides Chanwoo has authored all of them (almost) and doesn't > appear from the get_maintainers script. He appears: 1. Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) 2. Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:26/24=100%,authored:4/24=17%) 3. Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:6/24=25%) 4. Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> (commit_signer:12/24=50%,authored:8/24=33%) 5. Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%,authored:3/24=12%) 6. Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%) (sorry if lines are wrapped) Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry > in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter. > I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for > Exyno5433 and TM2/E board. > > Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E. > > Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt > N: exynos > > +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES > +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> > +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > +S: Supported > +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* > + Review and testing is always highly appreciated and you are doing, Chanwoo, great work. I would like to sincerely thank you for that. Samsung probably should thank you, as well. :) As for the additional sub-entry, I do not see any need for creating such entries for specific DTSes. This looks like overkill. At the same time I would like to strongly avoid something which is happening for example in our DRM where we have *four* maintainers but only *one* is responding. We can add bazilions of maintainers to satisfy Samsung KPIs but still this might not help reviewing patches (damn, why am I waiting with this small [0] thing since 21st of October?). On the other hand, this is just my personal opinion. If the broad open-source community would like to do any changes here (add/remove/move/whatever) I do not mind at all. Best regards and happy New Year! :D Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry >> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter. >> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for >> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board. >> >> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt >> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt >> N: exynos >> >> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES >> +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >> +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >> +S: Supported >> +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* >> + > > Review and testing is always highly appreciated and you are doing, > Chanwoo, great work. I would like to sincerely thank you for that. > Samsung probably should thank you, as well. :) > > As for the additional sub-entry, I do not see any need for creating > such entries for specific DTSes. This looks like overkill. > > At the same time I would like to strongly avoid something which is > happening for example in our DRM where we have *four* maintainers but > only *one* is responding. We can add bazilions of maintainers to satisfy > Samsung KPIs but still this might not help reviewing patches (damn, why > am I waiting with this small [0] thing since 21st of October?). > > On the other hand, this is just my personal opinion. If the broad > open-source community would like to do any changes here > (add/remove/move/whatever) I do not mind at all. Ah, forgot the link: [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9391635/ Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Krzysztof, On 2017년 01월 06일 02:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry >> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter. >> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for >> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board. >> >> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt >> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt >> N: exynos >> >> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES >> +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >> +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >> +S: Supported >> +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* >> + > > Review and testing is always highly appreciated and you are doing, > Chanwoo, great work. I would like to sincerely thank you for that. > Samsung probably should thank you, as well. :) > > As for the additional sub-entry, I do not see any need for creating > such entries for specific DTSes. This looks like overkill. > I'm in charge of verifying the all features of Exynos5433 and testing the Exynos5433-based TM/TM2E board in order to guarantee the stabilization and performance with Platform because TM2/TM2E is Tizen reference board. So, I just proposed this patch to prevent the missing patch. But, if you think it is not proper, I respect the opinion of maintainer. > At the same time I would like to strongly avoid something which is > happening for example in our DRM where we have *four* maintainers but > only *one* is responding. We can add bazilions of maintainers to satisfy > Samsung KPIs but still this might not help reviewing patches (damn, why > am I waiting with this small [0] thing since 21st of October?). > > On the other hand, this is just my personal opinion. If the broad > open-source community would like to do any changes here > (add/remove/move/whatever) I do not mind at all. > > Best regards and happy New Year! :D > Krzysztof > > >
On 2017년 01월 06일 01:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:41:04PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >>>> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES >>>> +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >>>> +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >>>> +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >>>> +S: Supported >>>> +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* >>>> + >>> >>> Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ? >> >> I think it does considering that exynos5433* files are more then >> the half of the arm64/.../exynos/ directory. >> >> Besides Chanwoo has authored all of them (almost) and doesn't >> appear from the get_maintainers script. > > He appears: > 1. Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) > > 2. Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:26/24=100%,authored:4/24=17%) > > 3. Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:6/24=25%) > > 4. Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> (commit_signer:12/24=50%,authored:8/24=33%) > > 5. Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%,authored:3/24=12%) > > 6. Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%) > > (sorry if lines are wrapped) I have a question. When I tested the get_maintainer script with Exynos5444 patch, I cannot get the same result from you. I tested the following patch[1] which was already merged by Marek. [1] commit-id: 74c78036d5b5970266fa2075a17c9b89cabf873e - ("arm64: dts: exynos: TM2 - add support for MFC video codec device" ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0001-arm64-dts-exynos-TM2-add-support-for-MFC-video-codec.patch Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) devicetree@vger.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Also, when I tested the exynos5433-tm2e.dts patch, I got the same result. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > >
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 12:21:44PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 2017년 01월 06일 01:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:41:04PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >>>> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES > >>>> +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > >>>> +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> > >>>> +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > >>>> +S: Supported > >>>> +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* > >>>> + > >>> > >>> Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ? > >> > >> I think it does considering that exynos5433* files are more then > >> the half of the arm64/.../exynos/ directory. > >> > >> Besides Chanwoo has authored all of them (almost) and doesn't > >> appear from the get_maintainers script. > > > > He appears: > > 1. Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) > > > > 2. Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:26/24=100%,authored:4/24=17%) > > > > 3. Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:6/24=25%) > > > > 4. Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> (commit_signer:12/24=50%,authored:8/24=33%) > > > > 5. Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%,authored:3/24=12%) > > > > 6. Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%) > > > > (sorry if lines are wrapped) > > I have a question. > > When I tested the get_maintainer script with Exynos5444 patch, > I cannot get the same result from you. The behavior of get_maintainers.pl changed few months ago and now it prints recent GIT activity only when there are no maintainers. To me personally, this is desired because otherwise a lot of people will be spammed on every patch. If someone wants to notify not only maintainers but also other people then he should use --git (which was used for output above). Best regards, Krzysztof > > I tested the following patch[1] which was already merged by Marek. > [1] commit-id: 74c78036d5b5970266fa2075a17c9b89cabf873e > - ("arm64: dts: exynos: TM2 - add support for MFC video codec device" > > ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0001-arm64-dts-exynos-TM2-add-support-for-MFC-video-codec.patch > Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) > Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) > Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) > Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) > Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) > devicetree@vger.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) > linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES) > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > > Also, when I tested the exynos5433-tm2e.dts patch, I got the same result. > > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Chanwoo Choi > Samsung Electronics > null -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt N: exynos +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES +M: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> +R: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers) +S: Supported +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433* + ARM/SAMSUNG MOBILE MACHINE SUPPORT M: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)